[QUOTE=fpmankills;19697489][url]http://cyri.systemrequirementslab.com/srtest/[/url][/QUOTE]
this is so inaccurate
[QUOTE=ColossalSoft;19697475]Specs:
32-Bit Windows Vista Home Premium (Service pack 2)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ 2.50 GHz
3.00 GB RAM
nVidia Geforce GT 220[/QUOTE]
Don't even bother buying it.
Nope.
YES IT CAN
why does this place go OH NOT ON MAX CAN'T RUN IT
it will run it not very well but it can
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19697549]YES IT CAN
why does this place go OH NOT ON MAX CAN'T RUN IT
it will run it not very well but it can[/QUOTE]
This ^
[QUOTE=fpmankills;19697489][url]http://cyri.systemrequirementslab.com/srtest/[/url][/QUOTE]
no
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19697549]YES IT CAN
why does this place go OH NOT ON MAX CAN'T RUN IT
it will run it not very well but it can[/QUOTE]
Ok, sure, it can run it, but it's going to run like utter shit.
[editline]12:37AM[/editline]
Case in point:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-E7Fm66S5o[/media]
And that's with a (much) better graphics card than the OP has.
[editline]12:38AM[/editline]
[IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/GT220-GTA4-1280.png[/IMG]
Once again, and this is with an i7 920 @ 3.5GHz with 6GB DDR3 1400.
[QUOTE=fpmankills;19697489][url]http://cyri.systemrequirementslab.com/srtest/[/url][/QUOTE]
no
I got a 9600GT and a Q8200 and I can barely run the game at 25fps maxed out, so I'd say no, if you're wanting the best graphical settings
[QUOTE=Odellus;19697586]Ok, sure, it can run it, but it's going to run like utter shit.
[editline]12:37AM[/editline]
Case in point:
[URL="http://www.facepunch.com/#"]View YouTUBE video[/URL]
[URL]http://youtube.com/watch?v=I-E7Fm66S5o[/URL]
And that's with a (much) better graphics card than the OP has.[/QUOTE]
HE IS RUNNING IT 1650x1080 (all high) OF COURSE IT IS GOING TO RUN LIKE SHIT
if you run it 1366x768 or 1440x900 and high/med no AA it should be much smoother, very playable
hell I can run MW2 fine on 1156x864 medium and get 35~45fps on a 3450, it is called learning to adjust settings
also
>launch drivers
>AA
>AF 16
>1280x1024
1/10
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19697718]HE IS RUNNING IT 1650x1080 (all high) OF COURSE IT IS GOING TO RUN LIKE SHIT
if you run it 1366x768 or 1440x900 and high/med no AA it should be much smoother, very playable
hell I can run MW2 fine on 1156x864 medium and get 35~45fps on a 3450, it is called learning to adjust settings[/QUOTE]
If you've ever played GTA IV, which I doubt you have by your post (you can't compare MW2 to GTA IV, in fact, I chuckled a bit when I read that), settings other than view distance and detail distance have little to no impact on performance, including resolution.
[editline]12:44AM[/editline]
lol you live in virginia
[QUOTE=Odellus;19697764]If you've ever played GTA IV, which I doubt you have by your post (you can't compare MW2 to GTA IV, in fact, I chuckled a bit when I read that), settings other than view distance and detail distance have little to no impact on performance, including resolution.[/QUOTE]
runs fine on my labtop
G50VT 512mb ram
4gb DDR2
P8600
>I chuckled a bit when I read that), settings other than view distance and detail distance have little to no impact on performance, including resolution.
you best be trolling, those are the things that determine frames. Cards don't run because of the label. the video clearly shows the game plays at 17fps on high 1650x1080, lowering the res and detail, will reduce the load on the GPU thus adding more frames
That game can not "run properly" on any computer that exists now or will exist in the next 3 years.
lol facebook
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19697833]runs fine on my labtop
G50VT 512mb ram
4gb DDR2
P8600
>I chuckled a bit when I read that), settings other than view distance and detail distance have little to no impact on performance, including resolution.
you best be trolling, those are the things that determine frames. Cards don't run because of the label. the video clearly shows the game plays at 17fps on high 1650x1080, lowering the res and detail, will reduce the load on the GPU thus adding more frames[/QUOTE]
Go play GTA IV and then tell me lowering the resolution and some of the detail settings gives significant increase in framerates.
