Anyone else find it funny that [sp]The Raptor handling guys lost control/couldn't properly handle a fucking pig?[/sp]
I found the way that the flying dinos were released from their cage to be incredibly contrived.
[QUOTE=NeoDement;47981761]I really liked it but the complete lack of blood was soo unsatisfying :([/QUOTE]
But there was blood used in scenes.
lmao how the fuck are some people saying this is the worst movie they've ever seen?? Have you seen some of the movies lately??? This is actually has some kind of heart and good tension and all around good fun of a movie. I think people these days need to actually see some shit movies instead of just selectively watching good movies to appreciate that not so awful ones.
This movie was pretty [sp]dumb.[/sp]
[sp]Like seriously, nothing made any sense.
-What was with the scene where the younger brother starts bawling about their parents divorcing. And why was it never mentioned again.
-Why were the kids not completely traumatized after almost getting eaten by the Indominus the first time.
-Why, when the Indominus was presumed escaped, was the first reaction to OPEN THE PADDOCK DOOR and go inside, and only look up it's tracking device AFTER the door was open?
-Why does a massive island wide animal park only have one helicopter, and one viable helicopter pilot.
-Why does their containment breach procedure seem woefully ineffective (a few guys on foot, with no vehicular support, non lethal tasers that don't look like they could even take down a T-Rex, and a net gun that fires a net big enough to only fit around the Indominus' mouth.)
-Why was the Indominus hunting for sport? Why would a creature held in captivity all it's life decide to hunt for sport?
-Why would the corporation not want to say that the Indominus had raptor in it... like seriously why was that a secret?
-Why did the raptors side with the Indominus, then only a few scenes later switch back to Chris Pratt's side, even when the Indominus was right there?
-Why did anyone think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea.
-Why did the military guy still think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea when releasing the raptors wound up being a terrible idea.
-Why was it, when trying to throw more dinosaurs at the Indominus (the raptors) turned out to be an awful idea, that the final solution was to throw EVEN MORE dinosaurs at the Indominus (the T-Rex)
-Why did the movie seem weirdly self aware with all it's commentary on how audiences just want bigger and louder stuff, and everything has to be whored out to corporations, yet is completely guilty of the shit it's criticizing. It's another massive budget hollywood sequel that's just focusing on being bigger, louder, and even more dinosaur-y than anything before, as well as having incredibly whorish product placement (every car a mercedes, every phone a samsung, every drink a coca-cola)[/sp]
I mean, it was entertaining, I wasn't bored by it, but I just couldn't ignore the cartoonish characterization, the rediculous godzilla-style dinosaur fights, and just how incredibly dumb the whole movie was.
[QUOTE=NeoDement;47981761]I really liked it but the complete lack of blood was soo unsatisfying :([/QUOTE]
There was a satisfying amount of blood in the one I saw yesterday?
[QUOTE=Rammaster;47987717]I think people these days need to actually see some shit movies instead of just selectively watching good movies to appreciate that not so awful ones.[/QUOTE]
I'm not gonna say JW was the worst movie I've ever seen, hell I'm not even gonna say that I necessarily had a bad time watching it, but why is it a bad thing to hold movies to a higher standard than "generic Hollywood blockbuster reboot"
I don't want to go watch a shitty movie just to make Avengers 2 look good by comparison. I'd rather summer blockbusters actually be well made, creative, and intelligent movies that don't have to bank on nostalgia and brand recognition to make money. Hell that's what the first Jurassic Park did.
[QUOTE=The Vman;47988017]This movie was pretty [sp]dumb.[/sp][/QUOTE]
Can't answer all of them, but here ya go:
[QUOTE=The Vman;47988017]
[sp]1 Why does their containment breach procedure seem woefully ineffective (a few guys on foot, with no vehicular support, non lethal tasers that don't look like they could even take down a T-Rex, and a net gun that fires a net big enough to only fit around the Indominus' mouth.)
2 Why was the Indominus hunting for sport? Why would a creature held in captivity all it's life decide to hunt for sport?
3 Why would the corporation not want to say that the Indominus had raptor in it... like seriously why was that a secret?
4 Why did the raptors side with the Indominus, then only a few scenes later switch back to Chris Pratt's side, even when the Indominus was right there?
5 Why did anyone think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea.
6 Why did the military guy still think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea when releasing the raptors wound up being a terrible idea.
