[QUOTE=Sweet_Water;29840293]Either that or you have the patience of a 2nd grader and you're bored easily, that would be my guess if you like games such as CoD, which are action packed for people with easily amused minds.
[/QUOTE]
Since when was Half Life 1 an intellectual journey through the depths of the human psyche? Last time I played (last month) it was typical corridor shooter with some cool parts that were amazing for it's time.
[QUOTE=koeniginator;29848864]Who says?
Source?[/QUOTE]
says his jam packed recent work schedule.
Kung fu panda 2
Sherlock Holmes 2
Crysis 2
Pirates : on stranger tides
Rango
Currently: the Dark Knight rises.
He's not announced to work on MW3 and he probably isn't since Activision would flaunt him if they got him.
[QUOTE=stepat201;29830711]The presentation is quite awful actually. The game presents it's entire story to you in loading screens that essentially boil down to a series of fuzzy images that last no more than half a second before cutting to the next one. It's a pretty unpleasant experience.[/QUOTE]
you kidding
Washington DC was possibly one of the greatest visual experiences i've seen in a game
[img]http://cloud.2404.org/review-screens/mw2/3.jpg[/img]
[img]http://marcoponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-10-at-1.14.17-AM.png[/img]
[editline]16th May 2011[/editline]
infact every part where you played rangers was amazing
[QUOTE=Fire Kracker;29855603]you kidding
Washington DC was possibly one of the greatest visual experiences i've seen in a game
[img_thumb]http://cloud.2404.org/review-screens/mw2/3.jpg[/img_thumb]
[img_thumb]http://marcoponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-10-at-1.14.17-AM.png[/img_thumb]
[editline]16th May 2011[/editline]
infact every part where you played rangers was amazing[/QUOTE]
I will admit, there were a lot of amazing parts of the campaign, but overall, it could have been pulled off better. They could have made it longer (we all know about that and I even feel annoyed just typing it), they could have made the story better, and they could have tried to improve on how the drama works.
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;29855691]*insert generic comment on how CoD is boring and bashing people who play it*[/QUOTE]
No, it's now: *insert generic comment on how people who dislike COD are jumping on the bandwagon*
*insert generic comment on how CoD is boring and bashing people who play it*
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;29855678]I will admit, there were a lot of amazing parts of the campaign, but overall, it could have been pulled off better. They could have made it longer (we all know about that and I even feel annoyed just typing it), they could have made the story better, and they could have tried to improve on how the drama works.
No, it's now: *insert generic comment on how people who dislike COD are jumping on the bandwagon*[/QUOTE]
I was actually replaying the campaign the other day and I found several hours had passed, when I thought it had been a bit more than half an hour.
I think it actually has something to do with how fast-paced it is, it just feels like you beat the game in a couple of hours when it actually took a lot longer.
The game "feels" short
ITT: "YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT I LIKE! FUCK GOD DAMN IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT! GET THE FUCK OUT!
Also, guys? How can you assume this is a bad game when absolutely no gameplay has been released? PLUS, THE GAME ISN'T EVEN DONE YET. Do you guys not realize that this is not the final set up?
if you complain about a game ' being the same every time '.
put yourself in a developers shoes.
if you take too long to make a game & make it a little different, the world gets pissed at you for taking too long.
if you try to do it quickly, manage to pull off a good job, people yell at you & say its the same / the game was rushed.
& who cares if someone doesnt like it. who cares if they bandwagon. why does it bother you.
if they like the game, good for them
if they dont, good for them.
[QUOTE=TheNuB;29856120]if you complain about a game ' being the same every time '.
put yourself in a developers shoes.
if you take too long to make a game & make it a little different, the world gets pissed at you for taking too long.
if you try to do it quickly, manage to pull off a good job, people yell at you & say its the same / the game was rushed.
& who cares if someone doesnt like it. who cares if they bandwagon. why does it bother you.
if they like the game, good for them
if they dont, good for them.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but it gets REALLY annoying when you are looking more info on CoD but instead you find 1 or 2 posts about the game and the rest are just people bashing it.
Let's hope campaign feels longer in MW3.
