this video is from fucking e3. seriously, after this and the skyrim console command article I think it's time for this bot to leave and never come back.
[QUOTE=Bruhmis;48626063]this video is from fucking e3. seriously, after this and the skyrim console command article I think it's time for this bot to leave and never come back.[/QUOTE]
The video was uploaded 2 days ago.
While the footage is from E3, this video about it is new.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;48627395]The video was uploaded 2 days ago.
While the footage is from E3, this video about it is new.[/QUOTE]
I don't really think that changes the fact that either way whoever made the article is late as fuck
[QUOTE=Bruhmis;48626063]this video is from fucking e3. seriously, after this and the skyrim console command article I think it's time for this bot to leave and never come back.[/QUOTE]
I wish I didn't see people grasping at straws to get PCGamesN banned every time I went to an article that has something remotely unsatisfactory.
[QUOTE=Loadingue;48627646]I wish I didn't see people grasping at straws to get PCGamesN banned every time I went to an article that has something remotely unsatisfactory.[/QUOTE]
It's posted every time a news source posts one or two sub-par articles. Fun fact, every news site has some stinkers. It's a universal fact.
[QUOTE=Loadingue;48627646]I wish I didn't see people grasping at straws to get PCGamesN banned every time I went to an article that has something remotely unsatisfactory.[/QUOTE]
I wish I didnt see so many shit articles written by PCGamesN. No one would want it banned if it wasnt consistently shit. Its far more shit than it is good. Doesnt matter some are good, its bad too much of the time.
[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;48628332]I wish I didnt see so many shit articles written by PCGamesN. No one would want it banned if it wasnt consistently shit. Its far more shit than it is good. Doesnt matter some are good, its bad too much of the time.[/QUOTE]
Consistently shit? Or do you just ignore every other article?
I look through the 3 last pages of ITNN threads, and I see 3 articles that have over 20 "Dumb" ratings, one of these was regarding the news itself, not the article. So 2 articles, out of over 100, over the course of more than a week.
Would you believe me if I told you that no news website posts perfectly flawless, interesting and relevant articles 100% of the time?
[QUOTE=Loadingue;48627646]I wish I didn't see people grasping at straws to get PCGamesN banned every time I went to an article that has something remotely unsatisfactory.[/QUOTE]
grasping at straws? they made a fucking article about console commands in skyrim in [B]2015[/B]. what is it going to take to cross the line from "remotely unsatisfactory" to literal shitposting? do they need to start putting up articles that are just a single minecraft screenshot with no text?
[editline]6th September 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=Loadingue;48628867]Consistently shit? Or do you just ignore every other article?
I look through the 3 last pages of ITNN threads, and I see 3 articles that have over 20 "Dumb" ratings, one of these was regarding the news itself, not the article. So 2 articles, out of over 100, over the course of more than a week.
Would you believe me if I told you that no news website posts perfectly flawless, interesting and relevant articles 100% of the time?[/QUOTE]
this is the only bot that is legitimately posting half a decade old plagarized content for literally no reason. sometimes the bbc bot makes a bad post, sometimes ModDB posts about an extremely bad mod that changes a texture in Mount & blade or something, but nobody is calling for these bots to be banned. there's a reason PCgamesN is singled out.
[QUOTE=Bruhmis;48629289]grasping at straws? they made a fucking article about console commands in skyrim in [B]2015[/B]. what is it going to take to cross the line from "remotely unsatisfactory" to literal shitposting? do they need to start putting up articles that are just a single minecraft screenshot with no text?
[editline]6th September 2015[/editline]
this is the only bot that is legitimately posting half a decade old plagarized content for literally no reason. sometimes the bbc bot makes a bad post, sometimes ModDB posts about an extremely bad mod that changes a texture in Mount & blade or something, but nobody is calling for these bots to be banned. there's a reason PCgamesN is singled out.[/QUOTE]
it sounds like you really know jack shit about software or scripts in this case the bot is doing what it's told and it is told to post threads with the accompanying article. If your must persist on being pissed off be pissed off at the article creators
[QUOTE=confinedUser;48630996]it sounds like you really know jack shit about software or scripts in this case the bot is doing what it's told and it is told to post threads with the accompanying article. If your must persist on being pissed off be pissed off at the article creators[/QUOTE]
I don't think I've ever received such an utterly pointless response. you're trying to turn the issue of a news site's lack of quality into a debate about my knowledge of scripting? what?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
