Medal of Honor (2010) - "Call of Honor: Medal of Duty" - Games

But I like it...

How big are the multiplayer maps? Small as fuck still? Even the 'Rush' game type in the beta, while large in length, was fucking linear and cramped... It was a fancy Hallway without a roof, and a lot of invisible walls

I like the fact that they actually had the chechens as an enemy a few times, instead of just going with generic middle-easter terrists all of the time. And the chechens actually had proper gear and stuff, so that was nice too. I think it's safe to say that Medal of Honor beats MW2 in terms of authenticity.

Still doesn't fix the full auto M16A4

[QUOTE=simkas;25446963]I think it's safe to say that Medal of Honor beats MW2 in terms of authenticity.[/QUOTE] The dialog and squadmate chatter felt really natural and immersive. They didn't force military lingo on you every 3 seconds like every other modern-day military shooter

I found the ability to get infinite ammo from my allies really stupid. What is the point of even having an ammo count if I just get more whenever? Just like all pistols are infinite.

Just completed it. Amazing game.

[QUOTE=Jund;25445474][sp]I think it was the beginning, when the OPFOR was waiting to ambush Taric.[/sp] [/QUOTE] Wow, I never thought about it that way. [QUOTE=LiquiD;25446469]But I like it...[/QUOTE] You and me both.

[QUOTE=Nohj;25447072]I found the ability to get infinite ammo from my allies really stupid. What is the point of even having an ammo count if I just get more whenever? Just like all pistols are infinite.[/QUOTE] Well I guess it's so you don't have to ditch your gun in the middle of a firefight. I personally find it annoying to have to drop my tactic00l M4 for an AK in singleplayer mode. [editline]16th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=zeldar;25447434]Wow, I never thought about it that way.[/QUOTE] Well, it makes most sense to me that way.

If they do make a sequel, I hope they try being more original and don't use Dice for the multiplayer, Dice is good at their franchises, it feels as if EA just forced them to make the multiplayer with little time to make it ambitious.

i don't see the bitching about the multiplayer, its actually pretty fun.

[QUOTE=Nohj;25447072]I found the ability to get infinite ammo from my allies really stupid. What is the point of even having an ammo count if I just get more whenever? Just like all pistols are infinite.[/QUOTE] I liked though, that they only gave you ammo if they had that kindof gun. Otherwise they said something like "Different weapons!" or so. [sp]Also, that general is a fucking douchebag.[/sp]

[QUOTE=Glent;25448163]I liked though, that they only gave you ammo if they had that kindof gun. Otherwise they said something like "Different weapons!" or so. [sp]Also, that general is a fucking douchebag.[/sp][/QUOTE] Level where you were defending the hut. I have a lmg. He has an assault rifle. Ammo! Here take some of mine. Hands me one mag of assault rifle ammo. 194/1000 ammo for lmg now.

[QUOTE=Nohj;25448697]Level where you were defending the hut. I have a lmg. He has an assault rifle. Ammo! Here take some of mine. Hands me one mag of assault rifle ammo. 194/1000 ammo for lmg now.[/QUOTE] Well, those weapons use the same kindof ammo, so it sortof makes sense, but not too much.

[QUOTE=Nohj;25448697]Level where you were defending the hut. I have a lmg. He has an assault rifle. Ammo! Here take some of mine. Hands me one mag of assault rifle ammo. 194/1000 ammo for lmg now.[/QUOTE] Better than having to use a different weapon for the rest of the mission

[QUOTE=Glent;25449765]Well, those weapons use the same kindof ammo, so it sortof makes sense, but not too much.[/QUOTE] Loading a magazine a bullet at a time is a pain in the ass, even with speedloaders

I'm STILL debating whether or not I should shell out for this one. I never preordered, so I was sort of buttfucked when launch day came around, and I lost enthusiasm after that. Since some of the shit I read here I really think I should just wait for Black Ops.

[QUOTE=Derpmeifter;25451215]I'm STILL debating whether or not I should shell out for this one. I never preordered, so I was sort of buttfucked when launch day came around, and I lost enthusiasm after that. Since some of the shit I read here I really think I should just wait for Black Ops.[/QUOTE] If you want a great singleplayer experience get this, if you want fun MP either wait for 50 patches from Dice (doubt they'll even lift a finger trying to patch this game) or get blackops.

One of the DICE devs mentioned on his Twitter that there was another patch coming soon that would fix issues with snipers and et cetera. I hope the postlaunch DLC includes the exclusive weapons. They're all pretty awesome. They would also increase the longevity of MP with more weapons to unlock and such.

[QUOTE=Legend286;25452072]If you want a great singleplayer experience get this, if you want fun MP either wait for 50 patches from Dice (doubt they'll even lift a finger trying to patch this game) or get blackops.[/QUOTE] Well actually, I already have my preorder down from blackops, but since I cancelled one of my Reach preorders (somehow gamestop tried to make me buy two copies, I called bullshit 2 days before launch) I've been considering spending that money on another game anyway. I'll just snag a friends copy, give that a whirl, then decide. And then buy the game anyway because since when was I smart with my vidyagame money?

is the game only about OEF?

Medal of Honor is so much better than Modern Warfare 2. I hope Black Ops is better though, simply because I'm going to buy it too.

[QUOTE=triorio;25445695]Awesome campaign but short. The music is fucking brilliant. [sp]when you were defending the hut there was this sad music and I really felt like I was going to die fighting and holding on for as long as I could, but then I heard apaches and this badass music gets up and I'm like yeaaah. [/sp][/QUOTE] I loved that mission. I actually [sp] felt sad when they all came to terms with the fact that they were going to die and called off backup. [/sp]

[QUOTE=HolyCrusade;25455046]I loved that mission. I actually [sp] felt sad when they all came to terms with the fact that they were going to die and called off backup. [/sp][/QUOTE] [sp]I agree, it was really sad when it seemed all was lost. At least the way they where saved was somewhat realistic, instead of something stupid like an EMP going off.[/sp]

[QUOTE=Derpmeifter;25451215]I'm STILL debating whether or not I should shell out for this one. I never preordered, so I was sort of buttfucked when launch day came around, and I lost enthusiasm after that. Since some of the shit I read here I really think I should just wait for Black Ops.[/QUOTE] Don't bother if you want a game you can play for a few days. It's easy to overestimate the length and accidentally beat the game.

[QUOTE=TheTalon;25446605]How big are the multiplayer maps? Small as fuck still? Even the 'Rush' game type in the beta, while large in length, was fucking linear and cramped... It was a fancy Hallway without a roof, and a lot of invisible walls[/QUOTE] The fact that the maps are smaller and more linear than in BC2 of even BF2 keeps the action fast phased. In BF2 you have to travel miles just to get sniped or killed by a jet.

Multiplayer is fun when you are not getting spawn camped by snipers.

I lova playing as assault. Snipers are so annoying in any game.

[QUOTE=dark_console2;25458146]Multiplayer is fun when you are not getting spawn camped by snipers.[/QUOTE] I hate when that happens. You're going down a hill to defuse an objective and a million snipers open fire on you.

Rented it on the Xbox, it was worth it for the singleplayer, I jumped into the multiplayer for a few minutes but it seemed really shit so I stopped. $10 bucks for five hours of SP seemed reasonable, though I would be really fucking mad If I had shelled out $60 for the PC version.