Oh boy, that's a really nice way for DICE to say, "You're getting the same thing you've gotten for the past 3 years! Also, fuck you!"
[QUOTE=RichyZ;45158064]visceral is doing the sp, which actually looks kinda interesting (big open levels with a lot of ways of doing the objective, less cinematic bullshit)[/QUOTE]
But they also did Dead Space 3 and Army of Two: The Devil's Cartel. I'm not very optimistic, but hey, maybe I'll be blown away
Suuuuuure it won't
[QUOTE=RichyZ;45158773]dead space 3 was fun and army of two was very likely the b team[/QUOTE]
Yeah, DS3 was fun, but Dead Space 2 was a billion times better. Even the multiplayer was better.
Nah. They'll still find a way to make it bad.
[img]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/battlefield%20hardline%20single%20player%20stuff.jpg[/img]
wow how is it even possible to create such fucking boring looking protagonists?
[QUOTE=Mooe94;45159063][img]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/battlefield%20hardline%20single%20player%20stuff.jpg[/img]
wow how is it even possible to create such fucking boring looking protagonists?[/QUOTE]
i'm not sure if they know how to render faces - go check medal of honor 2010 cutscenes, and the main protags daugter
[QUOTE=Mooe94;45159063][img]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/battlefield%20hardline%20single%20player%20stuff.jpg[/img]
wow how is it even possible to create such fucking boring looking protagonists?[/QUOTE]
I think they look decent, albeit a bit boring. That are some nice jackets though.
they almost look like ken dolls
[editline]19th June 2014[/editline]
but whatever im sure they'll look better later
Didn't they say pretty much the same thing about BF4?
At this point in time I'm surprised they just don't give up. I wouldn't mind a MP-only Battlefield if they knocked 20 bucks off the price.
The only singleplayer I'd want in a Battlefield game is "Multiplayer maps with Bots". Why not just do that? It can't be that hard, that's what they used to do with 1942, Vietnam, and BF2 (did 2142 do it, too? I don't remember).
[QUOTE=zombays;45158987]Yeah, DS3 was fun, but Dead Space 2 was a billion times better. Even the multiplayer was better.[/QUOTE]
DS3 didn't have multiplayer, only co-op which is infinitely better.
Wow... Cynicism.
I know you'll all hate me for saying this, but how about we wait until the game's actually out before we start passing judgments on a single player we know nothing about? For all we know, it could be GTA:V in a silicone mask.
If I wanted depressing cynicism, negativity, and hate, I'd go watch a TotalBiscuit video. That's not why I come here.
Stop whining, and act like the grown men and women you are.
[QUOTE=Mooe94;45159063][img]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/battlefield%20hardline%20single%20player%20stuff.jpg[/img]
wow how is it even possible to create such fucking boring looking protagonists?[/QUOTE]
I didn't know the plot of the game was about cloning.
[QUOTE=Mooe94;45159063][img]http://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/default/files/battlefield%20hardline%20single%20player%20stuff.jpg[/img]
wow how is it even possible to create such fucking boring looking protagonists?[/QUOTE]
The guy on the left looks like Johnny Knoxville
[QUOTE=Xenomoose;45159660]The only singleplayer I'd want in a Battlefield game is "Multiplayer maps with Bots". Why not just do that? It can't be that hard, that's what they used to do with 1942, Vietnam, and BF2 (did 2142 do it, too? I don't remember).[/QUOTE]
BC1 had a similar style, but with a story added on.
We'll see how it is. What they said sounds promising but will they actually live up to that?
So it's gonna be a rollercoaster ride where we get to choose how we sit along the way.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
