[QUOTE=BoBt3hBuNnY;17345488]If MW2 has Vehicular combat i'm cancelling my preorder.[/QUOTE]
The snowmobile sequence in SP is the only vehicle sequence I know of, I doubt they're going to include vehicular combat (MBTs and shit like that) in MP, partly because of technical limitations, partly because it just wouldn't be fun.
[QUOTE=Melkor;17332656]At least they're doing something new.[/QUOTE]
BF2 Modern Combat (1) has alot of vehicle combat (tanks, trucks, civilian cars ad trucks, apc's, helicopters and fighter jets)
[editline]08:22PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Mbbird;17345413]This isn't seeming like COD4 at all. Much faster paced...[/QUOTE]
yeah, i've been tellign people bf2 is better tha cod, but they don't listen to people who dont play cod XD
[QUOTE=Trainguyxx;17345610]
yeah, i've been tellign people bf2 is better tha cod, but they don't listen to people who dont play cod XD[/QUOTE]
I am a fan of both series actually, I've been playing COD4 for 2 almost 3 years now.
I'm buying both BFBC2 and MW2.
[QUOTE=Generic Monk;17345576]The snowmobile sequence in SP is the only vehicle sequence I know of, I doubt they're going to include vehicular combat (MBTs and shit like that) in MP, partly because of technical limitations, partly because it just wouldn't be fun.[/QUOTE]
I meant in MP, so that's good news.
The snowmobile sequence looks pretty orgasmic in SP.
If it's possible, first thing I'll do on the snowmobile is ride it off a cliff.
Do want
ok watched the afgan and downtown videos too
my god this is lookin to be fuckin great
now.. i wonder if i can tri-wield desert eagles
I call dibs on the opium farm ><
Some of the map icons seem a bit confusing, eg, the heli's just a oval shaped thing floating around on the map.
[QUOTE=bepassley;17347428]ok watched the afgan and downtown videos too
my god this is lookin to be fuckin great
now.. i wonder if i can tri-wield desert eagles[/QUOTE]
with your dick?
I'm loving that the lowest rank isn't even listed, it just calls you "[B]F[/B]ucking[B] N[/B]ew [B]G[/B]uy"
[QUOTE=Uberslug;17347545]with your dick?[/QUOTE]
it's 2009 i'm sure the US army could create some kind of prostetic limb with false nerve attachments that do a trigger pulling action when you tell it to.
That's [i]my[/i] future of gaming
[QUOTE=bepassley;17347651]it's 2009 i'm sure the US army could create some kind of prostetic limb with false nerve attachments that do a trigger pulling action when you tell it to.
That's [i]my[/i] future of gaming[/QUOTE]
Well [I]my[/I] future of gaming would be something more awesome like using your dick as a knife or using it to hold guns and shit.
They don't call it your third arm for nothing.
Death steaks is the dumbest Idea I've seen yet
I remember playing CoD 1 way back in the day
who woulda thought it would evolve into this?
[QUOTE=Generic Monk;17342820]We don't have to pay a ridiculous fee [b]on top of the internet fee[/b] to get access to content that, for all intents and purposes, [b]should be free[/b]. The internet fee is there for a [B]reason[/B], they are providing a [B]service[/B]. The Xbox live fee is there because the [B]majority[/B] (Note [B]majority[/B], not '[B]all[/B]') of the players have [B]nothing to compare it to[/B], you've [B]always[/B] been forced to pay for multiplayer, ever since the 'dawn of multiplayer gaming' [B]4 years ago[/B]. If sites like gamershell can offer fast, free access to demos, and movies, and infinity ward's, Valve's, hell, even [b]MICROSOFT'S[/b] servers offer multiplayer services to millions of PC gamers, why can't they do it for the Xbox?
[b]BECAUSE THE MAJORITY OF THEM DON'T KNOW ANY BETTER[/b][/QUOTE]
Let them milk the money from Live rather than somewhere else.
SORRY YOU CANNOT PLAY THIS GAME YOU DON'T HAVE THE REQUIRED CLOTHES FOR YOUR AVATAR
[QUOTE=Mbbird;17348058]Well [I]my[/I] future of gaming would be something more awesome like using your dick as a knife or using it to hold guns and shit.
They don't call it your third arm for nothing.[/QUOTE]
Third leg?
[QUOTE=waxrock;17343975]Time to rape new players on this game.[/QUOTE]
All 4 of the new players...
They better nerf the akimbo accuracy to half or a quarter of the actual.
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;17349893]
Third leg?[/QUOTE]
I dunno, you high five with your legs?
I always thought it was the joke "triple high-five".
[QUOTE=angelangel;17350040]They better nerf the akimbo accuracy to half or a quarter of the actual.[/QUOTE]
They probably will. Every other game with akimbo does.
If this game is anything like MW1 then I am [B]not[/B] buying it. I hated that game. I wish they would make games like they used to..
Medkits/Non-regenrating health
Melee does around 30dmg/Non-insta kill melee
Bullet penetration only on very thin materials not fucking concrete walls 2m thick
Spamming bullets is highly inaccurate and ineffective unless you are on a mounted gun
No perks
Killing sprees reward you in word phrases such as "Double Kill or Multikill" and not a fucking helicopter
Game developers focus on gameplay/replayability instead of graphics.
Basically Call of Duty 1.
Well those are just some of the things I can think of at the moment..
So reaching a bullet spewing enemy and managing to knife him rewards you with a non-instant kill?
Face it. You couldn't take a 6-12 inch knife to the chest, especially if it's by surprise.
I have to strongly disagree with you on most of those points though.
[QUOTE=Mbbird;17350597]Face it. You couldn't take a 6-12 inch knife to the chest, especially if it's by surprise.
I have to heavily disagree with you on most of those points though.[/QUOTE]
That isn't the point. I just find that melee kills require skill and not an insta-kill button press when in range. If you have ever played any other FPS game it usually would require you to swap to a melee weapon or melee with the weapon you are currently holding which would inflict a non-deadly amount of damage.
Call of Duty isn't supposed to be a realistic game. If you don't like it then you don't like the MW games. That's not our problem. Go back to COD1 if you liked it so much.
Broke automerge.
But reaching them is kinda requiring skill to begin with.
[QUOTE=Mbbird;17350645]Call of Duty isn't supposed to be a realistic game. If you don't like it then you don't like the MW series. That's not our problem. Go back to COD1 if you liked it so much.[/QUOTE]
Since the game is old it has a rather dead community and a lack of servers. Although I do play it on a LAN at school and it is much more amusing then the repetitive spawn killing and shitty gameplay mechanics in MW.
[editline]06:45PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Novangel;17350648]But reaching them is kinda requiring skill to begin with.[/QUOTE]
Hold the sprint button and run from behind. Stealth is essential in many situations.
[QUOTE=K1ngo64;17350663]Since the game is old it has a rather dead community and a lack of servers. Although I do play it on a LAN at school and it is much more amusing then the repetitive spawn killing and shitty gameplay mechanics in MW.
[editline]06:45PM[/editline]
Hold the sprint button and run from behind. Stealth is essential in many situations.[/QUOTE]
You say there is SPAWNKILLING in COD4? Are you openly opposing it just to be different? You can't spawn within 50 feet of someone more than once without having your entire teams spawnpoints moved across the map. COD4 had a decent dynamic spawn system. World at War did NOT.
COD1 is dead, that's true. So let it die and hope that another game comes out like it. MW2 or MW3 will not be that game.
I'm off to bed anyway.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
