[QUOTE=Andriko123;17405096]Would a third attachment be a bit too much?[/QUOTE]
YES. Haha, an ACOG, heartbeat sensor, and nade launcher all on the M16.
What does everyone else think that the pro perk version of bling will be?
[quote=tyler72493;17407125]yes. Haha, an acog, heartbeat sensor, and nade launcher all on the m16.[/quote]
3 HEARTBEAT SENSORS fuck yeah
[QUOTE=K1ngo64;17403419]When I looked at that menu it reminded me that the menu lagged and stuttered at around 30 FPS, but ingame I always had 60+ FPS with maxed settings. What the fuck?
Anyone care to explain why that happens? :confused:[/QUOTE]
That always happens to me to, something like it stutters for the first 10 seconds on the menu or so then it catches up.
Cold Blooded makes you invisible to anything that detects [i]heat[/i] signatures. Heartbeat sensor does not detect heat.
[QUOTE=yuki;17412132]Cold Blooded makes you invisible to anything that detects [i]heat[/i] signatures. Heartbeat sensor does not detect heat.[/QUOTE]
I have the feeling the Pro version of Cold Blooded will make you invisible to heartbeat, though.
Does anyone else think the weapons in this game look nothing like what they're supposed to be? Compare the Famas in the game to one from Google Images, the sights are way different and it looks a bit less bulky than in MW2. In this video: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGmVvMmcG8[/url] that gun is the UMP 45, it looks nothing like one. Compare it to this picture.
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/V5wKzW.jpg[/img]
It'd look fine if it were less bulky and had a smaller rear sight.
We'll have to wait until an accurate video comes out, not a shaky cam, but yes they do like kind of strange.
as long as it looks sexy and kills i'll use it.
and by kills i mean kills every single fucker thats on the enemy team in 1 shot
[QUOTE=dragon1972;17419595]Does anyone else think the weapons in this game look nothing like what they're supposed to be? Compare the Famas in the game to one from Google Images, the sights are way different and it looks a bit less bulky than in MW2. In this video: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGmVvMmcG8[/url] that gun is the UMP 45, it looks nothing like one. Compare it to this picture.
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/V5wKzW.jpg[/img]
It'd look fine if it were less bulky and had a smaller rear sight.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I thought the UMP looked really off too.
[QUOTE=dragon1972;17419595]Does anyone else think the weapons in this game look nothing like what they're supposed to be? Compare the Famas in the game to one from Google Images, the sights are way different and it looks a bit less bulky than in MW2. In this video: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGmVvMmcG8[/url] that gun is the UMP 45, it looks nothing like one. Compare it to this picture.
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/V5wKzW.jpg[/img]
It'd look fine if it were less bulky and had a smaller rear sight.[/QUOTE]
That's because all the guns have to look Tact1co0l. Otherwise the little kids and stoners will think that a small, accurate model will make the weapon work shit (nothing against stoners mind you). Most of the guns in the game that I have seen so far have been the kind of weapon that you'd expect to see in some cliched, generic Hollywood film. They just look like they were designed to have scopes for your scopes, and suppressor for your triggers.
Don't forget the supressed grenade launchers.
[QUOTE=ababs362;17421280]Don't forget the supressed grenade launchers.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://world.guns.ru/grenade/gl53-e.htm[/url]
What will they think of next...
Oh man, how did I forget the sights for your magazines, if you can't see where you're putting that, how on earth are you meant to reload?
[editline]12:45AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Timebomb757;17421321][url]http://world.guns.ru/grenade/gl53-e.htm[/url]
What will they think of next...[/QUOTE]
Is that being fired by a kid or a midget :confused:
All the guns have picatinny rails up the ass.
Not that that's a bad thing
[editline]07:58PM[/editline]
But I do hope the model of the gun changes with which attachments you have. Like in cod4, the m16 would lose it's front sight if you had a scope.
they need to come out with more than one more skin for the guns in my opinion.
and by that i mean more than the snow camo
[QUOTE=Grif STL;17421632]they need to come out with more than one more skin for the guns in my opinion.
and by that i mean more than the snow camo[/QUOTE]
I've always thought of the original black made the gun look so much better than any camo could. I hated the camos, actually. Especially desert.
[QUOTE=Tyler72493;17421830]I've always thought of the original black made the gun look so much better than any camo could. I hated the camos, actually. Especially desert.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, especially since there weren't any true "desert" maps in COD: 4, your gun stuck out like sore thumb. I always stuck with matte black.
[QUOTE=Tyler72493;17421830]I've always thought of the original black made the gun look so much better than any camo could. I hated the camos, actually. Especially desert.[/QUOTE]
I liked red tiger.
The digital camo was nice. Besides that, all the camoes sucked.
I never use camo because it makes the gun look shit.
[editline]04:06PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=dragon1972;17419595]Does anyone else think the weapons in this game look nothing like what they're supposed to be? Compare the Famas in the game to one from Google Images, the sights are way different and it looks a bit less bulky than in MW2. In this video: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGmVvMmcG8[/url] that gun is the UMP 45, it looks nothing like one. Compare it to this picture.
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/V5wKzW.jpg[/img]
It'd look fine if it were less bulky and had a smaller rear sight.[/QUOTE]
I think it looks fine, considering all the attachments in the game. So I would imagine it's been made to accommodate that by having rails everywhere. :D
Pre-ordered this, payed for it. Can't wait.
[QUOTE=dragon1972;17419595]Does anyone else think the weapons in this game look nothing like what they're supposed to be? Compare the Famas in the game to one from Google Images, the sights are way different and it looks a bit less bulky than in MW2. In this video: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGmVvMmcG8[/url] that gun is the UMP 45, it looks nothing like one. Compare it to this picture.
[img]http://imgkk.com/i/V5wKzW.jpg[/img]
It'd look fine if it were less bulky and had a smaller rear sight.[/QUOTE]
I agree.
I was like "what gun is that? a kriss or what?"
infinity ward, i'm really happy for you, and ima let you finish up Modern Warfare 2.
But the original Call of Duty was the best call of duty of all time!
OF ALL TIME!
[QUOTE=seano12;17427886]infinity ward, i'm really happy for you, and ima let you finish up Modern Warfare 2.
But the original Call of Duty was the best call of duty of all time!
OF ALL TIME![/QUOTE]
shuty fucky upy
cod 4 is the best
At first, I thought the first person UMP45 was a Kriss Super V, because it was so fucking wide.
[QUOTE=seano12;17427886]infinity ward, i'm really happy for you, and ima let you finish up Modern Warfare 2.
But the original Call of Duty was the best call of duty of all time!
OF ALL TIME![/QUOTE]
:patriot:
[QUOTE=seano12;17427886]infinity ward, i'm really happy for you, and ima let you finish up Modern Warfare 2.
But the original Call of Duty was the best call of duty of all time!
OF ALL TIME![/QUOTE]
Get out jackass
[img]http://www.jewsonfirst.org/images/obama8.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Bredirish123;17421912]Yeah, especially since there weren't any true "desert" maps in COD: 4, your gun stuck out like sore thumb. I always stuck with matte black.[/QUOTE]
I found the camos utterly pointless but I just stuck digital on everything.
It still looks cool and that's all that matters
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
