Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Chat thread: new thread on LAN? i arent think that - Games

[QUOTE=HumbleTH;51644562]CT side Mirage. 3 people go A, 1 mid, leave me alone on B site, with an AWP. I was sitting in short watching chair, but moved to pillar after I heard steps in apts. While I'm watching for the enemy team to peek through apts, my teammate in window gets shot from ladder room. I get blamed for it, because I'm supposed to be watching both short and b alone with an awp as I hear them running out apts. Few rounds later, the same guy is trying to convince the team to kick me. [I]We literally die because of him. The enemies don't kill us, he kills us.[/I] Keep in mind, most rounds the 3 people A lost the site and put me in a retake. It's never their fault though, I just didn't noclip to the other site to help them in time.[/QUOTE] Probably going to get a few disagrees on this but if you are playing B site alone (3-1-1), it's not wise for you to be holding it from short imo especially since you have an awp. Also gives lesser chance for shitheads like him to push the blame on to you.

[QUOTE=Swamplord;51645679]Probably going to get a few disagrees on this but if you are playing B site alone (3-1-1), it's not wise for you to be holding it from short imo especially since you have an awp. Also gives lesser chance for shitheads like him to push the blame on to you.[/QUOTE] Yeah, true, I probably should've held from market, but I only realised after I went short that the person who usually played B with me was on A.

SMFC, 8/9 wins in recent matches, only two matches where I wasn't top 2 (One 3rd, one 5th in a comfortable win so about 14/7). The global has got to be close :D

[QUOTE=FFStudios;51645499]ESEA doesn't provide a single service that another company doesn't already do better. What a waste of time to play ESEA.[/QUOTE] Not sure what services you're talking about, but ive never had as good 3rd party csgo services as esea Playing faceit servers, i have always had issues with some kind of stuttering from their servers and weird ass flicker of players. Cevo's scrimming and 10man system is fine, but their pug is awful. always doing .need and when people dont like the map voted we're sitting another 10minutes for .need to join

[QUOTE=Reyjr43;51644811]I highly doubt that happened, you would have to be a high priority target for them to do that, and by that I mean really piss someone at Valve off, I think the only person I know of that has actually been manually VAC banned is Altimor because he kept crashing a Valve employee's server.[/QUOTE] Nah, someone I gave it to did the server crashing and they got their account disabled, not VAC banned.

[url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qLq1dZOIUCPhf73vPeRAIbIEDdZ2Ohbm0wgBo8jad9M/edit#gid=1888357222"]So here is my group's 2016 Matchmaking stats.[/url] I sadly did not do that well, with 17 deaths more than kills :/.

It's interesting that your win % is highest when solo and not only doesn't improve but actually seems to get worse as you add people. Do you mess about more as you add people?

[QUOTE=NeonpieDFTBA;51648302]It's interesting that your win % is highest when solo and not only doesn't improve but actually seems to get worse as you add people. Do you mess about more as you add people?[/QUOTE] Not really, we try to win 99% of times. I guess it depends on the teammates that we get and the rank difference when playing as a stack maybe. Edit: Also if you are playing with a stack then you are more likely going to be on the Terrorist side. [img]http://i.imgur.com/eFla99N.png[/img]

[QUOTE=Drag#!;51648356]Not really, we try to win 99% of times. I guess it depends on the teammates that we get and the rank difference when playing as a stack maybe. Edit: Also if you are playing with a stack then you are more likely going to be on the Terrorist side. [img]http://i.imgur.com/eFla99N.png[/img][/QUOTE] Me and my friends always get CT side. We used to joke around and go "bet ct/t all" during load screen where a correct guess would net you a deagle and an incorrect guess would see you part ways with a deagle. We don't do this game anymore because the RNG on mm is broken, my friends took stats and literally 15/20 games would land us on ct side.

[QUOTE=kaskade700;51648797]Me and my friends always get CT side. We used to joke around and go "bet ct/t all" during load screen where a correct guess would net you a deagle and an incorrect guess would see you part ways with a deagle. We don't do this game anymore because the RNG on mm is broken, my friends took stats and literally 15/20 games would land us on ct side.[/QUOTE] That's because it isn't RNG and is actually about the order you connect in.

Back to Nova 1 again for the 4th time... I swear I have extremely bad luck being in Nova 2. How much different can playing in Nova 1 vs Nova 2 be? I can win most of my Nova 1 games. Why do I keep deranking back and forth. I never won a match during my time in Nova 2, but a miracle or something, I actually won one match and it turns out to be the best match I have for a long time. [IMG]http://imgur.com/8HJToEA.png[/IMG] Time to grind again..

[QUOTE=Chubbs;51648866]That's because it isn't RNG and is actually about the order you connect in.[/QUOTE] Well my point is that what is supposed to be randomly generated is obviously not and is instead based on something tangible like connection order or something else entirely.

Went against a German Twitch streamer last night, only about 60-70 viewers though. Found the VOD: [url]https://www.twitch.tv/strikercg/v/113628619?t=20m38s[/url] Was kind of entertaining for me to watch back from his perspective even though I can't speak German. Especially when he reported me and the top fragger on my team for aim / wall hacks after we 16:3'd them ;-) To be fair it was an unfair matchup in terms of ranks.

