Today I'm going to give you a quick overview of how you can hack into WEP, WPA/WPA2 wireless networks. This comes from a series of PowerPoint slides that my university class did in a lecture on our final day.
I do not condone this in any kind of illegal manner. However, what you do with your time is up to you.
Shall we get get started?
We are going to be using a program called BackTrack 4.
[IMG]http://imgur.com/xeWJu.png[/IMG]
This slide just gives a little bit of information on Linux, since BackTrack 4 is a distribution of it (see bottom of slide).
[IMG]http://imgur.com/FjEtZ.png[/IMG]
An overview of the different kind of keys that protect current wireless networks.
[IMG]http://imgur.com/aRXbu.png[/IMG]
Self-explanatory (as with most of the other slides and as you will find, the whole presentation).
[IMG]http://imgur.com/ez5aq.png[/IMG]
Some Linux mumbo-jumbo.
[IMG]http://imgur.com/Qmq4x.png[/IMG]
An overview of the GUI.
[IMG]http://imgur.com/QevBQ.jpg[/IMG]
Yes. it pretty much is that simple!
I have included the link for you to download:
[URL]http://www.backtrack-linux.org/[/URL]
You may find additional help and documentation here if you have any troubles.
[quote]Baha, sorry guys [for the lame presentation].
It's all the information I received from the [B]class[/B], honestly don't know why I'm getting so many dumbs for it. I just thought it was neat and wanted to share.
Those with intelligence and some motivation can read extra documentation or watch a YouTube video.[/quote]
First slide is wrong, Linux isn't an operating system, it's a kernel.
Also it's eavesdropping, not evesdropping
[QUOTE=nikomo;29351046]First slide is wrong, Linux isn't an operating system, it's a kernel.
Also it's eavesdropping, not evesdropping[/QUOTE]
Sorry. I didn't proof-read it before I posted the slides.
To be fair, I didn't make them myself. I am much more thorough with my work.
Though I dislike how you posted this as it encourages poor behaviour by unethical people, it is informative.
The first slide is really not needed; I wonder if there's a single person in H&S who doesn't know what Linux is.
Either way, quite informative OP.
[QUOTE=VistaPOWA;29351257]The first slide is really not needed; I wonder if there's a single person in H&S who doesn't know what Linux is.
Either way, quite informative OP.[/QUOTE]
He did it for university, not for H&S.
omg linux is a hacker os!!?!?!
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;29350637]We are going to be using a [b]program called BackTrack 4[/b].[/QUOTE]
BackTrack is a program?
Fuck me I meant to add this to my post above.
Sorry.
[QUOTE=VistaPOWA;29351257]The first slide is really not needed; I wonder if there's a single person in H&S who doesn't know what Linux is.
Either way, quite informative OP.[/QUOTE]
and if they don't know what linux is they probably shouldn't try hacking wifi
For Bell users, if you forget your wifi password, it's easier to just hack yourself than deal with their customer support
Hah, I'm behind WPA2-Enterprise without SSID broadcasting, on a /30 subnet network that requires Windows authentication.
It'll take you a massive 7 minutes extra more to get through. :science:
Real men use Aircrack-ng.
My neighbor had wep security. His internet is faster than mine so I sometimes connect my notebook to it and download some stuff.
Perfect for netbooks
[QUOTE=johan_sm;29353327]My neighbor had wep security. His internet is faster than mine so I sometimes connect my notebook to it and download some stuff.[/QUOTE]
You're an asshole.
Unless you live in a place where data caps are a thing of the past.
My neighbor used to connect on my wireless network to download his shit. At the time, there was a 7$ fee for every gigabyte you download over your limit until you reached 30 GB.
210$ in additional fees + the 40$ the shitty connection cost :colbert:
[QUOTE=Tools;29352116]Hah, I'm behind WPA2-Enterprise without SSID broadcasting, on a /31 subnet network that requires Windows authentication.
It'll take you a massive 7 minutes extra more to get through. :science:[/QUOTE]
How can you be on a /31 subnet? That means all bits in the first 3 octets are for the network, and the last octet is NNNNNNNH, and since you can only have 1 or 0 as a bit, both of those should be reserved for the network id and the broadcast, yeah?
I could have sworn that you needed a specific type of wireless card that allows for like packet injection of something...
[QUOTE=Master117;29356005]I could have sworn that you needed a specific type of wireless card that allows for like packet injection of something...[/QUOTE]
The slideshow specifies a specific NIC that supports it, and it says that he's unsure of any others that do.
[QUOTE=chewgo;29355945]How can you be on a /31 subnet? That means all bits in the first 3 octets are for the network, and the last octet is NNNNNNNH, and since you can only have 1 or 0 as a bit, both of those should be reserved for the network id and the broadcast, yeah?[/QUOTE]
Broadcasting data erryday. Who needs unique IP addresses.
Atheros chipsets are generally better than Realtek for this.
[QUOTE=chewgo;29355945]How can you be on a /31 subnet? That means all bits in the first 3 octets are for the network, and the last octet is NNNNNNNH, and since you can only have 1 or 0 as a bit, both of those should be reserved for the network id and the broadcast, yeah?[/QUOTE]
Correct. There's a good chance he's also not using "Windows authentication", but rather something like PEAP-MSCHAPv2
The OP does a very poor job in explaining the actual procedures, or how things work (if explained at all.)
Also, Most Atheros chipsets works the best without any issues, not realtek.
[QUOTE=hexpunK;29356471]Broadcasting data erryday. Who needs unique IP addresses.[/QUOTE]
but I'm pretty sure you need an IP address, static or unique or anything, to use anything at the IP layer.
[editline]22nd April 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=gparent;29356633]Correct. There's a good chance he's also not using "Windows authentication", but rather something like PEAP-MSCHAPv2[/QUOTE]
I don't even know what Windows authentication is, lol
[QUOTE=ze beaver;29355899]You're an asshole.
Unless you live in a place where data caps are a thing of the past.
My neighbor used to connect on my wireless network to download his shit. At the time, there was a 7$ fee for every gigabyte you download over your limit until you reached 30 GB.
210$ in additional fees + the 40$ the shitty connection cost :colbert:[/QUOTE]
It's called court, he was STEALING from you
[QUOTE=Tralisk;29351211]Though I dislike how you posted this as it encourages poor behaviour by unethical people, it is informative.[/QUOTE]
People who can't manage to create sophisticated passwords need to learn to do so.
I like how you made a slide show presentation for forum viewing, nice touch.
[QUOTE=Kwaq;29357125]I like how you made a slide show presentation for forum viewing, nice touch.[/QUOTE]
Learn to fucking read, his university made it.
[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;29356864]what kind of fucked up place still uses data caps
jesus christ i mean seriously if your isp does its time for change, shit's dumb as shit[/QUOTE]
We only have 2 ISPs here
The price is about the same and the data caps are just as bad :canada:
[editline]22nd April 2011[/editline]
Anyway, if anyone wants to get into their neighbor's network, [url=http://www.dealextreme.com/p/802-11g-b-54mbps-usb-wireless-adapter-with-detachable-antenna-29088]this[/url] should be useful.
Look on Ebay for cheaper prices and shorter shipping though.
[QUOTE=Tools;29352116]Hah, I'm behind WPA2-Enterprise without SSID broadcasting, on a /31 subnet network that requires Windows authentication.
It'll take you a massive 7 minutes extra more to get through. :science:[/QUOTE]
I've somewhat debated about setting up a RADIUS server on the old laptop myself.
I wonder how long it is until a Facepuncher's neighbour gets arrested because of CP being downloaded on their network...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
