League of Legends V22 - Welcome to the League of Draven
10,002 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Exploits;37071305]I didn't know Nautilus could solo laners.[/QUOTE]
I didn't know I said "Nautilus could solo laners." If you could point out where I said that I'd love to hear it.
[QUOTE=Protocol7;37071342]I didn't know I said "Nautilus could solo laners." If you could point out where I said that I'd love to hear it.[/QUOTE]
[quote]your example was "sejuani ganks early and permaslows the enemy champion while you wait for your teammate to catch up and actually deal damage"
for one, that's a bad gank and if they aren't under their tower 5 seconds after you enter lane, the person you've ganked is retarded.[/quote]
How is this different from Nautilus or the vast majority of ganking junglers? They aren't going to kill people by themselves, but they're going to crowd control them to the point where escape is impossible but fighting back is already disavantageous.
Honestly if the guy gets back to his tower in '5 seconds' that's to be expected. If your laner didn't respond to your gank after all of the crowd control then the real retard is them.
sejuani is still bad
Guys Heimerdinger is the best midlaner
[QUOTE=Exploits;37071305]That's why I keep saying it's an effective gap closer. I'm not using the word 'effective' to mean 'really really good' I mean it in the sense that the result is you're closer to them and you've closed a gap.[/QUOTE]
If that's the case then Fiddle has a gap closer
And so does Swain, Anivia, Karma, Olaf...
Let's just say everyone who has movement cc has an "effective" gap closer
He is like spamming rockets and stuff omg op
[QUOTE=Jund;37071422]If that's the case then Fiddle has a gap closer
And so does Swain, Anivia, Karma, Olaf...
Let's just say everyone who has movement cc has an "effective" gap closer[/QUOTE]
Any crowd control can be acted on as a gap closer. What do you guys to when Taric stuns someone in your lane for a gank, walk away? You get on top of them.
[QUOTE=Exploits;37071389]How is this different from Nautilus or the vast majority of ganking junglers? They aren't going to kill people by themselves, but they're going to crowd control them to the point where escape is impossible but fighting back is already disavantageous.
Honestly if the guy gets back to his tower in '5 seconds' that's to be expected. If your laner didn't respond to your gank after all of the crowd control then the real retard is them.[/QUOTE]
uh your example literally was
"Okay, so Sejuani is ganking you. She uses Arctic Assault, you Flash before it hits. She throws her ult at you, you're stunned for one second, possibly even two. Either way, she now casually trots up towards you, and once the stun runs out, she presses E and you're now slowed 70%"
and then the laner shows up in your scenario at that point. that's at least 2-3 seconds. your scenario was awful.
and even then, scheming for scenarios where Sejuani is viable does not mean she is a good champion. You point out one aspect she does, and I can show you a champion who achieves the same end result better. Even if the person playing Sejuani is good at her (which to begin with is rare) the only thing she's really good at is teamfights, and if she can't gank effectively to slow down the enemy's progression then there's a good chance she'll be useless there too.
exploits' example sounds like a child with ADD trying to describe a teamfight in LoL
"KARTHUS LIKE REQUIEMS JUST AS MORGANA ULTS AND AND AND FIDDLE ULTS IN AND SEJ TELEPORTS IN FROM THE SPAWN AND ULTS AND KILLS EVERYTHING AND EZREAL GETS AWAY BUT BUT NOBODY CAN ESCAPE SEJ BECAUSE PERMASLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW"
[QUOTE=Protocol7;37071469]uh your example literally was
"Okay, so Sejuani is ganking you. She uses Arctic Assault, you Flash before it hits. She throws her ult at you, you're stunned for one second, possibly even two. Either way, she now casually trots up towards you, and once the stun runs out, she presses E and you're now slowed 70%"
and then the laner shows up in your scenario at that point. that's at least 2-3 seconds. your scenario was awful.
and even then, scheming for scenarios where Sejuani is viable does not mean she is a good champion. You point out one aspect she does, and I can show you a champion who achieves the same end result better. Even if the person playing Sejuani is good at her (which to begin with is rare) the only thing she's really good at is teamfights, and if she can't gank effectively to slow down the enemy's progression then there's a good chance she'll be useless there too.[/QUOTE]
Oh, sorry, that example was for Jund since he didn't see how she could catch up to you on three possible separate occasions with her kit. It wasn't a blueprint for all her ganks or anything like that. If my laners were taking three seconds to respond to my gank attempts then the problem wouldn't really be Sejuani there.
