[QUOTE=Sparkwire;37699119]I'm going to make this.[/QUOTE]
Oh cool! I don't know how I can help you more though, because I'm [del]an useless and talentless sack of lard[/del] just a Steam Translator. But now I'm curious to see how the model would look like, sounds complicated to me.
[QUOTE=COSTA;37699313]Oh cool! I don't know how I can help you more though, because I'm [del]an useless and talentless sack of lard[/del] just a Steam Translator. But now I'm curious to see how the model would look like, sounds complicated to me.[/QUOTE]
Since the Scout lacks a head bodygroup, Spark will likely have it completely envelop his head and have the jigglebones, if any, work in such a way that they do not sway far enough to expose any of the Scout's head that's hidden beneath. Since it's a fish, he might attempt to make faceposing or lip syncing or just have the head flop around with jigglebones and that's it. The melee is simple enough as-is, a Scout head wrapped in newspaper.
[QUOTE=Bazkip;37694770]Make him judge you in a third
[img]http://www.mariowiki.com/images/1/1e/Bootler.PNG[/img][/QUOTE]
*AHEM*
[img]http://pressthebuttons.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/mother3ghosts.png[/img]
[img]http://puu.sh/1601A[/img]
[img]http://puu.sh/1601N[/img]
We need a Wine Glass ghost~
[QUOTE=Psychopath12;37699382]Since the Scout lacks a head bodygroup, Spark will likely have it completely envelop his head and have the jigglebones, if any, work in such a way that they do not sway far enough to expose any of the Scout's head that's hidden beneath. Since it's a fish, he might attempt to make faceposing or lip syncing or just have the head flop around with jigglebones and that's it. The melee is simple enough as-is, a Scout head wrapped in newspaper.[/QUOTE]
I figured it would be something like that, yes. Another thing would, wouldn't the models need to be somewhat similar to the original milkman set to be more effective? Since that set was contributor-made, wouldn't Sparkwire need permission from the original author to create a "parody set"? Or once an item gets in-game, it becomes Valve's property and other authors can make a different project based on such items?
Jesus, that was a complicated paragraph to write.
[QUOTE=COSTA;37699418]I figured it would be something like that, yes. Another thing would, wouldn't the models need to be somewhat similar to the original milkman set to be more effective? Since that set was contributor-made, wouldn't Sparkwire need permission from the original author to create a "parody set"? Or once an item gets in-game, it becomes Valve's property and other authors can make a different project based on such items?
Jesus, that was a complicated paragraph to write.[/QUOTE]
Spark never said that he'd be contributing it. It's a bit too silly of an item to be in-game, especially considering that it completely envelops the head, which is kind of important for snipers to aim at.
[IMG]http://puu.sh/160dQ[/IMG]
say hello to [del]mulder and skully[/del] murder and 2spooky
[QUOTE=Psychopath12;37699432]Spark never said that he'd be contributing it. It's a bit too silly of an item to be in-game, especially considering that it completely envelops the head, which is kind of important for snipers to aim at.[/QUOTE]
Disregard this particular case, how do these things usually work? For example, imagine someone would want to make a teddy bear that is wearing, say, the Madame Dixie. Can a person submit that, or is it required to ask permission to the original author (in this case the Madame Dixie's creator)?
I'd like to know if when an item gets in-game, it becomes automatically Valve's property and any other contributor will then be able to create an item with the likeliness of said product, without the need of any other permissions or requirements.
(And about the head being too big and presenting a problem to Snipers, I figured it shouldn't be a problem since it would probably be a Halloween-only item, and the Idiot Box seems to be way bigger than that)
[QUOTE=COSTA;37699538]Disregard this particular case, how do these things usually work? For example, imagine someone would want to make a teddy bear that is wearing, say, the Madame Dixie. Can a person submit that, or is it required to ask permission to the original author (in this case the Madame Dixie's creator).
I'm curious if when an item gets in-game, it becomes automatically Valve's property and any other contributor will then be able to create an item with the likeliness of said product, without the need of any other permissions or requirements.[/quote]
It's Valve's property. But things that pay homage to it are free-game. Direct alterations of it are foul-territory, Valve will shoot those down despite them technically being Valve property.
[QUOTE=COSTA;37699538](And about the head being too big and presenting a problem to Snipers, I figured it shouldn't be a problem since it would probably be a Halloween-only item, and the Idiot Box seems to be way bigger than that)[/QUOTE]
Idiot box may conceal the head, but it does not add triple the height of his head onto his shoulders. His head still stops where the hat stops approximately, the fish head is huge.
actually iirc you still get full rights over your model
Psycopath, you're a damn good encyclopedia.
Good luck to Spark though, modelling a fish from scratch is no easy task.
[QUOTE=Venezuelan;37699670]actually iirc you still get full rights over your model[/QUOTE]
Oh right, forgot to mention. Contributors still have a degree of control over their own contributions; but that doesn't mean they have complete control in all cases -- take the Last Breath fixes that Daimao contributed for example and compare to the reworked #1 Fan set that BANG! contributed. Valve can take liberties with the items if they choose to do so, but will attempt to be accommodating to contributor-made alterations to a certain extent.
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=COSTA;37699685]Psycopath, you're a damn good encyclopedia.
Good luck to Spark though, modelling a fish from scratch is no easy task.[/QUOTE]
It's Sparkwire, I don't expect it to take him even until dinnertime for him to have the model down-pat :v:
what I mean is, I think if say you wanted to put your item in another game you could
Started on a head for the Bigfoot set, I'm not really liking it tho, could use some CC.
[IMG]http://nukeaduke.com/img/bigFeet15.jpg[/IMG]
-snip-
[QUOTE=Venezuelan;37699861]what I mean is, I think if say you wanted to put your item in another game you could[/QUOTE]
Yep, according to the ToS that's fine as long as
1. You let Valve do the same (so the Mackerel in that one F2P game)
2. It's not exclusive to that game (so you can't go and sue Valve later saying it's only for your game).
Neither can have exclusive rights to the model. It's actually a really fair and contributor friendly ToS
[QUOTE=The Lone Spy;37696021]Something tells me many people will say: "IT'S THE ANGER MODEL BUT FOR THE HEAVY" or something like that.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://i49.tinypic.com/1qoc28.png[/img]
clearly
clearly
[QUOTE=ArakanI;37699911]Started on a head for the Bigfoot set, I'm not really liking it tho, could use some CC.
[IMG]http://nukeaduke.com/img/bigFeet15.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
maybe you should make it more simple a have a mane and pointy teeth
[t]http://puu.sh/161c7[/t]
clearly
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
you fuck
sorry
clearly
obviously
sorry
you are forgiven
[QUOTE=ned_ballad;37700137]clearly[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=thecuntsman;37700157]clearly[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sparkwire;37700165]clearly
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
you fuck[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=pogothemunty;37700189]clearly[/QUOTE]
Holy jesus, we get it, we love crystals and diamonds! :v:
most definitely
clearly
Obviously
sorry
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