7 Why was it, when trying to throw more dinosaurs at the Indominus (the raptors) turned out to be an awful idea, that the final solution was to throw EVEN MORE dinosaurs at the Indominus (the T-Rex)
8 Why did the movie seem weirdly self aware with all it's commentary on how audiences just want bigger and louder stuff, and everything has to be whored out to corporations, yet is completely guilty of the shit it's criticizing. It's another massive budget hollywood sequel that's just focusing on being bigger, louder, and even more dinosaur-y than anything before, as well as having incredibly whorish product placement (every car a mercedes, every phone a samsung, every drink a coca-cola)[/sp]
[/QUOTE]
[sp]1 Because they wanted to capture it alive as it costed them a lot of money to create it in the first place. Owen even comments it as "they are lost" by not having lethal weapons. Also they were unprepared for it being able to camouflage. And I also think it had stronger skin, so she was immune to electricity.
2 The Indominus hunted for sport because the only thing it ever saw was its own sibling (which she killed) and the chunk of meat it gets feeded with. Owen comments that it's not a good idea to let it grow up in capitivity because it knows nothing else.
3 It's not the corporation that didn't want to say it, it was Wu who didn't want to say it. He made a deal with Hoskins and it's a secret to all others. He secretly works for someone else and created much more possible hybrids. For not telling Masrani what's in the genes got Wu fired and he had to leave.
4 First they were forced by the Ingen Military and Hoskins to hunt the Indominus. This is shown by giving them the headgear, which they obviously dislike. Blue has a deeper connection to Owen and when Owen removes the headgear, he (Blue) remembers him as not being the enemy as Owen was in contact with them their whole life.
5 Because animals have been used for a very long time in wars in specific ways. The military always wants to see their next big possibility to lower casualities. This is another self awareness this movie has, because there will always be these kind of people.
6 Because he is dumb and there will always be these kind of people. He still sees potential in this, by having scientists create dinosaurs for their own way, making them behave into a different direction.
7 The raptors weren't enough to beat the Indominus so they had to get a competitor. The T-Rex is a territorial animal and took on the fight after being lured to it.
8 It's not "weirdly self aware", the movie is just aware of this kind of stuff because it's a reflection to our society. It's called irony and was the best way to make it. Some like it, some don't like it. We take everything for granted and always look for the next big thing. Jurassic World plays in an alternative reality where the park exists, so yeah it would be FULL of product placement for literally everything, just like in other parks as well[/sp]
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;47987657]But there was blood used in scenes.[/QUOTE]
very little, the only blood I saw was in that one scene where the raptor kills the guy offscreen (think that's vague enough to not be spoiler tagged)
[QUOTE=NeoDement;47989061]very little, the only blood I saw was in that one scene where the raptor kills the guy offscreen (think that's vague enough to not be spoiler tagged)[/QUOTE]
[sp]There were also the following scenes with blood:
- Where the mexican guy gets shred in the mouth of the Indominus
- The little blood drops on the wrist of the asian ACU soldier
- Where an ACU soldier gets shred to pieces and the blood drops through leaves of a tree
- Blood on the little vehicle of a killed employee, where the kids pick up the helmet.
- The bloody hand of a soldier where Claire is driving the vehicle.[/sp]
I'm talking about blood coming out when an actual injury happens, like that scene [sp]where the Indominus eats that one hard shelled dinosaurs head, would have been way more satisfying if blood leaked out the mouth shortly afterwards[/sp]
I understand what you mean, but they had to get it PG13. If they would have added more blood it could have ended up being PG16 and they'd lose lots of viewers.
Can't recommend this movie to children though, by far too dark and violent.
Btw, [sp] the bodycount for the movie seems to be 25, according to IMDB trivia. Seems really low as I expected it to be 50+. [/sp]
Yeah I understand why they did it but daaaamn it killed some of my enjoyment :(
I never knew how much I needed to see [sp]a Raptor and a T-rex tag-team another Dinosaur[/sp], but my god does my life feel more validated having seen that.
Random thoughts while I watched the film:
1) [I]Jurassic World[/I] has more explosions than the previous three films combined. This is the Michael Bay of the franchise.
2) The gyrosphere/hamster ball -- somewhat impractical as a touring vehicle in real-world environments. Within five minutes of rolling around, the view would be completely obscured by dirt, mud, dead bugs, dino poop, etc.