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;29856167]Yeah, but it gets REALLY annoying when you are looking more info on CoD but instead you find 1 or 2 posts about the game and the rest are just people bashing it.[/QUOTE]
i know, i can understand that.
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;29856167]Yeah, but it gets REALLY annoying when you are looking more info on CoD but instead you find 1 or 2 posts about the game and the rest are just people bashing it.[/QUOTE]
Because theres nothing about the game known yet. Except everything in the OP. The game is going too be the same shit as MW2, fuck, it even rehashed the same trailer scheme from MW2. "GREEN SHIT....MINOR DETAILS......GUY SPEAKING RUSSIAN...."
[QUOTE=TheNuB;29856120]if you complain about a game ' being the same every time '.
put yourself in a developers shoes.
if you take too long to make a game & make it a little different, the world gets pissed at you for taking too long.
if you try to do it quickly, manage to pull off a good job, people yell at you & say its the same / the game was rushed.
& who cares if someone doesnt like it. who cares if they bandwagon. why does it bother you.
if they like the game, good for them
if they dont, good for them.[/QUOTE]
When you take too long people get pissed and still buy your games because you release something quality and unique.
When you pump out games you release a quality game over and over and no one knows why people still buy them.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;29856245]Because theres nothing about the game known yet. Except everything in the OP. The game is going too be the same shit as MW2, fuck, it even rehashed the same trailer scheme from MW2. "GREEN SHIT....MINOR DETAILS......GUY SPEAKING RUSSIAN...."[/QUOTE]
You have a good point. But we will fully know until gameplay has been released.
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;29856167]Yeah, but it gets REALLY annoying when you are looking more info on CoD but instead you find 1 or 2 posts about the game and the rest are just people bashing it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;29856060]ITT: "YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT I LIKE! FUCK GOD DAMN IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT! GET THE FUCK OUT!
Also, guys? How can you assume this is a bad game when absolutely no gameplay has been released? PLUS, THE GAME ISN'T EVEN DONE YET. Do you guys not realize that this is not the final set up?[/QUOTE]
Oh my god can you even read?
The series has been basically the same since COD4. The only differences and new additions to the series are the settings of each game and the zombie and spec ops minigames.
Why should we expect something new and creative after a horrendous wave of copying.
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;29856167]Yeah, but it gets REALLY annoying when you are looking more info on CoD but instead you find 1 or 2 posts about the game and the rest are just people bashing it.[/QUOTE]
Bullshit. This entire thread has been people sucking Sledgehammer's balls just because they're a different company.
[editline]15th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=TheNuB;29856120]if you complain about a game ' being the same every time '.
put yourself in a developers shoes.
if you take too long to make a game & make it a little different, the world gets pissed at you for taking too long.
if you try to do it quickly, manage to pull off a good job, people yell at you & say its the same / the game was rushed.
& who cares if someone doesnt like it. who cares if they bandwagon. why does it bother you.
if they like the game, good for them
if they dont, good for them.[/QUOTE]
OH MY FUCKING GOD FOR THE LAST TIME IT'S NOT A FUCKING BANDWAGON.
YOU GUYS ARE SO FUCKING ANNOYING.
SEE WHAT YOU DID? NOW I CAN'T STOP TYPING IN CAPS.
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;29856060]ITT: "YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT I LIKE! FUCK GOD DAMN IT YOU PIECE OF SHIT! GET THE FUCK OUT!
Also, guys? How can you assume this is a bad game when absolutely no gameplay has been released? PLUS, THE GAME ISN'T EVEN DONE YET. Do you guys not realize that this is not the final set up?[/QUOTE]
Well I think we can assume it'll be the same game with some new guns and maps like always which is a good enough reason not to pay out $60 more for some people
Also there's that MW2 was the worst of the bunch and had the most unbalanced and exploitable perks I've seen
What if MW3 was balanced?
[editline]15th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;29856431]Oh my god can you even read?
The series has been basically the same since COD4. The only differences and new additions to the series are the settings of each game and the zombie and spec ops minigames.
Why should we expect something new and creative after a horrendous wave of copying.
