• Super Smash Bros. series Thread
    775 replies, posted
Am I the only one who prefers playing melee to brawl because despite all the neat new characters and extra features, brawl's physics and flow are just too damn sluggish and awkward? Not to say that Brawl isn't fun every once in a while either but I hope the next game has Melee physics.
[QUOTE=plokoon9619;34390889]So Facepunch, what is your roster predictions for SSB4?[/QUOTE] the usuals and megaman maybe a donkey kong villain another star fox character another fire emblem character idk
[QUOTE=Itachi_Crow;34398143]Am I the only one who prefers playing melee to brawl because despite all the neat new characters and extra features, brawl's physics and flow are just too damn sluggish and awkward? Not to say that Brawl isn't fun every once in a while either but I hope the next game has Melee physics.[/QUOTE] I feel the same. Brawl seems too floaty for me; however, Homebrew brings a new level of fun to Brawl.
[QUOTE=Itachi_Crow;34398143]Am I the only one who prefers playing melee to brawl because despite all the neat new characters and extra features, brawl's physics and flow are just too damn sluggish and awkward? Not to say that Brawl isn't fun every once in a while either but I hope the next game has Melee physics.[/QUOTE] I felt the same exact way after Brawls release. I still had a blast playing through Brawl and unlocking everything with my friends, but the flow of Melee was just so good and fast paced after you got used to it. If the next game has Melee's speed and flow with more content than Brawl then I'll be fine for a long time.
original SSB master race
I hope they keep Snake.
[QUOTE=Maximo13;34402114]I hope they keep Snake.[/QUOTE] If so, I hope they add Old Snake as a costume for him.
I hope they keep Mewtwo.
[QUOTE=Dominicus;34402741]I hope they keep Mewtwo.[/QUOTE] Lucario was pretty much exactly like Mewtwo, except he isn't as half as cool
Lucario got stronger the more damage he took. [editline]26th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=SmashJonXD;34396270]Where's that image of pokemon if they swapped gen 1 and 5[/QUOTE] Can't find it
[QUOTE=Tuskin;34404993]Lucario got stronger the more damage he took. [/QUOTE] I thought that happened with Mewtwo too [editline]26th January 2012[/editline] and did it make all of his attacks stronger or just his energy ball?
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;34405375]I thought that happened with Mewtwo too [editline]26th January 2012[/editline] and did it make all of his attacks stronger or just his energy ball?[/QUOTE] All the aura-based ones I think.
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;34404006]Lucario was pretty much exactly like Mewtwo, except he isn't as half as cool[/QUOTE] uh he was almost nothing like mewtwo he had one attack that was in common and that was his neutral b everything else was completely changed still woulda preferred a buffed mewtwo, maybe make his reflection attack actually worth something (as it is in melee it will reflect projectiles but not return damage. what the shit was the reasoning behind that??)
If there's at least one new character, make it possible to switch out Pokemon Trainer's generation of Pokemon. Instead of Squirtle, Ivysaur, and Charizard, maybe Oshawatt, Servine, and Emboar?
[QUOTE=Itachi_Crow;34409036]uh he was almost nothing like mewtwo he had one attack that was in common and that was his neutral b[/QUOTE] well fuck, then I really must have forgotten everything about melee uh, I remember that Mario's B+Down (I think) was a lot better than it is in Brawl [editline]27th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=eatdembeanz;34419999]If there's at least one new character, make it possible to switch out Pokemon Trainer's generation of Pokemon. Instead of Squirtle, Ivysaur, and Charizard, maybe Oshawatt, Servine, and Emboar?[/QUOTE] ALL OF MY RAGE at least make it Totodile, Chikorita and Cyndaquil, not these unknown, digimon look alikes
Why would you not add this, Nintendo of America? [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1HEmAxePWM[/media]
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;34420354]well fuck, then I really must have forgotten everything about melee uh, I remember that Mario's B+Down (I think) was a lot better than it is in Brawl [editline]27th January 2012[/editline] ALL OF MY RAGE at least make it Totodile, Chikorita and Cyndaquil, not these unknown, digimon look alikes[/QUOTE] Wait... Tepig's a digimon lookalike?