3) [sp]As the I-Rex kicked the gyrosphere[/sp] -- "Gooaaaalllll!!!"
4) [sp]As Blue and the T-Rex exchange significant glances after defeating the I-Rex[/sp] -- "If they fistbump, I'm leaving the theater immediately."
[QUOTE=LDragon;47989813]Random thoughts while I watched the film:
1) [I]Jurassic World[/I] has more explosions than the previous three films combined. This is the Michael Bay of the franchise.
[/QUOTE]
Literally every movie nowadays has explosions. And it had only like two or three. It was about time for them to use weapons against them.
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;47988716]Can't answer all of them, but here ya go:
[sp]1 Because they wanted to capture it alive as it costed them a lot of money to create it in the first place. Owen even comments it as "they are lost" by not having lethal weapons. Also they were unprepared for it being able to camouflage. And I also think it had stronger skin, so she was immune to electricity.
2 The Indominus hunted for sport because the only thing it ever saw was its own sibling (which she killed) and the chunk of meat it gets feeded with. Owen comments that it's not a good idea to let it grow up in capitivity because it knows nothing else.
3 It's not the corporation that didn't want to say it, it was Wu who didn't want to say it. He made a deal with Hoskins and it's a secret to all others. He secretly works for someone else and created much more possible hybrids. For not telling Masrani what's in the genes got Wu fired and he had to leave.
4 First they were forced by the Ingen Military and Hoskins to hunt the Indominus. This is shown by giving them the headgear, which they obviously dislike. Blue has a deeper connection to Owen and when Owen removes the headgear, he (Blue) remembers him as not being the enemy as Owen was in contact with them their whole life.
5 Because animals have been used for a very long time in wars in specific ways. The military always wants to see their next big possibility to lower casualities. This is another self awareness this movie has, because there will always be these kind of people.
6 Because he is dumb and there will always be these kind of people. He still sees potential in this, by having scientists create dinosaurs for their own way, making them behave into a different direction.
7 The raptors weren't enough to beat the Indominus so they had to get a competitor. The T-Rex is a territorial animal and took on the fight after being lured to it.
8 It's not "weirdly self aware", the movie is just aware of this kind of stuff because it's a reflection to our society. It's called irony and was the best way to make it. Some like it, some don't like it. We take everything for granted and always look for the next big thing. Jurassic World plays in an alternative reality where the park exists, so yeah it would be FULL of product placement for literally everything, just like in other parks as well[/sp][/QUOTE]
[sp]But all of those answers are still dumb.
1.That doesn't explain why they'd send so few people, and not have bigger nets that can capture things like T-Rex's or other large dinosaurs.
2.But that doesn't make any sense. How does growing up in captivity equate to "kill everything you see"?
3.Again, whyyyy? They already knew the Indominus was genetically modified, and Wu seemed pretty alright saying it had cuttlefish and treefrog in it. If he hadn't kept it a secret then they would have been better prepared to recapture it and his evil plan would be right back on track.
4.So the raptors knew they were being used? What is this a disney movie? It's not even like the raptors were being abused by the military guy, they just kinda got let loose. Owen even mentioned that they'd played "hide and seek" before. When the raptors met the Indominus, they made it their new alpha since it seemed like the strongest leader they could have. It made no sense for them to switch back to Owen's side after they'd already dismissed them as their leader.
5.It's still the dumbest sounding idea ever.
6.The problem was that his reactions were borderline cartoonish. He wasn't giving it a second thought or realizing the potential danger. He didn't seem like a real person because of how incredibly dumb he was.
7.It just seems like it would only cause even more problems. What was to say that after he fought the Indominus, he wouldn't start going after the main characters as well? Instead he also acted like a cartoon character and gave the raptor a knowing nod (ughh) before walking off.
8.The problem is that if you're trying to be ironic by being guilty of what you're criticizing, it just seems like you're either being dishonest, or just really stupid. I'm alright with comments like "Verizon Wireless presents the Indominus Rex" because it's clearly meant to be in the world of the movie, and the characters react to it. It doesn't feel like it's trying to sell me something. But when every cut to a vehicle starts by focusing on the Mercedes logo, I stop feeling like I'm watching a movie and start feeling like I'm watching a car commercial. [/sp]
[QUOTE=Antimuffin;47990084]Literally every movie nowadays has explosions. And it had only like two or three.[/QUOTE]
Oh, I wasn't really complaining about the explosions. I simply had the sudden realisation that, as a Hollywood franchise, [i]Jurassic Park[/i] has been practically kaboom-free up to now.
