Medal of Honor (2010) - "Call of Honor: Medal of Duty" - Games

I just played the beta yesterday, it's actually not that bad. They did mix CoD and Battlefield/Bad Company together, which isn't that bad IMO. I might buy it, the beta was actually pretty fun. [editline]04:24PM[/editline] I just played the beta yesterday, it's actually not that bad. They did mix CoD and Battlefield/Bad Company together, which isn't that bad IMO. I might buy it, the beta was actually pretty fun.

Still debating if I want to buy this game or not.

[QUOTE=Legend286;25296909]Yeah, delay it because a couple of whiny fucks with insignificant opinions are basing the game's quality on it's poorly made MP.[/QUOTE] Game? There seems to be something wrong with your statement. Its not a game, its just a BC2 reskin... Say, wasn't this game going to have killstreaks aswell? I remember something like this before in a video having killstreaks, and it wasn't cod I think...

[QUOTE=dass;25307929]Game? There seems to be something wrong with your statement. Its not a game, its just a BC2 reskin... Say, wasn't this game going to have killstreaks aswell? I remember something like this before in a video having killstreaks, and it wasn't cod I think...[/QUOTE] How is the [u][b]singleplayer[/b][/u] a bc2 reskin? The MP is just a tacked on piece of shit by our resident Dice, makers of badly balanced and overall shit mp shooters.

i was on the verge of clicking the preorder button today when i saw a thread on the EA forums about a justin.tv livestream where the guy finished the sp in 4 hours whatshudido whatshudido [editline]07:30PM[/editline] oh and cue killz2much saying i told you so but the info isn't exactly reliable either so

So many cheaters and snipers in multiplayer. That is all.

actually nevermind even if the sp is short as long as it is an amazing experience i won't mind and the devs said themselves it takes 10-12 hours to beat on medium so

I thought the sniper situation from Bad Company 2 was bad but damn this game takes the cake. It's essentially BC2 with all of the good bits removed. I'm not going touch this ever again.

[QUOTE=Legend286;25308251]How is the [u][b]singleplayer[/b][/u] a bc2 reskin? The MP is just a tacked on piece of shit by our resident Dice, makers of badly balanced and overall shit mp shooters.[/QUOTE] Im not talking about the singleplayer. Besides, its a FPS. IMO, FPS singleplayers with such themes as these are never really worth buying. Renting? sure, if you can, or buying it at a much lower price. Fact is that these days, developers put more time into making a good multiplayer and not as much into the singleplayer, by not making it worth to replay it most of the times and just making the MP alot more satisfying. And that is where they failed. The MP came out just wrong.

[img]http://i.imgur.com/mcr82.png[/img]

I didn't think the PS3 beta was that bad. I actually enjoyed it. I still don't know if I'm going to buy it though.

For anyone worried about the $60 price tag, g2play.net is selling EA download manager keys for $40, and you get a free Medal of Honor Airborne key if you pre-order. Note: Website is currently off and on due to maintenance and such.

I just got an email from EA about doing a beta survey. it's a few pages, but mostly it's just radio buttons rating various aspects. if you got one, do it. Takes like 2 minutes and feels good to do it. I tried to give plenty of info in the comment section.

Wow, it's like they took all the frustrating parts from Call of Duty and Bad Company 2 and mashed them into one game for the multiplayer. Single Player might be awesome, but that still doesn't justify a sixty dollar price tag in my opinion. It warrants a rental.

I just went out on a limb and purchased it off steam, I've heard some really bad things about the multi but fuck it, maybe just maybe the single player will shine.

I ordered the tier 1 editiona while ago, i think that means i get to play as the beard guy

[QUOTE=camaroni;25307859]Still debating if I want to buy this game or not.[/QUOTE] $60 on this? No way. NEWSFLASH: Devs are lazy. Read this: [url]http://denkirson.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=nonsense2&action=display&thread=1704[/url] Hint: Go to page 2 for goodies. And Den Kirson does it once again, managing to find out technical aspects of the game. Go to page two to see. He found out that most guns on both sides are IDENTICAL clones of each other: AK74u = M4A1 Carbine Tariq = M9 870MCS = TOZ M249 = PKM Seriously? I mean, they are just reskins of each other. Not only that, the devs managed to make the AK47 obsolete in EVERY way possible: [release] M16A2 = 650 RPM, 25/18 damage and 20-60 meter drop-off. AK-47 = 600 RPM, 20/14 damage and 20-60 meter drop-off. G3 = 400 RPM, 25/17 damage and 10-60 meter drop-off. F2000 = 800 RPM, 17/14 damage and 15-45 meter drop-off.[/release] AK-47 is worse than M16 in every way possible. It's ONLY advantage is just a TINY 0.05 cone accuracy advantage. And when every gun in the game is pretty much recoil-less, then the accuracy advantage is redundant.

