Why the fuck should they cater to other services, They arn't owned by the goverment and being paid. They are offering there own services and are still being nice enough to have other services listed as well.
[QUOTE=CubeManv2;36039734]Why the fuck should they cater to other services, They arn't owned by the goverment and being paid. They are offering there own services and are still being nice enough to have other services listed as well.[/QUOTE]
And they're doing a lot of those services for [I]free[/I].
Understandably there are other websites that offer the same services for free also, but Google is the least annoying when it comes to advertising.
You guys are forgetting about this possible situation.
- A company advertises its site for the keyword "documents".
- A search for documents puts the advertised website in the advertised section of the results page (which they have to pay for per display/click)
- Google Documents appear as first non-sponsored result.
The question arises: Is Google Documents the first result because is it most relevant on the entire internet or because google provided the answers?
Of course, "documents" may be a bad example since Google dominates the first result on every search engine, but consider if Google Plus was the first result for "online social networking" while facebook and myspace and the other scrubs had to pay for the less glamorous advertised spaces?
And that's only the first point of the [B]four mentioned in the article[/B].
It's their site, they can do whatever they want with it. The government doesn't have any right whatsoever to force someone to change their website. Only China does. Or so I thought.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