Ok, this is what i always have been struggling,
[sp]These so called guards and the ACU troopers, why were they so in less? There was just one ACU team after this indominus rex, why not with more? Man, if something really really bad things are happening let's say if i owned the whole island/park i would call reinforcements from the military.[/sp]
Like in this one,
[thumb]http://www.jplegacy.org/jurassicpark3/jp3cut/familylg.jpg[/thumb]
[QUOTE=snijboer;47991854]
[sp]These so called guards and the ACU troopers, why were they so in less? There was just one ACU team after this indominus rex, why not with more? Man, if something really really bad things are happening let's say if i owned the whole island/park i would call reinforcements from the military.[/sp][/QUOTE]
[sp]I'd wager calling in the military would fuck up Hoskins and Wu's plans. Jurassic World was a disaster, but it needed to be a contained disaster.[/sp]
[QUOTE=LDragon;47989813]
2) The gyrosphere/hamster ball -- somewhat impractical as a touring vehicle in real-world environments. Within five minutes of rolling around, the view would be completely obscured by dirt, mud, dead bugs, dino poop, etc.[/QUOTE]
what's really dumb about those is why the fuck wasn't there any failsafes for allowing the staff to remote control them? Why would they let people have a big rolling ball that they fully control then send them off towards herds of dinosaurs? There's like, nothing to even stop them from just ramming into all the dinos and pissing them off lol. They even had GPS trackers on them but NOPE a way to call them back is just out of the question.
the movie was fun as fuck but good god was it dumb lmao. There's so much you could pick apart if you really wanted but I don't care that much
[QUOTE=The Vman;47991025][sp]But all of those answers are still dumb.
1.That doesn't explain why they'd send so few people, and not have bigger nets that can capture things like T-Rex's or other large dinosaurs.
2.But that doesn't make any sense. How does growing up in captivity equate to "kill everything you see"?
3.Again, whyyyy? They already knew the Indominus was genetically modified, and Wu seemed pretty alright saying it had cuttlefish and treefrog in it. If he hadn't kept it a secret then they would have been better prepared to recapture it and his evil plan would be right back on track.
4.So the raptors knew they were being used? What is this a disney movie? It's not even like the raptors were being abused by the military guy, they just kinda got let loose. Owen even mentioned that they'd played "hide and seek" before. When the raptors met the Indominus, they made it their new alpha since it seemed like the strongest leader they could have. It made no sense for them to switch back to Owen's side after they'd already dismissed them as their leader.
5.It's still the dumbest sounding idea ever.
6.The problem was that his reactions were borderline cartoonish. He wasn't giving it a second thought or realizing the potential danger. He didn't seem like a real person because of how incredibly dumb he was.
7.It just seems like it would only cause even more problems. What was to say that after he fought the Indominus, he wouldn't start going after the main characters as well? Instead he also acted like a cartoon character and gave the raptor a knowing nod (ughh) before walking off.
8.The problem is that if you're trying to be ironic by being guilty of what you're criticizing, it just seems like you're either being dishonest, or just really stupid. I'm alright with comments like "Verizon Wireless presents the Indominus Rex" because it's clearly meant to be in the world of the movie, and the characters react to it. It doesn't feel like it's trying to sell me something. But when every cut to a vehicle starts by focusing on the Mercedes logo, I stop feeling like I'm watching a movie and start feeling like I'm watching a car commercial. [/sp][/QUOTE]
Some further explanations:
[sp]1. The net is there to to use it on the mouth, they didn't know that it had hands to remove it. There are some things that they just didn't get informed about. Why? Because the Indominus was a secret to most people anyway. Even Masrani only saw it briefly. He gave the Indominus in order to create but until up to that point in the movie he never saw it himself. In Lost World it only took a guy with an anesthesia rifle to bring down a Rex. They just didn't know that it had this kind of strong skin.
2. It makes sense. It only ever killed its sibling and I guess the Indominus enjoyed it. Furthermore it only gets feeded with flesh. Like I said it knows nothing else, I'm pretty sure she started to enjoy it after the killing.
