Nice to see these in higher resolution.
Some of them have been around for a while but they were pretty low resolution.
Alt-Maul looks like the chillest nigga from the hood. I would love to see a short movie where Alt-Maul tackles black American issues a la Black Panther or something in that vein.
--wait a minute, wrong game.
I NEED this game!!
I hope it see's the light of day at some point.
This is really frustrating to read about. Its so interesting and cool.
I've never been so upset about losing a game I never even thought was developed.
These Sith versions of heroes look The Old Republic style and it's amazing. I'd love to see the alt designs for soldiers, if they had any.
[QUOTE=The Terminator;53199643]I've never been so upset about losing a game I never even thought was developed.[/QUOTE]
It was mostly concept art, BF3 wasn’t even finished
I gotta say I really love Redeemed Vader and Dark Obi-Wan. Something that bothers me is they removed Maul's tattoos for the Jedi version and I can kinda understand why, but Zabrak facial tattoos have little to nothing to do with Force affiliation, it's more a rite of passage thing, though there can be other reasons.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;53199725]It was mostly concept art, BF3 wasn’t even finished[/QUOTE]
It was basically finished from what we know, besides like bug fixing.
[QUOTE=The Terminator;53200198]It was basically finished from what we know, besides like bug fixing.[/QUOTE]
That's an exaggeration to rile up the fans.
It was more like late alpha or early beta. Feature complete but not finished.
And Free radical brought it a pon themselves, they were missing deadlines and late on other stuff, LucasArts canned it because it was draining money.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/5geuXg7.png[/img]
This seems like they put more thought into it than anything EA has or ever will do with the franchise as long as their design philosophy is "I mean yeah if anyone at DICE has free time then I guess we'll let them work on it"
"""Battlefront""" felt like a content-barren cash-in and """Battlefront 2""" was obviously a lot less empty but also a [I]lot[/I] more "cash-in"
[QUOTE=gk99;53201189][IMG]https://i.imgur.com/5geuXg7.png[/IMG]
This seems like they put more thought into it than anything EA has or ever will do with the franchise as long as their design philosophy is "I mean yeah if anyone at DICE has free time then I guess we'll let them work on it"
"""Battlefront""" felt like a content-barren cash-in and """Battlefront 2""" was obviously a lot less empty but also a [I]lot[/I] more "cash-in"[/QUOTE]
like, i get that they're dumbed-down arcadey games but the DICE battlefronts look really damn good and the level of detail they have in recreating shit from the movies is honestly pretty impressive
i feel like "these straps on his boots represent the dark side's hold on him!" is sort of an absurd thing to say, let alone hold highly
[QUOTE=Simplemac3;53201240]like, i get that they're dumbed-down arcadey games but the DICE battlefronts look really damn good and the level of detail they have in recreating shit from the movies is honestly pretty impressive
i feel like "these straps on his boots represent the dark side's hold on him!" is sort of an absurd thing to say, let alone hold highly[/QUOTE]
Yeah tbh I don't really care how pretty the game looks or how they actually did their jobs and put shit from the movies of which the game is based on into the game. There is [I]zero[/I] creativity in that, that's just how DICE operates. They make pretty shooters with big open maps all on the same engine that seems to be impossible to make a bad-looking game on.
Putting some thought into [I]original[/I] designs is more impressive to me than "look we made battlefield 2043 lite"
[editline]a[/editline]
Honestly I haven't given a shit about graphics since Crysis, back when I was a literal fucking child. It's meaningless. "The game looks good" yeah so does every triple-A game from the last decade, that's not neat, that's par.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
