This thread is for people that are anticipating the release of MOH and for those people to post updates/rarely known info about it.
Absolutely NO MW2 AT ALL
Excellent OP. Full of informations, would come back gladly.
oh sorry thought this was a thread for MW2
Is this a hate thread? Medal of Honor is going to suck, basically spitting on its glorious ancestor the [B]original[/B] Medal of Honor.
Update: They changed the name at the last minute to Battlefield: Modern war Company 2
Campaign will be cool, multiplayer is going to SUCK.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;24822239]Campaign will be cool, multiplayer is going to SUCK.[/QUOTE]
Like every multiplayer shooter with unrealistic weapons and no balance what-so-ever. Frostbite makes it even fucking worse, honestly whoever decided to let Dice make the multiplayer is a fucking moron. I can't wait for the story though.
[QUOTE=Legend286;24822267]Like every multiplayer shooter with unrealistic weapons and no balance what-so-ever. Frostbite makes it even fucking worse, honestly whoever decided to let Dice make the multiplayer is a fucking moron. I can't wait for the story though.[/QUOTE]
Who ever let dice do the online, I'd let them do it, they made battlefield series pretty good online.
[QUOTE=Legend286;24822267]Like every multiplayer shooter with unrealistic weapons and no balance what-so-ever. Frostbite makes it even fucking worse, honestly whoever decided to let Dice make the multiplayer is a fucking moron. I can't wait for the story though.[/QUOTE]
Bad Company & 2, Battlefield 1943, etc... bad?
My thoughts on [url=http://www.megagames.com/news/no-more-medal-honor-if-it-doesn%E2%80%99t-sell-3-million-units]this[/url]:
They are blatantly ripping off Modern Warfare on the singleplayer front
while on the multiplayer they got Dice to do their dirty work for them, which is a clunky, uninspiring Modern Warfare copy with some elements (mostly the bad ones) from BC2 thrown into the blender.
and they expect good sales?
The game is clearly targeted for the average Call of Duty player, but guess what, EA? They will go and buy Black Ops instead. While hardcore gamers knows better than to buy this piece of shit.
Perhaps you would get better sales by developing a game set in a less overused war than the Afghanistan-war (I wouldn't mind going back to WW2 again, been a while since last time) and getting some new ideas instead of pathetically ripping off the Modern Warfare franchise.
One, I said no mw2.
Two, the fuckin thing isn't out yet, so you can't say what it IS
Three, treyarch is making blackops. Their previous games sucked, but blackops may not. If games from treyarch can "evolve" and get better, why can't games made by dice?
Third, this is not a hate thread, so if you don't think you'll like it, good for you. Don't post here.
If you DO like what it looks like, post trailers, updates, andcwhat you think is cool about it.
[QUOTE=niclawton;24822451]Bad Company & 2, Battlefield 1943, etc... bad?[/QUOTE]
Battlefield 1942, BF2, and BF2142 blow any xbawkz egclusive battlefield game out of the water. including bc2.
[QUOTE=krazipanda;24822851]One, I said no mw2.
Two, the fuckin thing isn't out yet, so you can't say what it IS
Three, treyarch is making blackops. Their previous games sucked, but blackops may not. If games from treyarch can "evolve" and get better, why can't games made by dice?
Third, this is not a hate thread, so if you don't think you'll like it, good for you. Don't post here.
If you DO like what it looks like, post trailers, updates, andcwhat you think is cool about it.[/QUOTE]
One, I mentioned MW1, so beat it.
Two, I've seen the singleplayer in action and I was in the multiplayer beta. Very underwhelming.
Three, as said above; I was in the beta and it blew. And while Treyarch is adding new features Dice/Danger Close is just ripping off MW1.
Third(?), you're right.
[quote=Wikipedia]An Internet forum, or message board, is an online [b]discussion[/b] site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted messages.[/quote]
It's a discussion thread. My post was masterfully crafted and well thought, not a typical "Looks shit" post.
What would be the point of a thread where you're only allowed to post if you like what you see?
[QUOTE=krazipanda;24822851]
Three, treyarch is making blackops. Their previous games sucked, but blackops may not. If games from treyarch can "evolve" and get better, why can't games made by dice?
.[/QUOTE]
The expansions treyarc made for call of duty 1 or(and?)2 were great, call of duty 3 was terrible, WaW was a reskin of Mw1, what makes you think that black ops will be the most amazing thing since sliced bread? if anything they're devolving. same for dice, cause everything past 2142 pales in comparison to the original bf games. Medal of honor is trying to take the best of both worlds, but they're doing a shitty job of it.
I dont like the Multiplayer, SIngleplayer looks ok.
[QUOTE=kevlar jens;24822979]One, I mentioned MW1, so beat it.
Two, I've seen the singleplayer in action and I was in the multiplayer beta. Very underwhelming.
Three, as said above; I was in the beta and it blew. And while Treyarch is adding new features Dice/Danger Close is just ripping off MW1.
Third(?), you're right.
It's a discussion thread. My post was masterfully crafted and well thought, not a typical "Looks shit" post.
What would be the point of a thread where you're only allowed to post if you like what you see?[/QUOTE]
Cause that's what this thread is about. Hundreds of pol don't like what they see, and rid not interesting to see 5 pages of
"looks like shit!"
[editline]10:02AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;24823028]The expansions treyarc made for call of duty 1 or(and?)2 were great, call of duty 3 was terrible, WaW was a reskin of Mw1, what makes you think that black ops will be the most amazing thing since sliced bread? if anything they're devolving. same for dice, cause everything past 2142 pales in comparison to the original bf games. Medal of honor is trying to take the best of both worlds, but they're doing a shitty job of it.[/QUOTE]
Lol, I think blackops is gonna be shit, just giving other ppl a reference.
[editline]10:05AM[/editline]
And for the people that think multi is lookin shit, betas are USUALLY shit with op weapons. They track data like who got what kills from what range with how much accuracy with what clip left in how many shots how fast.
Everything will be balanced, I guarantee.
[QUOTE=krazipanda;24823168]
Everything will be balanced, [b]I guarantee.[/b][/QUOTE]
I gonna sue you.
[QUOTE=Melon_Mapper;24822437]Who ever let dice do the online, I'd let them do it, they made battlefield series pretty good online.[/QUOTE]
Except MoH MP is terrible because of Dice. There was no external input from the MoH devs.
Well im just glad there is going to be another medal of honor game, I have always found the whole point of MOH games were the singleplayer, it's always deep and exciting, and theres almost always a twist about half through.
[QUOTE=niclawton;24822451]Bad Company & 2, Battlefield 1943, etc... bad?[/QUOTE]
yes, bf2,bf1942,vietnam were not bad, the rest was
[editline]06:26PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=benzinxrm;24823885]I have always found the whole point of MOH games were the singleplayer, it's always deep and exciting, and theres almost always a twist about half through.[/QUOTE]
the original devs are not making this MoH, so you shouldn't expect it to be like the old ones
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
