Why don't you just let the people who ARE going to make the game, make the game.
Stalker is too great a series to die because some meddling kids flipped over the mystery van.
Give it to those who care for it, fuck whoever's being a spoiled little shit about it with the "if I can't have it, nobody can" mentality.
[QUOTE=DeeCeeTeeBee;38820647]Why don't you just let the people who ARE going to make the game, make the game.
Stalker is too great a series to die because some meddling kids flipped over the mystery van.[/QUOTE]
To be honest I'd rather have no new stalker game than a shitty stalker game.
fuck GSC
[QUOTE=Crimor;38820821]To be honest I'd rather have no new stalker game than a shitty stalker game.[/QUOTE]
better yet, GSC continues work on the already-begun STALKER 2, and bitcomposer makes their own shockingly similar series
twice the stalker, twice the [del]fun[/del] radiation poisoning?
Bitcomposer isn't going to do fuckall with STALKER, give it all to GSC
[QUOTE=Crimor;38820821]To be honest I'd rather have no new stalker game than a shitty stalker game.[/QUOTE]
This kind of mentality would have kept us all in the dark ages. I say bring on a shitty Stalker game if that's what moving forward will cost. We still have the old slow boring and broken 3 titles on Steam. They won't magically get ruined by progress just because new games are made.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;38823108]We still have the [B][I]old slow boring and broken[/I][/B] 3 titles on Steam. [/QUOTE]
I'm sorry but what
[QUOTE=Cone;38824674]I'm sorry but what[/QUOTE]
Only 3 of those are true.
Old Slow Fun and Broken.
[QUOTE=cccritical;38820918]better yet, GSC continues work on the already-begun STALKER 2, and bitcomposer makes their own shockingly similar series
twice the stalker, twice the [del]fun[/del] radiation poisoning?[/QUOTE]
Pretty much everyone at gsc got laid off and went to vostok studios
what the article SAYS is that bitcomposer claims to have the rights, but GSC says they only have the rights to the [I]books[/I], not the games. So GSC can still make the games (if they're somehow able to in the future), and bitcomposer can make SIMILAR games, but not stalker games.
[QUOTE=Schmaaa;38825219]what the article SAYS is that bitcomposer claims to have the rights, but GSC says they only have the rights to the [I]books[/I], not the games. So GSC can still make the games (if they're somehow able to in the future), and bitcomposer can make SIMILAR games, but not stalker games.[/QUOTE]
[url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079944/]Stalker[/url] games but not STALKER games.
the Stalker film deserves a better game maker than BitComposer
[QUOTE=cccritical;38820918]better yet, GSC continues work on the already-begun STALKER 2, and bitcomposer makes their own shockingly similar series
twice the stalker, twice the [del]fun[/del] radiation poisoning?[/QUOTE]GSC doesn't have any developers anymore though, just hope Sergiy dies off or sells the IP to THQ or Vostok Games or any other logical choice.
[QUOTE=DeeCeeTeeBee;38820647]Why don't you just let the people who ARE going to make the game, make the game.
Stalker is too great a series to die because some meddling kids flipped over the mystery van.[/QUOTE]
Money will never stop people.
[editline]14th December 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Lizzrd;38825587]GSC doesn't have any developers anymore though, just hope Sergiy dies off or sells the IP to THQ or Vostok Games or any other logical choice.[/QUOTE]
4A should have it.
Buying rights =/= Making a game.
[QUOTE=kimr120;38825642]Money will never stop people.
[editline]14th December 2012[/editline]
4A should have it.[/QUOTE]
I'd rather they continue with Metro though.
[QUOTE=alien_guy;38829687]I'd rather they continue with Metro though.[/QUOTE]
Well they are a small studio so you have a point that it would disrupt the development of the Metro series.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
