Hey am I the only one that thinks DoD Source is missing alot of weapons, maps, and 1 team compared to 1.3? Why are they to lazy to add in all the other dam maps, weapons and the team missing in dod:s? Though I doubt they will ever update it considering its older then 2007.
DoD:S is already awesome enough as it is
[QUOTE=sniperlover;19863314]DoD:S is already awesome enough as it is[/QUOTE]
Nah, Id rather have all the classic dod's weapons back.
[QUOTE=doonbugie;19863475]Nah, Id rather have all the classic dod's weapons back.[/QUOTE]
Go play classic then.
[QUOTE=Xyrec;19863502]Go play classic then.[/QUOTE]
I do, but a source version would be neat. Oops, Complete source version!
I like it how it is, I don't miss the other stuff, and if people loved a map from 1.3 so much, they're gonna map them themselfs
Some are in the game like the M1 carbine is used by the bazooka guy when it had it's own class in DoD 1.3
They on too concentrated in TF2 and [sp]Episode 3[/sp]
[QUOTE=The mouse;19866457]Some are in the game like the M1 carbine is used by the bazooka guy when it had it's own class in DoD 1.3[/QUOTE]
Gun is so OP.
i do wish the british army made a comeback in dod:s, seeing as how the enfield and the bren were awesome.
Why no Japanese it would rock
[QUOTE=RG4ORDR;19868121]Why no Japanese it would rock[/QUOTE]
because the japanese weren't in europe.
[QUOTE=GawdOfROFLS;19866667]They on too concentrated in TF2 and [sp]Episode 3[/sp][/QUOTE]
I doubt they are working on episode 3. they are to concentrated on l4d#
the reason why there are less weapons in DOD:S is because of balance, in DOD 1.3 some of the classes were unbalanced(rocket was fairly underpowred class) with DOD:S there was more importance on balance, so that every class somehow equal, or similar
[QUOTE=dagoth_ur;19872265]the reason why there are less weapons in DOD:S is because of balance, in DOD 1.3 some of the classes were unbalanced(rocket was fairly underpowred class) with DOD:S there was more importance on balance, so that every class somehow equal, or similar[/QUOTE]
Don't forget the British army only having 5 classes while their enemies had 8 or 9.
[QUOTE=Twilight_107;19872619]Don't forget the British army only having 5 classes while their enemies had 8 or 9.[/QUOTE]
yea but the guns were better.
The soviets could work in DoD, only they don't have any form of handheld rocket weaponry
[QUOTE=CertainDOOM;19874920]The soviets could work in DoD, only they don't have any form of handheld rocket weaponry[/QUOTE]
give them a rusty bazooka, add a note saying "This class randomly found a allied bazooka lying on the floor"
[QUOTE=dagoth_ur;19872265]the reason why there are less weapons in DOD:S is because of balance, in DOD 1.3 some of the classes were unbalanced(rocket was fairly underpowred class) with DOD:S there was more importance on balance, so that every class somehow equal, or similar[/QUOTE]
All classes are equal, but some are more equal than others.
They should add americans to the brits and russians to the germans.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;19875673]They should add americans to the brits and [b]russians to the germans.[/b][/QUOTE]
uh last time i checked the Russians was with the allies
[QUOTE=sniperlover;19863314]DoD:S is already awesome enough as it is[/QUOTE]
your stupid if you honestly believe that, I played the game since 1.3, Source is lacking HEAVILY.
[QUOTE=krakadict;19876841]uh last time i checked the Russians was with the allies[/QUOTE]
Well then give the Germans the Italians and give the Americans the Russians.
So just play DoD
Im just saying, They got rid of alot of good weapons and a team, DoDS Would be much funner with alot of the original content.
Honestly I think it would be better if a new DoD game was made rather than adding to the current Source one.
[QUOTE=GawdOfROFLS;19866667]They on too concentrated in TF2 and [sp]Episode 3[/sp][/QUOTE]
And Duke Nukem Forever.
i just wish valve would pay attention to dod:s for at least a month or so and add some new stuff in such as the enfield or bren.
I think Valve should make DoD: Vietnam.
:downs:
fuck it, it's hard to educate people on the internet and I'm too lazy to fact check.
[QUOTE=Makol;19893668]
that was your history lesson for the day :v:[/QUOTE]
Interesting lesson
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