Bullshit. This entire thread has been people sucking Sledgehammer's balls just because they're a different company.
[editline]15th May 2011[/editline]
OH MY FUCKING GOD FOR THE LAST TIME IT'S NOT A FUCKING BANDWAGON.
YOU GUYS ARE SO FUCKING ANNOYING.
SEE WHAT YOU DID? NOW I CAN'T STOP TYPING IN CAPS.[/QUOTE]
Jesus Christ, we get it, it's not even funny anymore... :colbert:
I was really expecting the siege of Moscow but I guess all the different locations are cool too.
[QUOTE=sa2fan;29856580]What if MW3 was balanced?
[editline]15th May 2011[/editline]
Jesus Christ, we get it, it's not even funny anymore... :colbert:[/QUOTE]
If MW3 doesn't have the horrible balancing issues of MW2 I might buy it since I skipped Black Ops and paying $60 every couple of years for essentially the same game is better than doing it every year.
[QUOTE=Smooth Jazz;29856664]I was really expecting the siege of Moscow but I guess all the different locations are cool too.[/QUOTE]
[sp]They imply Russia gets invaded in a counter-attack since Frost (A Delta Force character) is leading his squad in the Kremlin to attack Makarov, which would imply they'd found a way to get a heavily armed US assault force into the capital of Russia.
Then there's the issue that Makarov escapes to Dubai instead of another city in Russia, which further implies he has nowhere else to run.[/sp]
[sp]Well I know Makarov dies in Dubai, but what the heck... Still want to find out how it plays![/sp]
I really need to find a 10th prestige lobby for MW2.
Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Thread : [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1071911-Battlefield-3-v2-Now-with-900-more-Battlefields[/url]
Lacking prepubescent whining shitbags who foolishly buy the same, basic game year after year.
Battlefield 3!
Battlfi- Actually no. Go buy the same game as black ops. I don't care :smug:
[QUOTE=DeathFrogg;29859009]Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Thread : [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1071911-Battlefield-3-v2-Now-with-900-more-Battlefields[/url]
Lacking prepubescent whining shitbags who foolishly buy the same, basic game year after year.
Battlefield 3!
Battlfi- Actually no. Go buy the same game as black ops. I don't care :smug:[/QUOTE]
inb4 get out.
[QUOTE=Highwind017;29814461][img_thumb]http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2011/05/medium__model_1887_iw5.jpg[/img_thumb]
It has that Mass-Produced look...
And by the looks of it, Shotguns are secondarys... Bugger.
(Shotguns arnt supposed to be Secondarys, I perfer having a pistol with a shotgun! D:)[/QUOTE]
Call of duty: Turning 200 year old shotguns into tactic00l pieces of shit since 2009
[QUOTE=DeathFrogg;29859009]Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Thread : [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1071911-Battlefield-3-v2-Now-with-900-more-Battlefields[/url]
Lacking prepubescent whining shitbags who foolishly buy the same, basic game year after year.
Battlefield 3!
Battlfi- Actually no. Go buy the same game as black ops. I don't care :smug:[/QUOTE]
If everyone in BF3 acts like you then how about no.
[QUOTE=DeathFrogg;29859009]Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Thread : [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1071911-Battlefield-3-v2-Now-with-900-more-Battlefields[/url]
Lacking prepubescent whining shitbags who foolishly buy the same, basic game year after year.
Battlefield 3!
Battlfi- Actually no. Go buy the same game as black ops. I don't care :smug:[/QUOTE]
I really like Call of Duty, and I'm always satisfied with my purchase, every year. Well, satisfied enough that I don't have to go into the Battlefield thread and claim my game is better.
[QUOTE=DeathFrogg;29859009]Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Battlefield 3!
Thread : [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1071911-Battlefield-3-v2-Now-with-900-more-Battlefields[/url]
Lacking prepubescent whining shitbags who foolishly buy the same, basic game year after year.
Battlefield 3!
Battlfi- Actually no. Go buy the same game as black ops. I don't care :smug:[/QUOTE]
Your attitude here is no different than the "prepubescent whining shitbags who foolishly buy the same, basic game year after year."
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
