• We talk to lawyers about the No Man's Sky false advertising investigation
    7 replies, posted
[url]http://www.pcgamer.com/no-mans-sky-lawsuit[/url]
This bit from the last two paragraphs seem to be summing up the analysis pretty succinctly: [quote]McArthur foresees a similar outcome, stating that "the biggest impact here will be that it sends a message to other game companies to be careful about what they put in their trailers and not to oversell their games with unrealistic 'gameplay footage.'" After restating [b]his belief that Hello Games has neither broken the law nor purposely deceived any of its players[/b], Morrison closes with a piece of advice it's always worth reiterating: "People need to stop pre-ordering games."[/quote] And before people start arguing about the bolded part, I'd like to mention that the lawyer-consulting article does examine both the trailer footage and the comments the devs made, and it also compares it to similar old cases like Aliens: Colonial Marines.
That's about as truthful as hillary's email investigation.
[QUOTE=Marik Bentusi;51132279] And before people start arguing about the bolded part, I'd like to mention that the lawyer-consulting article does examine both the trailer footage and the comments the devs made, and it also compares it to similar old cases like Aliens: Colonial Marines.[/QUOTE] They most certainly lied and purposely deceived their players, if that lawyer examined the comments and trailers properly he would know that, its abundantly clear. The only thing a lawyer is qualified to state anything about is whether the evidence is damning enough for a favorable ruling, which often, especially in an untouched area of law like video game false advertising, requires a huge burden of evidence far in excess of what any reasonable person would decide is clearly lying to customers.
[QUOTE=Marik Bentusi;51132279]This bit from the last two paragraphs seem to be summing up the analysis pretty succinctly: And before people start arguing about the bolded part, I'd like to mention that the lawyer-consulting article does examine both the trailer footage and the comments the devs made, and it also compares it to similar old cases like Aliens: Colonial Marines.[/QUOTE] There's a difference between unrealistic gameplay footage and outright not having half the content from the trailer in the final build.
[QUOTE]Videos and screenshots depict the ideal planets, the ideal wildlife, the ideal experience--and that's not necessarily what everyone's going to get[/QUOTE] But that's what less than half of the complaints are about. Missing game mechanics and other features. It's not only about what the animals look like or the density [editline]30th September 2016[/editline] The lawyers did no research
[QUOTE=Marik Bentusi;51132279]Aliens: Colonial Marines.[/QUOTE] but A:CM was a success??? randy pitchford said that himself so it much be true!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.