16, 24, 32 ? - Games - Facepunch Forum

Hello Bad Company! For thos of you who already tried the multiplayer, what do you think? What did you enjoy most? Smallscale, almost stealthy 8 vs 8 matches? Or maybe huge 16 vs 16 all out apocalypse? What do you enjoy? For me, in jungle maps like Valparaiso, 16 vs 16 is just not fun. It's not easy to spot enemies anyway, but with that many players, junglemaps are somehow not fun more me. Too many random "lol shot you in the back" moments. It's completely different for me in desert maps. Those are pretty empty and I love fighting vs a lot of people, seeing the map crumble in no time is damn awesome! I just think there should be more tickets whn there are more players, just like in the old BF games. The matches end far too soon when there are many players :( [editline]06:02PM[/editline] Fuck someone move that too Battlefield section please I was careless.

For a second I thought this was a Lost thread. but now I realize it's just a lost thread.

[QUOTE=Dclone2;20611853]For a second I thought this was a Lost thread. but now I realize it's just a lost thread.[/QUOTE] I thought it was the 8 times table.

[QUOTE=radioactive;20611869]I thought it was the 8 times table.[/QUOTE] In my head 16,24,32 was just too close to 16,23,42 to not think of Lost.

What? In BF:BC there's a max of 32 players? What the hell, how did DiCE fuck that one up.

You know, I actually wish there was a first person version of Team Tactical in MW2, the games are much slower paced and a lot more fun, they're just ruined by the awful third person.

[QUOTE=MrBob1337;20612062]What? In BF:BC there's a max of 32 players? What the hell, how did DiCE fuck that one up.[/QUOTE] No there's not a max. It's just that no one right now is willing to pay for the hosting on a 64-slot server.

Also it would be of no use. Pings are worse enough with 32 players. Like 250 to 350 for most people

Oh, ok.

We have a Battlefield section now you know.. [QUOTE=MrBob1337;20612062]What? In BF:BC there's a max of 32 players? What the hell, how did DiCE fuck that one up.[/QUOTE] They didn't fuck it. It's just right. Any more and it would have been too much going on and the map would last a minute before all the cover was blown. A lot of more stress on the servers and systems too.

16 vs 16 is not exactly massive now is it?

[QUOTE=Zombii;20612225]No there's not a max. It's just that no one right now is willing to pay for the hosting on a 64-slot server.[/QUOTE] Ummm. No theres max 32 players. Do your research. [editline]12:55PM[/editline] [QUOTE=MrBob1337;20612062]What? In BF:BC there's a max of 32 players? What the hell, how did DiCE fuck that one up.[/QUOTE] Any more than 32 players in that game and it will be unbalanced. the Environments would get destroyed instantly.

I like it 128 v 128.

I like 16 man servers, which is good as my clan has a 16 slot one. :v:

What happened to my 32 vs 32 Battlefield?

What? They cut it in half? Call me back if they ever fix it. :frown:

[QUOTE=fskman;20623688]What? They cut it in half? Call me back if they ever fix it. :frown:[/QUOTE] Sure what's your phone number?

[QUOTE=Killuah;20611805]Or maybe huge 16 vs 16 all out apocalypse?[/QUOTE] Dude, you'd shit your brains out if you saw the old 32 vs. 32 battles from the older days.

Still playing ol fine Battlefield 2 32v32 , this shit awesome , It is so fast paced that only the strongest survives ( I mean infantry only maps ) It might have quite nade spam , but still its awesome . But I think Bad Company should have huge battles too.

People still play BF2? Man I gotta try this shit out!