[editline]3rd August 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Kondor58;37071525]exploits' example sounds like a child with ADD trying to describe a teamfight in LoL
"KARTHUS LIKE REQUIEMS JUST AS MORGANA ULTS AND AND AND FIDDLE ULTS IN AND SEJ TELEPORTS IN FROM THE SPAWN AND ULTS AND KILLS EVERYTHING AND EZREAL GETS AWAY BUT BUT NOBODY CAN ESCAPE SEJ BECAUSE PERMASLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW"[/QUOTE]
Fuck off.
[QUOTE=Kondor58;37071525]exploits' example sounds like a child with ADD trying to describe a teamfight in LoL
"KARTHUS LIKE REQUIEMS JUST AS MORGANA ULTS AND AND AND FIDDLE ULTS IN AND SEJ TELEPORTS IN FROM THE SPAWN AND ULTS AND KILLS EVERYTHING AND EZREAL GETS AWAY BUT BUT NOBODY CAN ESCAPE SEJ BECAUSE PERMASLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW"[/QUOTE]
and more importantly why are you wasting your ulti on someone who just flashed away
i keep envisioning this being a level 6 top lane gank and nothing about his scenario is reminiscent of a good play at all
[QUOTE=Protocol7;37071554]and more importantly why are you wasting your ulti on someone who just flashed away
i keep envisioning this being a level 6 top lane gank and nothing about his scenario is reminiscent of a good play at all[/QUOTE]
Why is it 'wasting'? It still stands as an example and an example only either way.
Jesus christ I just had to dodge for the fifth time because some retard who wanted to Karthus Top decided to Random
[B]FUCK THIS GAME[/B]
[QUOTE=Exploits;37071606]Why is it 'wasting'? It still stands as an example and an example only either way.[/QUOTE]
I think I just got what you mean. Do you mean they used Flash so your gank is already successful?
Yeah, I agree to this. I don't go throwing my ult around for shits or giggles or anything. Once again it's just to stand as example, if you're absolutely going for a kill to say, press an objective after or a lane or something, whatever, there's a lot of ways for you to get that kill.
I'll just let statistics speak for themselves,
[t]http://puu.sh/OlJW[/t]
[t]http://puu.sh/OlKh[/t]
Not only is Nautilus picked almost 14 times as much, his win rate is on average higher and more consistent
Oh look, a shitstorm that I didn't start.
Nice
[QUOTE=Blueplastic;37071738]Oh look, a shitstorm that I didn't start.
Nice[/QUOTE]
Were you planning on starting one?
[QUOTE=Protocol7;37071865]Were you planning on starting one?[/QUOTE]
No, but usually I am the one who starts one
[editline]3rd August 2012[/editline]
Because everyone hates me
qq
I wanna learn to jungle but every time I do I usually end up failing horribly and not wanting to do it anymore. :(
[QUOTE=RetaDepa;37069170]I don't know if anyone else has noticed this but on the LoL wiki page for Teemo there's a really fucking creepy guy in the comments section called [url=http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/User:Beautiful_Moon]Beautiful Moon[/url] who has an unhealthy obsession with him.[/QUOTE]
That is fucking creepy.
[QUOTE=Blueplastic;37071874]No, but usually I am the one who starts one
[editline]3rd August 2012[/editline]
Because everyone hates me
qq[/QUOTE]
Well that's because you just come into the thread and drop a bombshell like "Rabadon's Deathcap is shit" :v:
[QUOTE=Protocol7;37071983]Well that's because you just come into the thread and drop a bombshell like "Rabadon's Deathcap is shit" :v:[/QUOTE]
I'd never say such a thing wtf
[QUOTE=Blueplastic;37072011]I'd never say such a thing wtf[/QUOTE]
Well probably not for Rabadon's but you have just said things like that in the past.
But it's okay if you want to say Sejuani is shit right now though
Sejuani is shit?
Sejuani is shit
[QUOTE=Blueplastic;37072055]Sejuani is shit?
Sejuani is shit[/QUOTE]
Sejuani is shit
[QUOTE=Blueplastic;37072055]Sejuani is shit?
Sejuani is shit[/QUOTE]
Sejuani is shit
Sejuani is shit
[QUOTE=Blueplastic;37072055]Sejuani is shit?
Sejuani is shit[/QUOTE]
wow wtf quit starting a shitstorm blueplastic
Sejuani is shit
[QUOTE=Protocol7;37071694]I'll just let statistics speak for themselves,
Not only is Nautilus picked almost 14 times as much, his win rate is on average higher and more consistent[/QUOTE]
This isn't shocking information, it's the exact reason we've been having this debate to begin with. You're just giving reason for why you think what you do, I'm explaining why it isn't so cut and dry.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.