I really am.
Original:
[img]http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/3457/originalao.png[/img]
PS'd:
[img]http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/8449/amazingo.png[/img]
DISCUSS
That actually looks pretty bad.
I know this is nit picky but you can see some jaggies on the Ps'd picture where the rock was removed.
But overall it is a decent program.
[img_thumb]http://benbrooks.co.uk/img/bra.jpg[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://benbrooks.co.uk/img/nobra.jpg[/img_thumb]
[editline]02:47AM[/editline]
I tried...
[QUOTE=sbradford26;21682666]That actually looks pretty bad.[/QUOTE]
I know. I havent done any touch ups on it, just the content aware fill.
[editline]06:50PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=rieda1589;21682780][img_thumb]http://benbrooks.co.uk/img/bra.jpg[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://benbrooks.co.uk/img/nobra.jpg[/img_thumb]
[editline]02:47AM[/editline]
I tried...[/QUOTE]
Haha. We're cool.
It did a fantastic job with filling in the sky.
At first I was thinking "I'm not seeing the difference..." then it was "Oh shit!"
Yeah, that's pretty cool, I need to get the trial version and check it out.
[QUOTE=rieda1589;21682780][img_thumb]http://benbrooks.co.uk/img/bra.jpg[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://benbrooks.co.uk/img/nobra.jpg[/img_thumb]
[editline]02:47AM[/editline]
I tried...[/QUOTE]
Winner x1.
The OP needs to understand that removing an connective object usually requires more than one step, even with CS5, to smooth and balance out the edge where the previous object was located.
[QUOTE=lemonlimecom;21682899]It did a fantastic job with filling in the sky.[/QUOTE]
Yeah! It is great. I just spent 15 minutes on this:
[img]http://www.usawebexperts.com/DesertRockd3.jpg[/img]
into
[img]http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/5882/epicwin.png[/img]
Pretty good. I only used content aware.
[editline]07:10PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;21683123]The OP needs to understand that removing an connective object usually requires more than one step, even with CS5, to smooth and balance out the edge where the previous object was located.[/QUOTE]
I do understand. Its still pretty good.
[editline]07:11PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;21683082]At first I was thinking "I'm not seeing the difference..." then it was "Oh shit!"
Yeah, that's pretty cool, I need to get the trial version and check it out.[/QUOTE]
Yeah. Plus the size is kept relevantly the same. The trial is only about 1 GB.
CS5 is awesome, but you fail at content aware fill.
[QUOTE=MrDoctor;21683267]CS5 is awesome, but you fail at content aware fill.[/QUOTE]
I know v:v:v
I am [b]not[/b] an artist. I mainly am a programmer. The best anything iv'e ever drawn is some heart for my ex. I am downloading Flash CS5 and Catalyst CS5 right now. I am [b][u]VERY[/u][/b] exited for catalyst.
On this last one, it looks like a Predator, in invisible camo, is standing there.
Hehe, content aware fill can be used to make Photoshop Rorschach tests!
[img]http://www.picturesof.info/pictures/bavarian-horse.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i44.tinypic.com/10icxex.jpg[/img]
i also like the mixer brush tool
[url]http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=927457[/url]
Yeah CS5 is awesome.
[QUOTE=bassie12;21692457][URL]http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=927457[/URL]
Yeah CS5 is awesome.[/QUOTE]
Thread of the year.
It can do some wonderful stuff, but also fuck up a lot. What I've seen is impresive, but they should add a way to put a part of the picture into content aware that it couldn't use to replace content with. Like with him and his ex girlfriend, the program should not be able to use him.
Hey that's my avatar! :v:
-snip-
...and here I am still using Photoshop 7.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
