• In bizarre effort to combat revenge porn, Facebook asks users to send them nudes
    53 replies, posted
[quote]Facebook's latest attempt to wipe revenge porn off its platform takes an unusual tack: [B]asking users to send in their own nude photos. [/B] The Australian government's Office of the eSafety Commissioner announced it is joining a pilot program with Facebook to prevent intimate images of users from appearing against their will on the world's largest social network. According to the eSafety Office, if a Facebook user in Australia is concerned about an intimate image spreading online, they fill out a form, then send the image to themselves using Messenger. Once Facebook is notified, they use image-matching technology to access and tag the image to prevent anyone from sharing it on their platforms. The measure is designed to block users from sharing a photo before it can do harm. "This partnership gives Australians a unique opportunity to proactively inoculate themselves from future image-based abuse by coming to our portal and reporting tool," said Julie Inman Grant, Australia's eSafety Commissioner, in a statement. The limited pilot program is available in three other countries: the U.S., U.K., and Canada. [/quote] Source: [URL="https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/11/08/facebook-tests-fighting-revenge-porn-asking-users-file-nude-photos-first/843364001/"]https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/11/08/facebook-tests-fighting-revenge-porn-asking-users-file-nude-photos-first/843364001/[/URL]
uh, no.
Whomever thought up that policy is missing a few brain cells.
Call the initiative dick pics against revenge flicks
Just imagine if this database got hacked. I think we all know most companies are pathetic when it comes to cybersecurity.
Haven't heard of big leaks from Facebook though? It might work, even as dumb as it sounds. It'd be a bit better when you could simply send them a hash or a censored proof of your nude to ban similar pics?
You know some group is probably looking into hacking Facebook now.
[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;52872955]I wouldn't call Facebook pathetic with security.. Also it's probably just a hash.[/QUOTE] Unless there are some hash algorithms specifically for lossy images hashes wouldn't work. If you change even one pixel by one bit the hash must change.
the policy is a little odd but it makes sense if you think about it
[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;52872955]I wouldn't call Facebook pathetic with security.. Also it's probably just a hash.[/QUOTE] I heard a week or so ago that Facebook is hiring several [I]thousand[/I] people to their security department over the next few months, so I think they should be okay. Majority of the hires are in response to the Russian fake news meddling that happened in 2016 but I'm sure at least a few hundred of those new hires will be for other cybersecurity things, like hacking prevention.
Remember kids, mirror image horizontally, invert/desaturate, compress and crop your revenge nudes before uploading.
what if you send something other than your nudes though?
[QUOTE=Spleet;52873017]Remember kids, mirror image horizontally, invert/desaturate, compress and crop your revenge nudes before uploading.[/QUOTE] Or DeepDream them
The Australian Government needs to get in contact with Nathan Fielder for his idea on how to tackle the worry people will have with government employees handling their nudes. [media]https://youtu.be/jf9I04Oa-hU[/media]
[QUOTE=SenhorCreeper;52873019]what if you send something other than your nudes though?[/QUOTE] Send them a photo of trump's face and prevent him from ever showing up on FB news again.
[QUOTE=Spleet;52873017]Remember kids, mirror image horizontally, invert/desaturate, compress and crop your revenge nudes before uploading.[/QUOTE] That won't work on Facebook's algorithm, regardless of lighting or angle it still detects it [url]https://research.fb.com/publications/deepface-closing-the-gap-to-human-level-performance-in-face-verification/[/url]
[QUOTE=Berkin;52873021]Or DeepDream them[/QUOTE] I like the idea, but I can't jack it to that.
Ok guys, this is about pictures that have already been shared on facebook. So when that happens, the person who got the image leaked obviously have the original, which he/she sends to herself with the tag, triggering the system. Its not like the image wasn't available for facebook to see/find/archive already, and i do think they probably have some system behind it that doesn't allow anyone surveying the system pull out names with matching images. I think this is a smart system, BUT it is only on images directly on facebook, and only works on identical/close to identical images.
I have a feeling there will be a 4chan campaign to trick people to send them nudes using exactly this reasoning.
Hey Facebook, stop stealing my moves!
the dick algorithm of the facebook ai can only grow stronger for every dick pic
Sick strategy to get nudes Mark ya dirty bastard
Just make a reddit account called PM_ME_DICK_PICS or something, jeez.
I could see this working for people that have tattoos, otherwise you would have to go out of your way to take nudes in such a way that an algorithm could tell is you based on the photos you've provided. "Send me a pic of your butthole" "Sorry Facebook only knows what my front side looks like"
What if someone would have identical dick, a dick soulmate.
if facebook would show how its processed and prove that it'll never reach human eyes then I'd honestly trust it.
[QUOTE=WrathOfCat;52873137]if facebook would show how its processed and prove that it'll never reach human eyes then I'd honestly trust it.[/QUOTE] That whole process needs to be client-side and done in a way that makes that obvious to the user (i.e. an app without internet permission that creates a pre-written email with the hash and opens it in the mail-app). Have someone review the photo on first match to figure out if it's actually what the original submission said, and if not let that pending submission go online/public. You can do this with low friction by showing a notification below the picture if there's a match and not making it visible to anyone except the original poster until reviewed.
[QUOTE=SenhorCreeper;52873033]That won't work on Facebook's algorithm, regardless of lighting or angle it still detects it [url]https://research.fb.com/publications/deepface-closing-the-gap-to-human-level-performance-in-face-verification/[/url][/QUOTE] What about GMask?
are they implying they don't have them already :v:
This is like a car insurance company saying "to stop others from wrecking your car, we'll wreck it for you!" And just taking a fucking wrecking ball to it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.