[QUOTE=eatdembeanz;34421268]Wait... Tepig's a digimon lookalike?[/QUOTE] it's a joke but seriously, nobody likes the new generations and it'd make sense to add the second generation, since SSBB's Pokemon Trainer had the starter pokemons from the first gen.
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;34421345]it's a joke [B]but seriously, nobody likes the new generations[/B] and it'd make sense to add the second generation, since SSBB's Pokemon Trainer had the starter pokemons from the first gen.[/QUOTE] Really, now?
[QUOTE=LegndNikko;34421527]Really, now?[/QUOTE] it sucks
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;34421594]it sucks[/QUOTE] Elaborate
The new generations don't fit the original style, which was what made me (and millions of other people) enjoy Pokemon in the first place. The new Pokemon look retarded, is what I'm trying to say. They're not cool at all, and I really can't play any of the new games without thinking "Wait, is this REALLY Pokemon?"
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;34422019]The new generations don't fit the original style, which was what made me (and millions of other people) enjoy Pokemon in the first place. The new Pokemon look retarded, is what I'm trying to say. They're not cool at all, and I really can't play any of the new games without thinking "Wait, is this REALLY Pokemon?"[/QUOTE] What do you define as the "original style?" How do they look "retarded?" [editline]27th January 2012[/editline] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KsHEE.jpg[/IMG] 17, why?
The eyes are different and overall there's a large focus away from animals towards anthromorphic and object-based forms, they're uninspired. There's pokemon that are just icecream cones and others are a pile of garbage with arms. The fact that pokemon are made of boldly colored shapes rather than drawn like actual animals makes them just look like they belong in their own series. If you read the lore on the newer pokemon half of it doesn't make any sense, because they're trying to make sense of a floating coffin with ghost arms- which all happen to be identical, it just makes no sense where as the original 150 and even a generation or two beyond had some sense and when lore was explained it fit together well. The newest generation literally is that comic of the pokemon artist just thinking up a toilet and adding a face and limbs to it.
[QUOTE=LegndNikko;34422108]What do you define as the "original style?" How do they look "retarded?"[/QUOTE] [img]http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/5/51/582MS.png[/img] Hi, I'm the ice-cream in a cup pokemon. My name is Vanillite. [img]http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/7/70/583MS.png[/img] Hi, I'm the ice-cream in a cone pokemon. My name is Vanillish. [img]http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/8/83/584MS.png[/img] Hi, I'm the ice-cream in a double-cone pokemon. My name is Vanilluxe. And they could've redeemed that concept with an alternate third evolution: trade the second one whilst it's holding a metal coat. Makes the ice-cream with razor blades in pokemon, called "Vanillouch".
[QUOTE=LegndNikko;34422108] 17, why?[/QUOTE] then you have no notion of style, at all
[QUOTE=Badunkadunk;34423152]pile of garbage with arms.[/QUOTE] Grimer/Muk [QUOTE=Badunkadunk;34423152]original 150[/QUOTE] Ok, now you're just trolling. Mew exists! Why does no one understand this? Yes it's unobtainable without exploits, but it still exists. Stop saying origonal 150.
New gen pokemon: [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/534.png[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/545.png[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/561.png[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/569.png[/url] Old pokemon: [url]http://serebii.net/pokedex/evo/043.gif[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/pokedex/evo/012.gif[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/pokedex/evo/066.gif[/url] If you can't see the change in style, you're either trolling or you need glasses
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;34423223]New gen pokemon: [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/534.png[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/545.png[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/561.png[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/blackwhite/pokemon/569.png[/url] Old pokemon: [url]http://serebii.net/pokedex/evo/043.gif[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/pokedex/evo/012.gif[/url] [url]http://serebii.net/pokedex/evo/066.gif[/url] If you can't see the change in style, you're either trolling or you need glasses[/QUOTE] The new pokemon have more details and unique concepts. What are you proving?
[QUOTE=Lazyboy0337;34423208]Grimer/Muk[/QUOTE] It's not about what they are, it's how they're drawn [editline]28th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Lazyboy0337;34423235]The new pokemon have more details and unique concepts. What are you proving?[/QUOTE] are you even reading the thread
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.