Who do you like more out of the two? Personally I prefer EA, while they've pumped out a lot of shit, they've kinda came around a bit more recently.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Dumb thread" - Jimbomcb))[/highlight]
I prefer fast threads.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Why reply" - Jimbomcb))[/highlight]
EA. They might've been bad 2-4 years ago with all of that ripping stuff from sims 2 and re-releasing it as expansions for 30 bucks and handling Spore, but now they improved a lot.
EA. Dedicated servers in games etc.
EA. They're not really shitty anymore, Activision broke into their HQ and stole all the raw evil to inject into their CEO, so they have none left at EA.
EA have never been shit, it's just people bandwagoning. I mean like all the games I own have something to do with EA.
They used to seem harsh with their DRM and rushing out games and low quality film tie-ins.
Then all the other big games companies overtook them in bad stuff so in comparison they're pretty good.
I think you shouldn't compare EA with Activision. It's worth comparing with Valve, THQ, Bioware..
Don't take me as shit but i like them both.
Sure they take over studios and shit all over their products but they still make games i enjoy playing.
Activision. I'm still disgusted on how EA sells the same sports game every year for $60... and people STILL BUY IT.
Ea. I'm still disgusted on how Activision sells the same FPS game every year for $60... and people STILL BUY IT.
[QUOTE=W00tbeer1;24182957]I'm still disgusted on how Activision sells the same Call Of Duty game every year for $60... and people STILL BUY IT.[/QUOTE]
fixed
[editline]02:04AM[/editline]
i got ninja'd :saddowns:
:smug:
EA really isn't that bad.
EA, because they don't prisonrape gaming in general.
[QUOTE=W00tbeer1;24182957]Activision. I'm still disgusted on how EA sells the same sports game every year for $60... and people STILL BUY IT.[/QUOTE]
Would you call me evil if I squeezed shit into plastic bags and stood at a street corner selling the bags for $50 each? And people would buy it?
It's the consumer that's stupid, blame them. EA needs the sports games and Sims to make money for the more innovative projects.
Who actually votes for Activision?
Name one thing that they have done for gaming, that is positive.
EA is like jesus compared to the hellspawn that is Activision
hmm
gonna have to say I like EA more, they really dropped the ball with spore but their ceo, if i recall, actually plays games and knows at least what people want
[QUOTE=W00tbeer1;24182957]Activision. I'm still disgusted on how EA sells the same sports game every year for $60... and people STILL BUY IT.[/QUOTE]
I can agree on the NHL 2000-2009 serie but NHL 10 is a huge step from NHL 09, Alot of improvements, to bad they wont release it to PC.
As long as Activision has bobby kotick, they have no place in the gaming world.
EA, Bobby Kotick is pretty much evil incarnate right now.
EA is also so greedy that they had to buy out the rights to the NFL just so they don't have 2K Sports giving them competition. That's how bad they are at making games.
Buying rights =/= Bad games
It's like choosing between two kinds of shit. :buddy:
I think I go with EA.
EA = Battlefield series.
[QUOTE=Grabigel;24184032]EA = Battlefield series.[/QUOTE]
They just publish it.
DICE makes it, wich IMO should be together with Rockstar Games and alot of other good game producers.
At Take 2.
[QUOTE=FPChris;24183992]Buying rights =/= Bad games[/QUOTE]
It creates no competition so they have no reason to make their game better.
EA has greatly improved, and still even at it's lowest EA wasn't as bad as Activision is now.
EA is ok, Activision is truly evil, I mean $15 for 5 maps, 2 of which were in a previous game? It's ridiculous.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
