• [EVE Online] Facepunch Corp Now Recruiting !!!
    5,002 replies, posted
[QUOTE=sanitarium.;25855943]There would be reps if people like you and Bulaba didn't dismiss the Chimera as being worthless :v:[/QUOTE] Problem being 3/4 Races can fly armor setups much better than shield, and there are many fewer Wyv's than Aeons and Nyxes. Splitting your RR's between shield and armor also would mean you reduce tank on the ship of the incorrect type. Having All-Armor Fleets with All-Armor reps is simply the easiest and best way to go. [QUOTE=sanitarium.;25851966]Chimera is not worthless. It's fine for POS repping, and the Wyvern is right up there with the Aeon as far as tank goes (you can easily squeeze 30 million EHP out of it) if you want to move up to supercarrier. As you mentioned Caldari BS 5 also opens the way for the Golem, which for me, has been the most useful ship I've trained for thus far.[/QUOTE] "if you want to move up to supercarrier" is a significant step from flying a chimera. Chances are if you can aquire the 30b neccessary to get a Fitted Wyvern, you can buy yourself a better character ready for a Nyx or Aeon. I won't doubt the Golem, though. It's an excellent Marauder. I just try to keep people from going PMS when they find out their Chimeras are basically useless in cap fleets.
Just lent my navyfield account for 3 days to some scrub I know in real life for 110m isk. (v:v:v) Guy has too much money and not enough playtime.
[QUOTE=Bulaba0;25856126]Problem being 3/4 Races can fly armor setups much better than shield, and there are many fewer Wyv's than Aeons and Nyxes. Splitting your RR's between shield and armor also would mean you reduce tank on the ship of the incorrect type. Having All-Armor Fleets with All-Armor reps is simply the easiest and best way to go. "if you want to move up to supercarrier" is a significant step from flying a chimera. Chances are if you can aquire the 30b neccessary to get a Fitted Wyvern, you can buy yourself a better character ready for a Nyx or Aeon. I won't doubt the Golem, though. It's an excellent Marauder. I just try to keep people from going PMS when they find out their Chimeras are basically useless in cap fleets.[/QUOTE] I don't disagree about armor reps being easier to use, but the Chimera does have a place in a fleet, as support for those people using phoenixes and nags. It's not all supercaps, at least not yet, dreads still do get used. Plus, the Chimera is by far the best looking carrier out of them all. I want one for that reason alone.
Yeah, the Amarr carriers look like someone scooped part of them out or they were only half ass build. Gallente ships in general are just ugly. The Minmatar carriers I like though. The Wyvern is just weird.
[QUOTE=Computermaster;25857263]Yeah, the Amarr carriers look like someone scooped part of them out or they were only half ass build. Gallente ships in general are just ugly. The Minmatar carriers I like though. The Wyvern is just weird.[/QUOTE] the nyx is the most beautiful ship in game, but i'll agree that the thanatos is ass
Okay, looking back at its model ingame, the Nyx is pretty badass.
[QUOTE=PsiSoldier;25818743][url=http://imgur.com/IUOpf.png]heh[/url][/QUOTE] It would be pretty funny if CCP devs actually started fighting you guys. But we all know they're too busy chilling in Polaris.
[QUOTE=LF9000;25862347]It would be pretty funny if CCP devs actually started fighting you guys. But we all know they're too busy chilling in Polaris.[/QUOTE] CCP is fighting TEST. Did you not hear that a GM with an alt in IT alliance took down TCUs they set up in 'IT space' (they didn't actually have sov, but still claimed the space, which is why TEST was able to anchor TCUs right away)? No other TCUs were taken down during downtime, only TEST's, until the forum went insane and 5 or 6 hours later they took down all the other TCUs that went up to make it look less like a scandal. They need to ban devs from joining player organizations. It's a pattern with these people, always giving unfair advantages to BoB/IT.
[QUOTE=sanitarium.;25862712]CCP is fighting TEST. Did you not hear that a GM with an alt in IT alliance took down TCUs they set up in 'IT space' (they didn't actually have sov, but still claimed the space, which is why TEST was able to anchor TCUs right away)? No other TCUs were taken down during downtime, only TEST's, until the forum went insane and 5 or 6 hours later they took down all the other TCUs that went up to make it look less like a scandal. They need to ban devs from joining player organizations. It's a pattern with these people, always giving unfair advantages to BoB/IT.[/QUOTE] I think they should be able to play the game and join player corps/alliances. It gives them a better perspective on what is broken and needs to be fixed than if they had to go off of the players alone. That said there should be better accountability within CCP to make sure no cheating occurs.