3. Because he made a secret deal about it. He didn't want to tell them as he was working for someone else. That's why he gets fired and takes all the embryos with him. He was prepared for this to happen.
4. No this not a disney movie. They are still animals. Elephants for example have excellent memories. The raptors also remember stuff. They switched to the Indominus because the Indominus kinda persuaded them to fight on his side because it was part raptor. Later when Owen was about to get killed by it, Blue remembers him for not being one of the bad guys. Of course they are not BFF because of that, but Owen talked about that "respect" thing earlier in the movie. He was there with them their whole life. When the raptors met the Indominus they had never seen another raptor in their life so they kinda took it as their leader. But later they recognized Owen back as their leader as he was about to get killed by the Indominus.
5. The dinosaurs were the next big thing, it just makes sense to have the military involved in it, even if it's cliched. In real life it would be the same.
6. Well I guess it was just bad characterization with him. And of course he didn't know the danger of it, because he hasn't experienced it himself until the end of the movie when one of the raptors kills him. Some people are just too stubborn about certain things. He also made that deal with Wu so he kinda forced himself to push this idea.
7. Because both were pretty much exhausted (because animals can get tired too) from the fight. After the battle they just recognized each other because they fought together against the Indominus. The T-Rex was also almost half dead as it had wounds everywhere and was already really old. They just didn't want another fight, because, compared to the Indominus, they weren't pure killing machines but just animals who were tired from a long and exhausting fight.
8. I guess Universal just made a deal with them to do it this way. Didn't like it myself as well, but I also don't mind lots of things in movies.[/sp]
[QUOTE=postal;47992742]Why would they let people have a big rolling ball that they fully control then send them off towards herds of dinosaurs? There's like, nothing to even stop them from just ramming into all the dinos and pissing them off lol.[/QUOTE]
According to the wiki site, the gyrospheres [I]do[/I] have an auto-avoidance feature to prevent intentional collisions with the animals.
[QUOTE=The Vman;47988017]This movie was pretty [sp]dumb.[/sp]
[sp]Like seriously, nothing made any sense.
-What was with the scene where the younger brother starts bawling about their parents divorcing. And why was it never mentioned again.
-Why were the kids not completely traumatized after almost getting eaten by the Indominus the first time.
-Why, when the Indominus was presumed escaped, was the first reaction to OPEN THE PADDOCK DOOR and go inside, and only look up it's tracking device AFTER the door was open?
-Why does a massive island wide animal park only have one helicopter, and one viable helicopter pilot.
-Why does their containment breach procedure seem woefully ineffective (a few guys on foot, with no vehicular support, non lethal tasers that don't look like they could even take down a T-Rex, and a net gun that fires a net big enough to only fit around the Indominus' mouth.)
-Why was the Indominus hunting for sport? Why would a creature held in captivity all it's life decide to hunt for sport?
-Why would the corporation not want to say that the Indominus had raptor in it... like seriously why was that a secret?
-Why did the raptors side with the Indominus, then only a few scenes later switch back to Chris Pratt's side, even when the Indominus was right there?
-Why did anyone think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea.
-Why did the military guy still think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea when releasing the raptors wound up being a terrible idea.
-Why was it, when trying to throw more dinosaurs at the Indominus (the raptors) turned out to be an awful idea, that the final solution was to throw EVEN MORE dinosaurs at the Indominus (the T-Rex)
-Why did the movie seem weirdly self aware with all it's commentary on how audiences just want bigger and louder stuff, and everything has to be whored out to corporations, yet is completely guilty of the shit it's criticizing. It's another massive budget hollywood sequel that's just focusing on being bigger, louder, and even more dinosaur-y than anything before, as well as having incredibly whorish product placement (every car a mercedes, every phone a samsung, every drink a coca-cola)[/sp]
I mean, it was entertaining, I wasn't bored by it, but I just couldn't ignore the cartoonish characterization, the rediculous godzilla-style dinosaur fights, and just how incredibly dumb the whole movie was.[/QUOTE]
[sp]-I find it silly that anyone would invest so much money in a dinossaur park after what happened in the previous 3 movies, let alone invest in it with such a dumb security system. Hell, even some zoos have better security than this.[/sp]
[QUOTE=The Vman;47988017]This movie was pretty [sp]dumb.[/sp]
[sp]Like seriously, nothing made any sense.