[editline]12:52AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19697868]lol facebook[/QUOTE]
hi im in wv you are my boot
[editline]12:57AM[/editline]
Now that I think about it, the 4800+ is going to dramatically decrease framerates, even after lowering his settings completely. OP just don't even bother.
[QUOTE=Odellus;19697908]Go play GTA IV and then tell me lowering the resolution and some of the detail settings gives significant increase in framerates.
[editline]12:52AM[/editline]
hi im in wv you are my boot[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/16400-nvidia-geforce-gtx-275-896mb-review-16.html[/url]
AMAZING ON ALL CARD WHEN THE RESOLUTION GOES UP THE FRAMES DECREASE.
I mean it isn't like pixels take up Vram or anything and lowering the amount of pixels the GPU has to produce could some how speed things up when the GPu's core has to process less I mean that would be math mathematically correct, and as we all know computers don't do math
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19698033][url]http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/16400-nvidia-geforce-gtx-275-896mb-review-16.html[/url]
AMAZING ON ALL CARD WHEN THE RESOLUTION GOES UP THE FRAMES DECREASE.
I mean it isn't like pixels take up Vram or anything and lowering the amount of pixels the GPU has to produce could some how speed things up when the GPu's core has to process less I mean that would be math mathematically correct, and as we all know computers don't do math[/QUOTE]
Gee, a minimal difference of 11 FPS between [b]1680x1050 and 2560x1600[/b].
[editline]01:13AM[/editline]
Do I have to go run some benchmarks for you?
[QUOTE=Odellus;19698277]Gee, a minimal difference of 11 FPS between [B]1680x1050 and 2560x1600[/B].
[editline]01:13AM[/editline]
Do I have to go run some benchmarks for you?[/QUOTE]
the low end card jumps ~13fps fyi
the higher end ones don'
t take much of a hit
18+~13 = ~31
damn playable to me
The 220 is a re-branded 9500GT, with slightly faster clocks. I have a 9500GT and I can run it on max textures, and max shadows just fine. It all depends on the CPU. My Athlon 4400+ runs at 23 fps while spamming cars, 78 fps while flying.
[url]http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3657&p=6[/url]
or read these reviews of where when they turn down the res all card get better fps
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19698382]the low end card jumps ~13fps fyi
the higher end ones don'
t take much of a hit
18+~13 = ~41
damn playable to me[/QUOTE]
Nice Math...
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19698382]the low end card jumps ~13fps fyi
the higher end ones don'
t take much of a hit
18+~13 = ~41
damn playable to me[/QUOTE]
Drop the GT 220 in there. Oh look, 19 FPS. Lower the resolution, oh look 23 FPS, drop the 4800+ in there, oh look, 15 FPS.
[editline]01:27AM[/editline]
are you trolling me
You should be able to play.
I just did a benchmark for comparison
[IMG]http://i46.tinypic.com/b3nekw.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/slr4e8.png[/IMG]
GTX 260 C216
E8400 @ 3.6GHz
2x 2GB G. Skill RAM 4-4-4-12
[QUOTE=Odellus;19698575]Drop the GT 220 in there. Oh look, 19 FPS. Lower the resolution, oh look 23 FPS, drop the 4800+ in there, oh look, 15 FPS.
[editline]01:27AM[/editline]
are you trolling me[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkODlHEhjhk[/media]
PENTIUM 4 + GT220
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCSFoQvDEHQ[/media]
PEntium D 1.6 and 3450
looks fine to me
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;19698702][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkODlHEhjhk[/media]
PENTIUM 4 + GT220
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCSFoQvDEHQ[/media]
PEntium D 1.6 and 3450
looks fine to me[/QUOTE]
Yeah man that almost touches Crysis, shit damn brb buying PD and a 3450!
point is a GT220 is MUCH better than a 3450 and a 4800+ is ass loads better than a pentium D at 1.6
OP can run it.
I mean if Macbooks are able to run it (all settings low at 800x600) with a 9400m and 2.0ghz core 2 duo then I think the OP will be fine.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
