[quote]The marketing materials say Syndicate will “transport millions of gamers to an astonishing recreation of London during the Industrial Revolution where they will find themselves immersed in a game world they'll have to see to believe."[/quote]
Prepare for disaster
[QUOTE=itisjuly;47702049]Prepare for disaster[/QUOTE]
A nicely crafted but not working disaster.*
I am prepared for November to drop to my knees, look to the sky and yell "THEY LEARNED NOTHIIIIING!" when this one turns out to be just as terrible as Unity.
[QUOTE=ironman17;47702400]I am prepared for November to drop to my knees, look to the sky and yell "THEY LEARNED NOTHIIIIING!" when this one turns out to be just as terrible as Unity.[/QUOTE]
Everyone thought that about pre AC4 after how bad AC3 was and it turned out good. I'm expecting this to be good because they've probably learned more of the new engine.
[QUOTE=Mr. Agree;47702744]Everyone thought that about pre AC4 after how bad AC3 was and it turned out good. I'm expecting this to be good because they've probably learned more of the new engine.[/QUOTE]
Unity was on the same engine as III, Liberation (which ran on the Vita), and IV.
[QUOTE=Durrsly;47703277]Unity was on the same engine as III, Liberation (which ran on the Vita), and IV.[/QUOTE]Unity was not on the same engine. It was heavily modified in both visuals and physics. That's why it ran like shit and was buggy as hell.
Watch as most of the world goes "Meh" but still buy it because they are dumb and complain that the game suck, before drooling over the new AC game coming in like 5 months.
Why is it still going on?
[QUOTE=itisjuly;47703359]Unity was not on the same engine. It was heavily modified in both visuals and physics. That's why it ran like shit and was buggy as hell.[/QUOTE]
While I can understand the graphical modifications would contribute to the game running poorly (I believe Ubisoft once said they were working far beyond the limits of DirectX, I think a forced annual release contributed more than any engine overhaul.
[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;47703403]Watch as most of the world goes "Meh" but still buy it because they are dumb and complain that the game suck, before drooling over the new AC game coming in like 5 months.
Why is it still going on?[/QUOTE]
Honestly, the games are [i]impressive,[/i] even if they're not always [i]good.[/i] After 3 and Unity I wouldn't dream of buying one on the launch day, but I definitely see the appeal; there's no better way to walk around a historical city, and the actual missions can be pretty cool as well.
Hopefully they'll get their act together and start putting out more like 2 and Black Flag, which were both quite solid.
[QUOTE=Durrsly;47703439]While I can understand the graphical modifications would contribute to the game running poorly (I believe Ubisoft once said they were working far beyond the limits of DirectX, I think a forced annual release contributed more than any engine overhaul.[/QUOTE]
True but in case of reusing same engine like the did with Rogue meant a lot less problems.
Victory uses Unity engine which has been more polished so it should be better. But it's Ubi so who knows.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