I am not going to buy a shooter for the singleplayer unless it is damn near perfect and unique. Other genres I can for-go multiplayer, but not FPS.

The only FPS single player I've ever enjoyed was the Half-Life series.

[QUOTE=Flubadoo;25315584] Read this: [url]http://denkirson.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=nonsense2&action=display&thread=1704[/url] [/QUOTE] user was banned for this post used the word proboards :')

[quote=uberslug;25301399] sp looks like it could be good, and the environments look fantastic. However, they've only shown a little gameplay and frankly, the [b]helicopter segment looked [i]retarded[/i][/b][/quote] rap moosik they have rpgs in that village let's fly closer [editline]05:48PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Flubadoo;25315584] AK-47 is worse than M16 in every way possible. It's ONLY advantage is just a TINY 0.05 cone accuracy advantage. And when every gun in the game is pretty much recoil-less, then the accuracy advantage is redundant.[/QUOTE] How does a 7.62 do LESS damage [editline]05:51PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Brt5470;25309461]I just got an email from EA about doing a beta survey. it's a few pages, but mostly it's just radio buttons rating various aspects. if you got one, do it. Takes like 2 minutes and feels good to do it. I tried to give plenty of info in the comment section.[/QUOTE] I did it as well, but it's not like they can do anything about it now. All we can do is tell them where they went wrong. And did they go wrong

[QUOTE=Jund;25318144] WTF no way, the damage numbers must be switch around How does a 7.62 do LESS damage [/QUOTE] I'm sorry, but the code CAN'T lie. Just because the bullet iss a 7.62x39 vs. .223 doesn't mean that it does more damage, [b]in the dev's[/b] mind. In BC2, the AN94 does 20 damage, its a .223 gun, but the M16, which fires the same round does only 14.3 damage. The AK47 does deal less damage, test it out yourself.

Wow Also .223 ≠ 5.56 ≠ 5.45 [editline]06:08PM[/editline] You got a link for that anyway?

So apparently if you play the SP on easy, it's 5 hours. But playing on normal and hard will take you about 10-12 hours, and on Tier 1 difficulty I imagine it takes longer. There has also been some talk about some gameplay videos from people who have gotten the game early showing the unlocks and how there aren't that many, but others have noticed that not all of the unlocks from the betas are there, and they have also found interviews with a dev where the said dev talks about unlocking more goodies after maxing out your character, which I assume is after level 15. So there could be 20-30 levels for MP. I'm getting more and more excited every day. :smile:

[QUOTE=zeldar;25324278]So apparently if you play the SP on easy, it's 5 hours. But playing on normal and hard will take you about 10-12 hours, and on Tier 1 difficulty I imagine it takes longer.[/QUOTE] Honestly that doesn't sound too great. I hate games that have long play times just because you spend half the time doing the same thing over and over. If I only die a few times in hard mode it's still going to be 5 hours. Who am I kidding that's developer laziness and it sounds terrible

There is a fine balance between being too difficult and being too easy. I find very few games to hit that sweet spot.

[QUOTE=Guniv;25324773]do you want the game to be piss easy?[/QUOTE] It's about the experience, not dying a lot.

[QUOTE=Jund;25324521]Honestly that doesn't sound too great. I hate games that have long play times just because you spend half the time doing the same thing over and over. If I only die a few times in hard mode it's still going to be 5 hours. Who am I kidding that's developer laziness and it sounds terrible[/QUOTE] 6 hours of dying. :v:

Yeah honestly. It's not like they're going to add anything new in harder difficulties, so if Tier 1 mode is like 20 hours then that's 15 hours of dying and repeating the same thing over and over.

It's an arcade mode. You try to get the best performance in every level. [editline]09:45AM[/editline] And that's a really ridiculous thing to assume.