So I recorded myself reading wikipedia articles while getting speech jammed - General

So I had this awesome idea of trying to read wikipedia articles while getting speech jammed using Stutterbox, I recorded it using Vocaroo. Couldn't finish this one: [quote] Article: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florian_Andrighetto[/url] My attempt: [url]http://vocaroo.com/i/s1U8BGwPOjm4[/url][/quote] So I try another: [quote] Article: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hentz,_Reid_%26_Adler[/url] My Attempt: [url]http://vocaroo.com/i/s00h5Sx2jg2P[/url][/quote] So another Facepuncher suggested I tried out spreeder while getting speech jammed. Gonna try this now. [editline]13th April 2015[/editline] Edit: I can't even do that, even on the lowest possible setting(that definately isn't 1 word per minute) it's not working. God I sound so fucked up when I try to read these things, but I am taking requests if you think something would be funny to be read loudly by a speech jammed dude. You could do it yourself, for extra awkward credits!

wow that seriously fucks with you

[QUOTE=Unreliable;47515740]wow that seriously fucks with you[/QUOTE] Yeah it does and I think it's fucking hilarious. A friend sent me this pastebin and it just sounds so fucking weird and NSFW: [url]http://pastebin.com/Dn51fHCx[/url] I might consider recording myself reading this, but it's up for grabs if anybody dares trying this :v: Disclaimer: I am not on any psychoactives, the only thing besides speech jammer that fucks with me is slight sleep deprivation. Update: Got Spredder working. Gonna smoke then I'll come back and see if I can fart out something :v:

this is placebo

[QUOTE=bitches;47520350]this is placebo[/QUOTE] Would you elaborate? I didn't believe in this but having your own voice echo back into your speakers at that exact latency is distracting as fuck to me and a load of other people.

Yeah, I keep trying this at different delay settings and it doesn't do shit for me. Am I doing it wrong?

[QUOTE=Raptortheawesome;47521404]Yeah, I keep trying this at different delay settings and it doesn't do shit for me. Am I doing it wrong?[/QUOTE] Same, only words I fuck up are the words I'd fuck up even without having the playback on.

I don't think imagine it being a problem because singers and speakers deal with it just fine right?

When I missed around with the concept on a friend's mac, we had to change it by .1 seconds a few times to see which got us the best results. Not everyone is effected. Have an article of a guy doing real research into it: [url=https://sites.google.com/site/qurihara/top-english/speechjammer] Linkity [/url]

I think it works better if it's playing back at a louder volume than your own voice; this way it becomes what you primarily hear and it fucks you up

[QUOTE=wauterboi;47522110]I don't think imagine it being a problem because singers and speakers deal with it just fine right?[/QUOTE] You can make sound play back through headphones with imperceptible delay.

[QUOTE=Raptortheawesome;47521404]Yeah, I keep trying this at different delay settings and it doesn't do shit for me. Am I doing it wrong?[/QUOTE] 200 ms to 210 ms should do the job, so 0.2 or 0.21 I think.

What is Speech jammed?

[QUOTE=Clavin;47529386]What is Speech jammed?[/QUOTE] Basically its when you run a program or use a device that echos your speech back into your ears, usually a very specific delay in milliseconds has an effect, for me its 200 to 210 ms and it seems to work like that for a lot of people. Try putting on stutterbox and try and say a whole sentence with it, works for some and doesn't for some other.