I am happy with my 32" 720p from 2004 and I intend to be happy with it for at least another 12 years.
22k for a 90" 4K monitor isn't actually that bad of a deal. It doesn't specifically say it's OLED, but if it were it would be a steal in my mind for that price.
Even regular backlit LCD would be good for that price. Since 4K already is damn pricy, and 90" ontop of that.
That's useful when the highest resolution movies available are in 1080p.
Wouldn't mind a 4k 32" monitor.
imagine using that for your monitor
would be fucking insane.
Soon, I'll finally be able to buy Frank a 2000 inch tv.
[QUOTE=Kljunas;37356299]That's useful when the higher resolution movies available are in 1080p.[/QUOTE]
I've never understood why you'd need a big TV if you only use it to watch movies and TV, personally. 720p is more then enough for me to see everything I need to see. Hell I'd suffice with 480p. You get a few extra pixels but they have, in my opinion, never added to the experience of a movie or TV for me. It adds no practical value and is for all intensive purposes a gimmick-y reason to upgrade from your previous TV and a marketing ploy directed towards a susceptible consumer culture.
[QUOTE=Kljunas;37356299]That's useful when the highest resolution movies available are in 1080p.[/QUOTE]
Four of them. At full size. At the same time.
[QUOTE=Kljunas;37356299]That's useful when the highest resolution movies available are in 1080p.[/QUOTE]
Haha, no.
4k film are available for sale, but rather rare right now. But the person spending 22k on a 4k screen isn't using it for his bluray collection.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;37356443]Haha, no.
4k film are available for sale, but rather rare right now. But the person spending 22k on a 4k screen isn't using it for his bluray collection.[/QUOTE]
Where can you get them?
Films could easily be sold in 4k since thats the res of cinema screens.
I like how people think larger is better, while all it does is reduces the DPI of the screen, I still say the best TV size is 40"-52" for 1080
[QUOTE=viperfan7;37356585]I like how people think larger is better, while all it does is reduces the DPI of the screen, I still say the best TV size is 40"-52" for 1080[/QUOTE]
Not if it supports 4K. Which it does.
[QUOTE=mac338;37356596]Not if it supports 4K. Which it does.[/QUOTE]
The dpi of the screen is 52
A 30" 4K screen would be the best, you would presumably need thunderbolt for the connection though, actually displayport would work.
[QUOTE=alien_guy;37356706]The dpi of the screen is 52
A 30" 4K screen would be the best, you would presumably need thunderbolt for the connection though, actually displayport would work.[/QUOTE]
or you can just use HDMI like most TVs do, I think that would be able to handle 4K
[QUOTE=Brt5470;37356443]Haha, no.
4k film are available for sale, but rather rare right now. But the person spending 22k on a 4k screen isn't using it for his bluray collection.[/QUOTE]
4k films really? On which support?
[editline]22nd August 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=viperfan7;37356880]or you can just use HDMI like most TVs do, I think that would be able to handle 4K[/QUOTE]
1080p 3D films (= 60 fps) are the maximum HDMI can do iirc. So they can't handle 4k properly.
[QUOTE=Kljunas;37356883]4k films really? [B]On which support?[/B]
[editline]22nd August 2012[/editline]
1080p 3D films (= 60 fps) are the maximum HDMI can do iirc. So they can't handle 4k properly.[/QUOTE]
Err, what?
Modern film raws are recorded at 4K, you know?
Also, Dual link DVI supports 4K resolutions.
Realistically, you would be using a very, very high spec PC for things like this
Coming soon:TVs bigger than your field of vision.
Are the ladies included? Then it's an insta-buy!
[QUOTE=BloodFox1222;37357431]Coming soon:TVs bigger than your field of vision.[/QUOTE]
iMax.
[QUOTE=BloodFox1222;37357431]Coming soon:TVs bigger than your field of vision.[/QUOTE]
And it's a TV so it'll be 800x600.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/Digital_video_resolutions_%28VCD_to_4K%29.svg/800px-Digital_video_resolutions_%28VCD_to_4K%29.svg.png[/img]
does this help?
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;37357408]Err, what?
Modern film raws are recorded at 4K, you know?
Also, Dual link DVI supports 4K resolutions.
Realistically, you would be using a very, very high spec PC for things like this[/QUOTE]
I know films are recorded on very high resolutions since ages, but I was wondering where and in which form one could buy that.
[QUOTE=Reds;37356337]Soon, I'll finally be able to buy Frank a 2000 inch tv.[/QUOTE]
Can't wait to watch The Simpsons from 30 blocks away.
[QUOTE=Kljunas;37357581]I know films are recorded on very high resolutions since ages, but I was wondering where and in which form one could buy that.[/QUOTE]
You would need your own little server just for films if you had them [I]all[/I] in 4k, because filesizes become huge.
Well HTPCs are becoming commonplace and the average computer has one or two terabytes of storage so I don't see that being impossible.
For around $25k you could get that, an HTPC/NAS for your films, and a great surround system.
[QUOTE=trotskygrad;37357453][img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/Digital_video_resolutions_%28VCD_to_4K%29.svg/800px-Digital_video_resolutions_%28VCD_to_4K%29.svg.png[/img]
does this help?[/QUOTE]
The TV is actually QFHD though.
[img]http://static.stuff-review.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/hd-resolutions-1704.png[/img]
[QUOTE=alien_guy;37357867]The TV is actually QFHD though.
[img]http://static.stuff-review.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/hd-resolutions-1704.png[/img][/QUOTE]
0/10 wouldn't buy
Where does it say that, though?
[QUOTE=latin_geek;37357879]0/10 wouldn't buy
Where does it say that, though?[/QUOTE]
"LG's screen offers 8 million pixels per frame, four times the resolution of 1080p high-definition displays."
1920x2 = 3840
1080x2 = 2160
I dunno, 4K sounds pretty futuristic and has a ring to it. Or 4X, being exactly four times bigger than 1080p.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