-What was with the scene where the younger brother starts bawling about their parents divorcing. And why was it never mentioned again.
-Why were the kids not completely traumatized after almost getting eaten by the Indominus the first time.
-Why, when the Indominus was presumed escaped, was the first reaction to OPEN THE PADDOCK DOOR and go inside, and only look up it's tracking device AFTER the door was open?
-Why does a massive island wide animal park only have one helicopter, and one viable helicopter pilot.
-Why does their containment breach procedure seem woefully ineffective (a few guys on foot, with no vehicular support, non lethal tasers that don't look like they could even take down a T-Rex, and a net gun that fires a net big enough to only fit around the Indominus' mouth.)
-Why was the Indominus hunting for sport? Why would a creature held in captivity all it's life decide to hunt for sport?
-Why would the corporation not want to say that the Indominus had raptor in it... like seriously why was that a secret?
-Why did the raptors side with the Indominus, then only a few scenes later switch back to Chris Pratt's side, even when the Indominus was right there?
-Why did anyone think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea.
-Why did the military guy still think weaponizing dinosaurs was a good idea when releasing the raptors wound up being a terrible idea.
-Why was it, when trying to throw more dinosaurs at the Indominus (the raptors) turned out to be an awful idea, that the final solution was to throw EVEN MORE dinosaurs at the Indominus (the T-Rex)
-Why did the movie seem weirdly self aware with all it's commentary on how audiences just want bigger and louder stuff, and everything has to be whored out to corporations, yet is completely guilty of the shit it's criticizing. It's another massive budget hollywood sequel that's just focusing on being bigger, louder, and even more dinosaur-y than anything before, as well as having incredibly whorish product placement (every car a mercedes, every phone a samsung, every drink a coca-cola)[/sp]
I mean, it was entertaining, I wasn't bored by it, but I just couldn't ignore the cartoonish characterization, the rediculous godzilla-style dinosaur fights, and just how incredibly dumb the whole movie was.[/QUOTE]
people don't want to think about what they watch anymore
they want "fun popcorn movies" without being able to explain their "just fun".
because that would mean admitting to getting braindead by choice
I mean, do you think they chose to make the plot make no fucking sense? They basically said 'well this and this and this needs to happen in the movie because dinosaurs' and came up with some stuff that would make sense to allow those things to happen
Don't get all elitist, there's nothing wrong with occasionally shutting your brain off and watching some people get chased around by dinosaurs, as long as you're able to acknowledge that it's not a masterpiece
And frankly I watched the whole movie, and just enjoyed the ride. I wasn't sitting there picking apart all of the plot details that, I agree make no sense, because I wanted to enjoy the movie.
I enjoyed the movie for what it was. A fun ride with many flaws and I didn't regret it. I'm also going to see it again this weekend.
[QUOTE=Biscuit-Boy;48003889]I mean, do you think they chose to make the plot make no fucking sense? They basically said 'well this and this and this needs to happen in the movie because dinosaurs' and came up with some stuff that would make sense to allow those things to happen
Don't get all elitist, there's nothing wrong with occasionally shutting your brain off and watching some people get chased around by dinosaurs, as long as you're able to acknowledge that it's not a masterpiece
And frankly I watched the whole movie, and just enjoyed the ride. I wasn't sitting there picking apart all of the plot details that, I agree make no sense, because I wanted to enjoy the movie.[/QUOTE]
they chose to not care about details because the audience doesn't
also where is the elitist coming from, I'm pointing out facts.
and of course there is a lot wrong with shutting off you brain because in entertainment industry that's what's happening all the time. that wouldn't be a problem in itself but the thing is that people consume entertainment more than ever so the "shutting off" is far from occasionally
and also don't you think that there is something wrong when you feel the need to shut off your brain to enjoy something?
[QUOTE=Killuah;48003974]
and also don't you think that there is something wrong when you feel the need to shut off your brain to enjoy something?[/QUOTE]
Sometimes you just want to turn off your brain and have fun entertainment. When I come home from my workplace, I'm tired as hell and just exactly want that. I don't have the energy, nor do I want, to think even more after the tiresome, hourlong work that I do 5 times a week. There is really nothing wrong with that.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
Jurassic World (2015)