[QUOTE=sanitarium.;25862712]CCP is fighting TEST. Did you not hear that a GM with an alt in IT alliance took down TCUs they set up in 'IT space' (they didn't actually have sov, but still claimed the space, which is why TEST was able to anchor TCUs right away)? No other TCUs were taken down during downtime, only TEST's, until the forum went insane and 5 or 6 hours later they took down all the other TCUs that went up to make it look less like a scandal. They need to ban devs from joining player organizations. It's a pattern with these people, always giving unfair advantages to BoB/IT.[/QUOTE] Doesn't stop them from having alts. If we just allow devs/ "eve-officials" to join player organizations with heavy surveillance/ scrutiny I think it would give them a better perspective on the current issues in eve
Well, completed my training for tech 2 electronic warfare... Now if only I had people to roll with/a ship to use it with.
[QUOTE=Wolfmatyr;25867101]Well, completed my training for tech 2 electronic warfare... Now if only I had people to roll with/a ship to use it with.[/QUOTE] Training up for a Rook or something? [editline]5th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=sanitarium.;25862712]CCP is fighting TEST. Did you not hear that a GM with an alt in IT alliance took down TCUs they set up in 'IT space' (they didn't actually have sov, but still claimed the space, which is why TEST was able to anchor TCUs right away)? No other TCUs were taken down during downtime, only TEST's, until the forum went insane and 5 or 6 hours later they took down all the other TCUs that went up to make it look less like a scandal. They need to ban devs from joining player organizations. It's a pattern with these people, always giving unfair advantages to BoB/IT.[/QUOTE] I think that's fucking hilarious.
GMs are known to be dumb, one wouldnt reset a mission for me because it disappeared during downtime, then after 5 days a senior gm appeared and fixed it in 10 seconds.
[QUOTE=sanitarium.;25862712] It's a pattern with these people, always giving unfair advantages to BoB/IT.[/QUOTE] < :smug:
You know, all this has happened before, and it will happen again. CCP cheats on BoB's behalf, and despite that, you should still expect the Goons (with the help of TEST) to take Delve away from them again, cheating or no. Then of course BoB will come back with a new name and retake Delve when the Goons get bored and leave the game again.
Any pvp corps willing to take me in? 3.3m SP caldari, I've been doing pve up to now but I want to get into some pvp. Contact me in-game Raven Gale
So, it seems the Pandemic Legion is attacking TNT. :frown:
[QUOTE=Computermaster;25882443]So, it seems the Pandemic Legion is attacking [B]NC[/B] :frown: [/QUOTE] Fixed. <3
Why must you do this? :frown:
[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/EVE021.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Computermaster;25882443]So, it seems the Pandemic Legion is attacking TNT. :frown:[/QUOTE] because sitting around station spinning is no fun
i'm listening to UAxDEATH tell drinking stories in TS and its hilarious as hell.
[url]http://i.imgur.com/dmrjl.png[/url] Edit: awesome, didn't want that automerge anyway.
[QUOTE=scout1;25883091][img_thumb]http://filesmelt.com/dl/EVE021.png[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] On a related note. I scanned down another plex and another radar tonight. Need to wait for alliance mates to get on to run them though. [editline]6th November 2010[/editline] Lurv null-sec scanning.
Bastard.
[QUOTE=scout1;25887326]On a related note. I scanned down another plex and another radar tonight. Need to wait for alliance mates to get on to run them though. [editline]6th November 2010[/editline] Lurv null-sec scanning.[/QUOTE] What kind of plex? Also radar is shit, the only things I run in nullsec are 6/10s, 8/10s, and anoms.
Anybody remember that newbie that came around in the thread asking for a good ship that can "hold more than one drone" and do "player versus pirate"? [img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/Done_with_this.png[/img] Never again do I mentor furries v:v:v
[QUOTE=sanitarium.;25875694]You know, all this has happened before, and it will happen again. CCP cheats on BoB's behalf, and despite that, you should still expect the Goons (with the help of TEST) to take Delve away from them again, cheating or no. Then of course BoB will come back with a new name and retake Delve when the Goons get bored and leave the game again.[/QUOTE] You fucking wish. Both GoonSwarm and TEST are inept motherfuckers.
uhm no
[QUOTE=sanitarium.;25875694]You know, all this has happened before, and it will happen again. CCP cheats on BoB's behalf, and despite that, you should still expect the Goons (with the help of TEST) to take Delve away from them again, cheating or no. Then of course BoB will come back with a new name and retake Delve when the Goons get bored and leave the game again.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Plectophera;25888836]You fucking wish. Both GoonSwarm and TEST are inept motherfuckers.[/QUOTE] Both of you are retarded.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.