buzzwords like photorealistic kind of bother me when it comes to games, i know you wanna really sell it but don't go -too- overboard, marketing!
that being said, it's definitely a looker!
[editline]2nd July 2014[/editline]
It'll be interesting to see how their facial capture system rivals say L.A. Noire's in the long run though!
even if it's shit, im still gonna paly it
hahaha wow guys calm down
[QUOTE=Ganix565;45271320]even if it's shit, im still gonna paly it[/QUOTE]
everyone else does
[QUOTE=Ganix565;45271320]even if it's shit, im still gonna paly it[/QUOTE]
It's people like you who keep shitty franchises alive...
[QUOTE=Ganix565;45271320]even if it's shit, im still gonna paly it[/QUOTE]
Call of duty games typically have free weekends, so if you have a few days to burn and 80gb of HD space then you can get it then.
Also I wonder if they have fancy stuff like PBR and SSS (Physically based rendering and Sub-Surface Scattering)
[QUOTE=Stiffy360;45271937]Call of duty games typically have free weekends, so if you have a few days to burn and 80gb of HD space then you can get it then.[/QUOTE]
But it's always limited to the multiplayer
[QUOTE=DMGaina;45271950]But it's always limited to the multiplayer[/QUOTE]
Not like singleplayer is worth much in call of duty. MP is enough to get a feel for the game.
[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;45271699]It's people like you who keep shitty franchises alive...[/QUOTE]
They are part of the problem, the kinda creature that undermines the efforts of the pious self-sacrificial among us.
Also I look at CoD's "photorealism" and all I see is wasted millions, millions that could have been invested in better gameplay and level design. That said the gadgetry available in Advanced Warfare does make it seem a bit more fun and interesting, though it'll probably be stuck to scripted sequences and coupled with not having a health bar unlike REAL shooters.
[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;45271699]It's people like you who keep shitty franchises alive...[/QUOTE]
Not if he pirates it.
"Photorealistic"
"Cinematic Experience"
"Dropped"
[QUOTE=Midas22;45272112]"Photorealistic"
"Cinematic Experience"
"Dropped"[/QUOTE]
So the Last of Us was bad? It used all of these buzzwords and even more. Still a pretty massive success despite being PS3-4 locked.
Its not gonna look good, so many other games always look better than CoD, even older ones. CoD marketing is the worst, dont know why anyone would take there word for anything at this point.
This shit seems really to have reached a point where it's more of an interactive movie than a game. Whatever happened to gameplay?
I recently have been playing an Android port of a certain 1992 RTS game and i'd rather play that than a CoD game.
The last thing I want from a CoD game is photorealism. Or realism at all for that matter...
Whose face shines like that for fucks sake.
as cinematic as possible*
I'm not blown away by those "photorealistic" faces in the slightest.
The problem is that devs simply cannot make the skin or face of an NPC react realistically to lighting. FIFA keeps boasting about how lifelike their players are but they all look kinda flat shaded or if there is a light it makes them look plasticy by making the light reflect slightly.
Maybe that's just me, I dunno.
[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;45272418]"Cinematic Experience" is just a buzzword for 24fps.[/QUOTE]
Hasn't COD always been 60 fps on consoles?
[QUOTE=Swiket;45272721]Hasn't COD always been 60 fps on consoles?[/QUOTE]
Yes it has.
CoD has always been 60fps. I dont know why its getting disagrees.
[QUOTE=mark6789;45273080]CoD has always been 60fps. I dont know why its getting disagrees.[/QUOTE]
Because it hasn't always been a consistent 60FPS? Like if you play a game with an unlocked framerate that peaks at 159 FPS, you don't say the game has 159FPS.
I hope they keep the multiplayer formula good
It's what makes call of duty great IMO
[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;45271699]It's people like you who keep shitty franchises alive...[/QUOTE]
You make it seem like he's funding the mexican drug war. It's just a shitty game, who fucking cares if people play it and who fucking cares if publishers keep churning it out?
[QUOTE=RichyZ;45273984]have you ever actually played it on console?
theres hardly any point where it doesnt stay 60[/QUOTE]
Nah, there's lots of framerate drops, at least on PS3. I've seen 'em more frequently in the later games like Black Ops 2.
Also, the PS4 version of Ghosts has HUGE framerate issues.
[QUOTE=MrHeadHopper;45272148]So the Last of Us was bad? It used all of these buzzwords and even more. Still a pretty massive success despite being PS3-4 locked.[/QUOTE]
Yeah but Naughty Dog is competent.
[QUOTE=Qwerty Bastard;45274404]You make it seem like he's funding the mexican drug war. It's just a shitty game, who fucking cares if people play it and who fucking cares if publishers keep churning it out?[/QUOTE]
A lot of people?
[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;45274468]A lot of people?[/QUOTE]
Well those people need to grow up and get over themselves.
I smell some bullshit :D
That photo reminds me of that MBD.
[IMG]http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/007/660/1z66vjt.jpg.gif[/IMG]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
