• Modern Warfare 2
    2,000 replies, posted
[QUOTE=gbtygfvyg;17785422]i think we're talking about 2 different shootouts.[/QUOTE] [quote]Many officers debate as to whether Phillips commited suicide or accidentally shot himself while trying to reload his gun with one hand to continue firing at officers[/quote] [quote]At least one SWAT officer fired his M16 rifle below the cars and wounded Matasareanu in his unprotected lower legs[/quote] The North Hollywood shootout? :/ I think in the airport scene you play as the Russian special forces eliminating the remainder of the terrorists, in the first trailer, you see some russian SWAT-like vehicles along with Special forces.
Sucks how spec-op mode is only 2 players
i dont think so
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;17788366]Sucks how spec-op mode is only 2 players[/QUOTE] It's not, it's made for 4
[QUOTE=Teh Zip File;17783411][url]http://www.gametrailers.com/episode/gametrailers-tv/74&ch=3&sd=1?ep=74&ch=3&sd=1[/url] [img]http://i35.tinypic.com/j9re4o.jpg[/img][img]http://i36.tinypic.com/2hsbta8.jpg[/img] He comes in at around 12:15. [editline]06:03PM[/editline] Cool, it tells you what the gun you're about to pick up has on it.[/QUOTE] Wow. I love it. :dance:
[QUOTE=bepassley;17787469]no i dont like chinatown what gave you that idea [/QUOTE] But it's the remake of Carentan from original call of duty... Kids these days
[QUOTE=seano12;17788655]But it's the remake of Carentan from original call of duty... Kids these days[/QUOTE] I never played the original, I was saying the maps I liked, not the maps that were good idiots these days
Let's hope the AI gets better, and use good tactics.
Here are some magazine scans: [img]http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/7996/mw1.jpg[/img] [img]http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/7205/mw2.jpg[/img] [img]http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/8229/mw3.jpg[/img] [img]http://img126.imageshack.us/img126/1302/mw4.jpg[/img] [img]http://img389.imageshack.us/img389/3394/mw5.jpg[/img]
For us non sideways head people. [img]http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg127/JakeValdor/MW2-1.jpg[/img] [img]http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg127/JakeValdor/MW2-2.jpg[/img] [img]http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg127/JakeValdor/MW2-4.jpg[/img] [img]http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg127/JakeValdor/Mw2-3.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=tacoriffik;17788573]It's not, it's made for 4[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure it's for 2 players only [QUOTE=Call of Duty Wiki;17788573]A new Special Ops mode will include two-player cooperative play[/QUOTE] [url]http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Call_of_Duty:_Modern_Warfare_2[/url]
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;17790464]I'm pretty sure it's for 2 players only [url]http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Call_of_Duty:_Modern_Warfare_2[/url][/QUOTE] Yeah, it is only made for 2 player co-op.
I like your definition of 'scans'
Those aren't scans. Those are shittily taken photos.
I think the heavy units will be an ass in spec ops.
[QUOTE=Tac Error;17332916]The heaviest vehicle you'll probably get would be a BTR or [b] Stryker [/b], not main battle tanks.[/QUOTE] A [b] STRYKER?!?!?! [/b] I don't think you understand how close a stryker gets to actually being a tank, thats some heavy ass machinery right there.
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;17790464]I'm pretty sure it's for 2 players only [url]http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Call_of_Duty:_Modern_Warfare_2[/url][/QUOTE] Awww.. My friends said it would be 4 player. Not a big deal I can just play multiplayer with them anyway
[QUOTE=Benji;17786945]I'm so fucking pumped for this. Can't wait to get my new xbox and a copy of this.[/QUOTE] how in the nine hells can anyone disagree with something only HE would know anything about? HE is pumped for this game and HE can't wait for his new xbox... enlighten me please, i wanna know the trick.
[QUOTE=Dachande;17792452]A [b] STRYKER?!?!?! [/b] I don't think you understand how close a stryker gets to actually being a tank, thats some heavy ass machinery right there.[/QUOTE] Any anti-armor weapon invented since the 50s can penetrate Stryker armor. They're notorious for being deathtraps. I'd hardly call in a tank.
[QUOTE=Sector 7;17801084]Any anti-armor weapon invented since the 50s can penetrate Stryker armor. They're notorious for being deathtraps. I'd hardly call in a tank.[/QUOTE] The sad truth. It's no better armored than a BMP and .50 will penetrate the front at about 50 feet, and the side/rear from medium-long distances.
[QUOTE=Leon;17801101]The sad truth. It's no better armored than a BMP and .50 will penetrate the front at about 50 feet, and the side/rear from medium-long distances.[/QUOTE] Holy shit i knew they weren't good but that's terrible.
[QUOTE=Angua;17801688]Holy shit i knew they weren't good but that's terrible.[/QUOTE] the bmp that is, will be penetrated by .50 except our uppity diggity military loves to classify information about vehicle armor. Almost everything we have asides from the M1 Abrams has absolute SHEEITE armor, they just don't want the commies/fascists/spacenazis/terrorists to know.
I'm still on the fence about it. Been in love with cod since vcod but I'm losing faith. It'll depend on how many of my friends get it and if reviews are good.
Would someone care to list everything you can do splitscreen on the consoles? I'd only be buying this game for local multiplayer.
If there are any Cod's you should get its MW2 and Call of duty 2
[QUOTE=Bomimo;17800656]how in the nine hells can anyone disagree with something only HE would know anything about? HE is pumped for this game and HE can't wait for his new xbox... enlighten me please, i wanna know the trick.[/QUOTE] um... If it bothers you that much, they probably think the opposite of what he thinks and that they aren't pumped
[QUOTE=ababs362;17802036]If there are any Cod's you should get its MW2 and Call of duty 2[/QUOTE] That and CoD 4, and CoD 1 Basically, all the infinity ward Call of Dutys are made of win Rate me Boxes
[QUOTE=seano12;17804288] Treyarch? Didn't they do Call of Duty United Offensive? Only win they ever made...[/QUOTE] That was Gray Matter who made United Offensive [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty:_United_Offensive[/url]
[url]http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/103109/Goggles-on-for-a-pervy-night-out-/[/url]
[QUOTE=Doozle;17810142][url]http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/103109/Goggles-on-for-a-pervy-night-out-/[/url][/QUOTE] Ahahahah, High quality! Hahahaha!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.