Dota 2 - "slapping your ballsack against the keyboard waiting for the pretty bars above the enemys h
4,115 replies, posted
[QUOTE=The Mighty Boat;35941583]nobody is going to ahve any idea what the fuck youre talking about[/QUOTE]
3 people instantly reacted with correct answer to your "who?" about Tequoia.
It's not an army, but will do
[QUOTE=Tokagero;35941574]Silence/Damage Buff Heal on Kill Move speed steroid if enemy is hurt / reveal Move = Damage debuff
Nuke/Slow (buffed at night) Silence (buffed at night) AS/MS steroid(works at night) Night time on demand
Suuuure, they are so similar, you can just call one worse version of the other.
It's like saying Zeus is just a real shitty Tinker, or Enchantress is just real shitty Chen[/QUOTE]
theyre both solo laning level dependant gankers who cant gank before 6. they both have vision-based gimmicks. ns's silence is similar to bloodseekers in length except it doesnt also give the enemy a damage boost. they both have ms boost passives and steroids, except nightstalkers steroid doesnt also silence him. how are they not fucking similar?
I never heard NP called tequoia.
[QUOTE=titopei;35941677]I never heard NP called tequoia.[/QUOTE]
Because no one is going to call him that. Even casters still call him Furion.
[QUOTE=The Mighty Boat;35941615]theyre both solo laning level dependant gankers who cant gank before 6. they both have vision-based gimmicks. ns's silence is similar to bloodseekers in length except it doesnt also give the enemy a damage boost. they both have ms boost passives and steroids, except nightstalkers passive doesnt also silence him. how are they not fucking similar?[/QUOTE]
They are similar, but not in the way you described it. You just said "shitty" version of one another.
I think there are more differences than similarities.
NS can gank effectively before level 6, he just needs night time preferably, as he has some sort of CC, i.e. slow and ministun. Bloodseeker doesn;t have that at all, he is purely right-click, unless you count in Bloodrage harass with the DoT it applies (of course, pre-6, then comes the Rupture)
NS ganks are based on his insane speed at night, Bloodseeker looks for overextended people who will have to retreat or die if they are ganked. Unless 100% certain of a kill, he can't dive. He has nice Str gain, but not enough to make him tanky without items. Night Stalker doesn't give 2 fucks about towers if it's night.
Night Stalker doesn't have good means to farm, and while it might seem silly, Bloodseeker does with his Bloodrage Buff and heal on kill. He can clear camps/waves quickly with some damage items, coming out with just mana loss and no health damage.
Night Stalker is buffy, so he can initiate teamfights in certain situations. Bloodseeker can't, as it defies purpose of his Rupture, which is to keep enemy in position he can't survive in or choose to lose hp. Rupture in teamfight, unless used for cleanup, will just make enemy a bit less mobile.
Night Stalker silence is faultless, try silencing anti-mage as Bloodseeker.
Night Stalker has issues in lane if enemy has good harassment, and if it's mid, controls the runes. Bloodseeker with just stout shield is hard to get rid of, as in moments notice, he will be back to full hp, rendering all your previous harass useless.
Night Stalker has wings, Seeker just a fancy hat.
It might seem as NS comes on top, but thats only if you consider ganks with his ultimate up / at night. Seeker doesn't have this issue, has more punishing ultimate in terms of ganks (you can still run away from stalker with a stun or slow), is agility hero i.e. carries harder, is great clean-up chaser and anti-chaser with Rupture, can buff carries with 80% damage (void after ulltimate? he won't need to cast anyway) and heals easily. Night Stalker also has great strenghts that allow him to outclass Seeker in various scenarios, but not to a point where Strygwyr is "shittier" version of Balanar.
[QUOTE=Maruhai;35937702]Easily countered if you're not playing against retards.[/QUOTE]
was just asking a question there's no need to bombard me with dumbs, but think of it this way, most games no one even wards or dusts for riki or any other invis heroes, I highly doubt they're going to do it for a hero who doesn't even have it as an active and moreso an optional invis
ive never heard anyone call rexxar by whatever the fuck his name is now, and i bet everyone is still going to call thrall thrall
[QUOTE=The Mighty Boat;35941755]ive never heard anyone call rexxar by whatever the fuck his name is now, and i bet everyone is still going to call thrall thrall[/QUOTE]
thrall is a lot more renowned than rexxar is
just my 2c
Beastmaster was in the game for far longer than Disruptor.
[QUOTE=l l;35941793]thrall is a lot more renowned than rexxar is
just my 2c[/QUOTE]
everyone still calls him rexxar
Just played with a pudge who dc'd because the other team had 2 mids.
I got matched with a 4some of brazillians. At least they all dc'd with him after 5 mins.
[QUOTE=The Mighty Boat;35941755]ive never heard anyone call rexxar by whatever the fuck his name is now, and i bet everyone is still going to call thrall thrall[/QUOTE]
Karroch.
I don't mind the change, as I didn't spend years playing first Dota (just a dozen or so matches, mostly shop & people made me not stick around), so it's not hard to switch to new ones. Some people play on Classic key binds, I find new QWERDF just perfect. It's all prefference, so you can keep calling NP Furion and BM Rexxar.
I like Tequoia and Karroch.
I dont even remember the new names lol
[QUOTE=TehWoodPcker;35941905]I dont even remember the new names lol[/QUOTE]
Titles are more often used anyway. I find them quite nice and they seem to stick easy, also a lot of them stayed the same, like Balanar, Atropos, N'aix.
Some heroes I call by the new names, others I call by the old (Furion, bara, rhasta, leoric)
[QUOTE=titopei;35941938]Some heroes I call by the new names, others I call by the old (Furion, bara, rhasta, leoric)[/QUOTE]
Out of those 4, only Furion didn't stay the same.
[QUOTE=Tokagero;35941961]Out of those 4, only Furion didn't stay the same.[/QUOTE]
leoric was ostarion
bara was called barathum or some shit like that
and leoric is called ostarion or some bullshit that sounds like that now
[QUOTE=Tokagero;35941961]Out of those 4, only Furion didn't stay the same.[/QUOTE]
I'm talking about the way dota 2 calls it
oh my god can people stop leaving every fucking game for the love of god
I lost like 5 games in a row because it always was 3v5
I even went 1v4 as a juggernaut once. Actually outleveled them alone.
Funny, could've sworn SK was called Leoric in Dota 2 not so long ago. Ostarion doesn't sound bad, and keeping Leoric could make Activision Blizzard try something funny.
Rhasta is still Rhasta.
Bara is short for Barathrum, which is still his name in Dota 2.
[QUOTE=Antary;35942051]oh my god can people stop leaving every fucking game for the love of god
I lost like 5 games in a row because it always was 3v5
I even went 1v4 as a juggernaut once. Actually outleveled them alone.[/QUOTE]
I thought if someone left a game after 5 minutes when they get an abondon and it's safe to leave then it wont count against you but it will count if you win
[QUOTE=Japancakes;35942253]I thought if someone left a game after 5 minutes when they get an abondon and it's safe to leave then it wont count against you but it will count if you win[/QUOTE]
I dont play for statistics.
[QUOTE=Antary;35942310]I dont play for statistics.[/QUOTE]
Then just leave after it's safe to abandon
