[QUOTE=Sibilantjoe;21675912]Eh, it really seems like CoD was always the "action movie" kinda games. You always play as the one guy who will save the day while everyone else is dying and/or exploding. CoD4 built on that as well, with the slow-motion bits and first-person dramatic cutscenes. It's never really been about "realism," MW2 was just ridiculous, that's all.[/QUOTE]
In CoD2 (and I assume 1, I've never played it) you had a consistant squad, they allways had the same model and name, they never died and they actually killed people. In CoD4 there was only a handful of people who stayed most of the game and MW2 had less. It went from you're just a regular soldier who barely makes it through the horrors of war to supah bad ass 1337 soldier who can take out armies alone.
[QUOTE=Blackfire;21671920]That sucks you only get 50-60 bucks to spend on games in one year?[/QUOTE]
I dont make much money to get games.
Plus,MW2 lowered my expectations of future call of duty games, but I'm glad Infinity Ward is quitting. I actually liked WaW and I'm looking forward to reviews for this game..
But if it turns out to be like MW2 where I spend 6 hours on the campaign and get to second prestige then get sick of it and uninstall it 4 weeks after I get it..
then I wont buy it
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;21676292]In CoD2 (and I assume 1, I've never played it) you had a consistant squad, they allways had the same model and name, they never died and they actually killed people. In CoD4 there was only a handful of people who stayed most of the game and MW2 had less. It went from you're just a regular soldier who barely makes it through the horrors of war to supah bad ass 1337 soldier who can take out armies alone.[/QUOTE]
While 1, its expansions and 2 had squadmates that actually would kill a few enemies here and there, the player was the one that had to "lead the way" and make the breakthroughs.
[QUOTE=Tac Error;21676385]While 1, its expansions and 2 had squadmates that actually would kill a few enemies here and there, the player was the one that had to "lead the way" and make the breakthroughs.[/QUOTE]
Yeah but that's in every game. The point is they were always with you and you constantly had them rushing ahead (though mostly at scripted sequences). In MW2 it ends with Soap and Price running through the tunnels wiping out Shepard's men, at least 50 of them.
It's gonna fucking suck. They are just whoring an already dead series that features shitty multiplayer as it's main attraction.
But the thing is it will sell because all the 12 year olds who play it will cry if they don't get it.
The SP looks cool, might borrow it from a friend for it.
[QUOTE=dvsilverwing;21671832]There is no subscription fee as far as I know, I think he's thinking about the MMO CoD game they were talking about.[/QUOTE]
Oh, is that it? I thought this one was going to be the one with the subscription fee.
Dedicated servers? :frown:
Call of Duty is an overrated series in my opinion right now. And now they are making two games (I heard there was a Vietnam project being developed) in less than 7 months of the last entry's release? It's sad because they are repeating what happened to Halo.
Only good ones were 2 and 4. The rest of them are total shit.
I thought CoD 1 was pretty good. It certainly was a nice change of pace compared to Medal of Honor.
Milking a dead cow is gross.
[QUOTE=venn177;21679079]Milking a dead cow is gross.[/QUOTE]
I don't like dead cow milk.
[QUOTE=Sibilantjoe;21675912]Eh, it really seems like CoD was always the "action movie" kinda games. You always play as the one guy who will save the day while everyone else is dying and/or exploding. CoD4 built on that as well, with the slow-motion bits and first-person dramatic cutscenes. It's never really been about "realism," MW2 was just ridiculous, that's all.[/QUOTE]
Well you're right, though the new one seem a bit over the top, although I quite enjoyed the campaigns but it didn't feel like a good old fashioned Call of Duty to me.
This looks like an expansion pack but no doubt it will cost an extortionate amount of money while only adding a few hours of a new SP campaign and one or two gameplay additions
OP, Akayz, you are someone that I don't get. you like nothing but old music and you love new games that are of the lowest quality, while being the most popular. You act like a shit head to anyone that doesn't like your music, lambast pop music, and all music of today, BUT THIS IS THE GAME YOU WANT?
I'll judge the game [I]after[/I] it comes out.
I'll see what people say about this game when it comes out.
I mean it looks kinda good but so did MW2 and in my opinion that came out shite, well singleplayer was kinda good but too short, could've had more effort, especially for PC. The multiplayer was uninspiring.
If this game has mixed reviews like MW2 did then I will definatly not buy it. If everyone hails it as the best thing since jesus sneezed gold then i will probably wait for a price drop.
I reckon whatever company s making this game needs some more money for another party.
A new call of duty game seems to be an annual thing now, unfortnatly.
Should spend more time making a full complete game, without the need to dlc packs to add new life to a stale product before waggling a new bone in the face of the insecure guys who feel they need to virtually massacre each other to prove their worth.
The idiots who buy the same game in a different colour every yeardeserve to be robbed of their money
As much as I'd like to believe this might be closer to COD4 than MW2...it's being made by Treyarch. I have no hope for this game.
Hard to say how this will turn out. Probably not that great just like 4 and 6.
[QUOTE=Killerjc;21678462]The SP looks cool, might borrow it from a friend for it.[/QUOTE]
Maybe they will add a drm this time
[QUOTE=Ignhelper;21684931]Maybe they will add a drm this time[/QUOTE]
called a console bro
I'm just wondering something guys.
Why are you comparing the 1 minute some-odd trailer to two games made by a different company? That just really doesn't make any sense.
[QUOTE=Stupideye;21684544]Hard to say how this will turn out. Probably not that great just like 4 and 6.[/QUOTE]
disagree.......
cod5 was a lot different in my opinion than cod4 in terms of gameplay
although they are both the same engine..plus nazi zombies....infinity ward would have never come up with that
[QUOTE=Stupideye;21684544]Hard to say how this will turn out. Probably not that great just like 4 and 6.[/QUOTE]
4 was great, 5 sucked, 6 sucked
I hate being stuck in the past where these mysterious CoD5s and 6s haven't come out yet. Last one was MW2 and it sucked, before that WaW and before that CoD4.
[QUOTE=kevlar jens;21691478]4 was great, 5 sucked, 6 sucked[/QUOTE]
Compared to 2 and even 3, 4 was garbage.
[QUOTE=Stupideye;21695479]Compared to 2 and even 3, 4 was garbage.[/QUOTE]
The first two were the only truly great games. Three was okay, four was decent, I liked five for the Nazi Zombies, it's a great way to play with friends if you having nothing else to do, and six was just too over-the-top for me.
I have to agree with the other people in this thread, the series should return to what it was, you were still in the lead, but you're not some nigh-invulnerable super-soldier like in the newer ones.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