[QUOTE=Ziks;51648989]Went against a German Twitch streamer last night, only about 60-70 viewers though. Found the VOD: [url]https://www.twitch.tv/strikercg/v/113628619?t=20m38s[/url] Was kind of entertaining for me to watch back from his perspective even though I can't speak German. Especially when he reported me and the top fragger on my team for aim / wall hacks after we 16:3'd them ;-) To be fair it was an unfair matchup in terms of ranks.[/QUOTE] Had the same thing once, a Swedish streamer was talking shit when being up 5-0 but lost hard in the end. It feels great listening to someone being super confident just to become extremely frustrated by the end.

[QUOTE=roxter;51649494]Had the same thing once, a Swedish streamer was talking shit when being up 5-0 but lost hard in the end. It feels great listening to someone being super confident just to become extremely frustrated by the end.[/QUOTE] Every time a comeback happens one person on the enemy team: Shit teammates, no comms report orange for greif nice toggle enjoy vac no exceptions

When i played as a 5 stack back in 2015 we managed to get the opposing 5 stack of salty germans so upset they started linking our steam profiles in /r/gay after they came up short with evidence of non-existing hacking.

I'm now on 10/11, just went 34/16, STILL FUCKING SMFC this is never coming. Edit, 11/12, currently WWWWWWLWWWWW isn't enough :suicide:* *add another W to the not global train

Been playing the counter strike classic offensive mod, and I'm not sure if it's just nostalgia or if I actually enjoy it more than CSGO. Right now it feels more like counterstrike more than CSGO ever did.

[QUOTE=NeonpieDFTBA;51650511]I'm now on 10/11, just went 34/16, STILL FUCKING SMFC this is never coming. Edit, 11/12, currently WWWWWWLWWWWW isn't enough :suicide:* *add another W to the not global train[/QUOTE] im on a ~60% winrate for two months now and still not supreme.

[QUOTE=Asaratha;51653563]no wonder you were worried about getting overwatched by "Bad players" in my old thread :^)[/QUOTE] for reference [t]http://i.imgur.com/fqVtRvR.png[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/dbGjjkw.png[/t]

I wonder if Plaster knows about the few test cases that Overwatch puts out for you first to determine if your vote is worthy of actual consideration in real cases. Or that your vote gets completely nulled after a set of bad decisions.

[QUOTE=Asaratha;51653563]no wonder you were worried about getting overwatched by "Bad players" in my old thread :^)[/QUOTE] Fuck my accounts, who even gives a shit about their alts? My point was more that "uninformed" players are reporting everyone on the team which makes overwatch get more useless than it already is. [editline]11th January 2017[/editline] [QUOTE=Dawnkiller;51653806]I wonder if Plaster knows about the few test cases that Overwatch puts out for you first to determine if your vote is worthy of actual consideration in real cases. Or that your vote gets completely nulled after a set of bad decisions.[/QUOTE] Now I'm curious. Was that actually confirmed or did someone post on reddit and get 200 upvotes for that which makes it credible?

[QUOTE=Plaster;51653838]Fuck my accounts, who even gives a shit about their alts? My point was more that "uninformed" players are reporting everyone on the team which makes overwatch get more useless than it already is. [editline]11th January 2017[/editline] Now I'm curious. Was that actually confirmed or did someone post on reddit and get 200 upvotes for that which makes it credible?[/QUOTE] valve directly explained that it sends you test cases that change your vote weight, and that if you agree with the majority of voters your score goes up [url]http://blog.counter-strike.net/index.php/overwatch/[/url] for someone who complains about people being uninformed, you are pretty uninformed yourself

[QUOTE=ThinMemer;51653930]valve directly explained that it sends you test cases that change your vote weight, and that if you agree with the majority of voters your score goes up [url]http://blog.counter-strike.net/index.php/overwatch/[/url] for someone who complains about people being uninformed, you are pretty uninformed yourself[/QUOTE] Somehow I thought you meant that valve actively sends out matches where they know the suspected player is a hacker to see if they over watcher actually watch the match and don't randomly tick a random box.

[QUOTE=Plaster;51653948]Somehow I thought you meant that valve actively sends out matches where they know the suspected player is a hacker to see if they over watcher actually watch the match and don't randomly tick a random box.[/QUOTE] Considering thats literally what they do (although its automated) im not sure what this post is trying to convey are you just trying to say that you are right despite not actually saying anything? if someone doesnt align with the conviction that was already given in that demo (ie the person is already banned, so its most likely obvious) then their weight is lowered

No, I've understood from your Post that they don't send those matches out but they do rate an OW by how they vote and if they did what the majority did then they'd get an higher score. Sooorryyyy if my English is shit and I don't understand something correctly or say correctly what I actually mean

[QUOTE=Plaster;51653993]No, I've understood from your Post that they don't send those matches out but they do rate an OW by how they vote and if they did what the majority did then they'd get an higher score. Sooorryyyy if my English is shit and I don't understand something correctly or say correctly what I actually mean[/QUOTE] they do send previously convicted demos out read the blogpost i linked

It's better than the old method of using 16-tick demos of pros. Everyone looks like a cheater in a 16-tick GOTV demo, especially if they have decent aim.

I thought it was pretty clear that your rank in a video game doesn't define your ability to detect if someone is cheating, and since Overwatch is there to detect really blatant cheaters (people looking at other people through walls, blatantly aimbotting, using "spinbot" in-game, etc) then your rank is even LESS important. You don't have to be SMFC to know that a guy looking at the ground and instantly headshotting the enemy team is cheating.

[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRu0p17sL6g[/media] :excited: