Details of Nvidia's replacement for the aging GT250 cards, the Fermi-based GT430 budget-range model, have leaked ahead of its official announcement thanks to some over-eager Best Buy employees.
The GT430 range isn't due for launch until the 10th of this month, but employees at Best Buy stores across the US apparently missed a memo - and have been sticking the cards on the shelf ready for sale.
Zorbas, a member of the EVGA Forums, was able to snap some detailed shots of the boxes, including images of the detailed specifications on the side.
It looks like the first models, including the Galaxy-branded version that Zorbas snapped, will feature 96 stream processors, a 700MHz GPU clock and 1600MHz memory clock running on a 128-bit interface.
Sauce:[url]http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2010/10/04/nvidia-gt430-cards-leak/1[/url]
For a second there I thought they were actually leaking something.
Well, let's have a price first, and then we talk about if this card is needed.
Jesus Christ nVidia, stop making shitty low end cards and release the damn dual-fermi card already
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25246250]Jesus Christ nVidia, stop making shitty low end cards and release the damn dual-fermi card already[/QUOTE]
"Furnace" edition.
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;25246250]Jesus Christ nVidia, stop making shitty low end cards and release the damn dual-fermi card already[/QUOTE]
Imagine two 480 chips on a board.
You would be able to do barbecue on it.
Asus MARS II. Also, I'm sure there wold be a way to manage the heat.
It wouldnt' be too bad if they move onto liquid cooling as the solution by attaching a preinstalled waterblock to the card.I'm pretty sure for the ones who can afford a card like that, can afford to build a LCS.
[QUOTE=Richard Simmons;25250240]Imagine two 480 chips on a board.
You would be able to do barbecue on it.[/QUOTE]
octosli you could cremate a man
They should codename the dual 480 "Inferno" hurr
[QUOTE=FlashStock;25249207]"Furnace" edition.[/QUOTE]
GF104 wanted me to pass on a message
it was "you are an idiot"
[QUOTE=johan_sm;25245344]For a second there I thought they were actually leaking something.[/QUOTE]
Same, I was expecting a story about faulty capacitors or something.
Following standard Nvidia Business model, wont they release the 495 as a dual gf104 board cut down to 460 size.
Eg two 460's not dual 480's
it wouldn't have been dual 480s anyway, more like two 475s or 470s
[QUOTE=reapaninja;25250801]GF104 wanted me to pass on a message
it was "you are an idiot"[/QUOTE]
who da fuck is gf104
[QUOTE=Ultralast;25266771]who da fuck is gf104[/QUOTE]
obviously his 104th girlfriend.
[QUOTE=FlashStock;25266817]obviously his 104th boyfriend.[/QUOTE]
ah yeah
Why do they keep giving low end cards huge amounts of memory at slow speed? It doesn't make sense.
[QUOTE=Inacio;25267110]Sure there would. Watercooling.
LOL DAM.
:smug:[/QUOTE]
What about that 6970 they are making?
I have a nice case for it:
[IMG]http://www.sinous.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/aircraft-carrier.jpg[/IMG]
See? It's not very funny.
[editline]04:47PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=y0haN;25268191]Why do they keep giving low end cards huge amounts of memory at slow speed? It doesn't make sense.[/QUOTE]
We kind of ditched memories under 512MB in desktops two gens ago.
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;25268209]What about that 6970 they are making?
I have a nice case for it:
[IMG]http://www.sinous.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/aircraft-carrier.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
You also need a PSU that can output enough power for it
[img]http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/nuclear%20power%20plant.jpg[/img]
hurp durp :bandwagon:
[QUOTE=y0haN;25268191]Why do they keep giving low end cards huge amounts of memory at slow speed? It doesn't make sense.[/QUOTE]
For dealing with larger textures.
DING!
The 430s are released unto the unclean masses.
Sources say improvement over GT 220, not much new if you compare it to a 5670.
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;25359336]DING!
The 430s are released unto the unclean masses.
Sources say improvement over GT 220, not much new if you compare it to a 5670.[/QUOTE]
I was hoping it would perform closer to a GTS 250, 9800GTX, 4830, or 4770 :frown:
[QUOTE=FlashStock;25249207]"Furnace" edition.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://gyazo.com/e57006d42b2c09ce0488cc74e1bb8f36.png[/img]
People who can't take a joke.
[QUOTE=gerbile5;25367511][img_thumb]http://gyazo.com/e57006d42b2c09ce0488cc74e1bb8f36.png[/img_thumb]
People who can't take a joke.[/QUOTE]
People who are tired of shitposters shitposting.
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;25359336]DING!
The 430s are released unto the unclean masses.
Sources say improvement over GT 220, not much new if you compare it to a 5670.[/QUOTE]
I read that it's barely beating the 5570 in some benchmarks.
[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;25359336]DING!
The 430s are released unto the unclean masses.
Sources say improvement over GT 220, not much new if you compare it to a 5670.[/QUOTE]
I had a GT220 once, they were quite great, FOR anything OTHER THAN CRYSIS >.>
so fucking cute
[editline]12th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=~Kiwi~;25369638]I had a GT220 once, they were quite great, FOR anything OTHER THAN CRYSIS >.>[/QUOTE]not really
[editline]12th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=FlashStock;25249207]"Furnace" edition.[/QUOTE]
that's funny yeah but gf104 (as mentioned) is a revision that runs substantially cooler so not really clever
[editline]12th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Richard Simmons;25250240]Imagine two 480 chips on a board.
You would be able to do barbecue on it.[/QUOTE]
but you actually cannot boil an egg how could you barbecue
[QUOTE=Makol;25369520]I read that it's barely beating the 5570 in some benchmarks.[/QUOTE]
It's because it is a DDR3 version. the 5670 and 5570 are both GDDR5
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
