It's hard to express in words how much I loathe the popularity of games like this. They never innovate, they never contribute anything to the industry, and there's a thousand better gameplay experiences out there. Yet people keep playing it - the power of marketing at work.
[QUOTE=koeniginator;29799053]Yes, they can.
Expect something similar to WaW's vehicles[/QUOTE]
so they're just now doing what battlefield did in like 2002
REVOLUTIONARY AND INNOVATIVE
MOST ORIGINAL GAME 2011
[QUOTE=koeniginator;29799053]Yes, they can.
Expect something similar to WaW's vehicles[/QUOTE]
Funny how that dick that was posting earlier with the big red title said BF3 looks like a CoD clone, yet mw3 is having destructable environments and vehicles....
Well, from the info, it seems like at least the environments will be a lot more varied and the fact that we'll be playing as a lot more different kinds of soldiers suggests that the campaign should be longer and more varied. The weapons and character models still look like the same tacticool stuff and the graphics don't look like they changed a bit. We'll just have to wait till we see some gameplay and more multiplayer info before we can really know if it'll still be the same stuff.
[QUOTE=koeniginator;29799053]Yes, they can.
Expect something similar to WaW's vehicles[/QUOTE]
god dammit
considering the game is more than likely going to be rehashed gameplay I don't want it
but if those vehicles can be piloted/driven, I kinda want it now
[QUOTE=Melon_Mapper;29799093]Funny how that dick that was posting earlier with the big red title said BF3 looks like a CoD clone, yet mw3 is having destructable environments and vehicles....[/QUOTE]
691### is a trolling dumbass, if you haven't noticed. I'm still wondering how he hasn't gotten perma'd after so much trolling.
[editline]13th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=simkas;29799112]Well, from the info, it seems like at least the environments will be a lot more varied and the fact that we'll be playing as a lot more different kinds of soldiers suggests that the campaign should be longer and more varied. The weapons and character models still look like the same tacticool stuff and the graphics don't look like they changed a bit. We'll just have to wait till we see some gameplay and more multiplayer info before we can really know if it'll still be the same stuff.[/QUOTE]
I'm betting :10bux: that 80% of the playable characters are going to be killed by 4/5ths of the game.
It sounds like the story is gonna be epic and action packed.
Stupid but entertaining.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;29799083]so they're just now doing what battlefield did in like 2002
REVOLUTIONARY AND INNOVATIVE
MOST ORIGINAL GAME 2011[/QUOTE]
...Or what Halo did in 2001.
[QUOTE=Funky Pickle;29799185]...Or what Halo did in 2001.[/QUOTE]
.... Or what codename eagle did in 1999.
[QUOTE=Randdalf;29799061]It's hard to express in words how much I loathe the popularity of games like this. They never innovate, they never contribute anything to the industry, and there's a thousand better gameplay experiences out there. Yet people keep playing it - the power of marketing at work.[/QUOTE]
Better gameplay experiences are subjective. And being innovative doesn't always lead to industry contributions or solid games. Again I have to bring up what I mentioned earlier: You are an Acitivision executive overseeing the CoD titles. You watch as, year after year for the last 8 years, each Call of Duty game, largely unchanged, manages to sell record amounts of units, with the last two titles successfully breaking entertainment records as a whole. Clearly the formula is working. Why innovate?
I'll probably get this, but this is pretty ridiculous.
Isn't this like Call of Duty 8: Modern Warfare 3?
I have the most distinct feeling, that the 'more varied environments' instead of just American or Russian areas is an attempt to combat Battlefield 3's claims of the same thing. But this is just speculation.
I've lost interest in the series since MW2 wasn't that great in my opinion, and Black Ops for the PC was like the greatest grudge match Activision's given us. But i'll probably be a dumbass and buy this anyway. At least the MP5's back, though.
[QUOTE=God of Ashes;29799249]I'll probably get this, but this is pretty ridiculous.
Isn't this like Call of Duty 8: Modern Warfare 3?[/QUOTE]
They stopped putting numbers on them starting with world at war
[QUOTE=RikohZX;29799269] At least the MP5's back, though.[/QUOTE]
Fucking yes, haven't seen an honest to goodness real MP5 in new games for awhile.
[QUOTE=BrQ;29798868]so you say you thought the game would be unplayable when you first heard about it, sounds like blind hate to me[/QUOTE]
No, I said It might even be playable when I first heard about it.
But after the disappointments they made, what can one expect?
[QUOTE=Melon_Mapper;29799240].... Or what codename eagle did in 1999.[/QUOTE]
... Or what Shadow Warrior did in 1997
I think EA/DICE are being clever in how they're marketing Battlefield 3. They haven't shown anything on multiplayer yet apart from some vague details. So when MW3 reveals its multiplayer in all its glory (spoilers [spoiler]it's the same as the last 4[/spoiler]), EA then soon after comes in with 32-player, vehicles, fully destructable environments, and that's only on the consoles.
Buuuuuttttt, I don't think anything will change on the sales front unfortunately.
[QUOTE=Randdalf;29799365]I think EA/DICE are being clever in how they're marketing Battlefield 3. They haven't shown anything on multiplayer yet apart from some vague details. So when MW3 reveals its multiplayer in all its glory (spoilers [spoiler]it's the same as the last 4[/spoiler]), EA then soon after comes in with 32-player, vehicles, fully destructable environments, and that's only on the consoles.
Buuuuuttttt, I don't think anything will change on the sales front unfortunately.[/QUOTE]
It's a leak, they didn't reveal it all on purpose
[QUOTE=koeniginator;29799363]... Or what Shadow Warrior did in 1997[/QUOTE]
Well I can say, the battlefield series most likely did it right, especially with teamwork involved and vehicles.
[QUOTE=Randdalf;29799365]EA then soon after comes in with 32-player, vehicles, fully destructable environments, and that's only on the consoles.
Buuuuuttttt, I don't think anything will change on the sales front unfortunately.[/QUOTE]
Actually it is 24 players on consoles, which is a step up from CoD, and I am sure all those people who buy new shooters based on which game has the higher player cap will be all over that. Vehicles? Done in other games, not particularly cool anymore, especially since MW3 might have them.
And hehu rumor has it MW3 will feature some sort of environmental destruction.
I won't buy it, but my dad probably will. If he doesn't I'll just rent it.
Wasted 60 dollars on black ops, going to buy a real game instead.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;29799445]Actually it is 24 players on consoles, which is a step up from CoD, and I am sure all those people who buy new shooters based on which game has the higher player cap will be all over that. Vehicles? Done in other games, not particularly cool anymore, especially since MW3 might have them.
And hehu rumor has it MW3 will feature some sort of environmental destruction.[/QUOTE]
Rumor has it, it'll be the exact same game with a little bit of copying what DICE has done to try and get more sales, because as dumb as they are, even CoD players aren't going to continue buying the same fucking thing year after year
[QUOTE=proch;29799315]No, I said It might even be playable [/QUOTE]
so you thought it was not playable, but that there was a possibility that it was playable
Looks like shit right now, and the due date won't fix the shitty looking stuff.
It sounds like there won't be any development with the new characters with how much the story seems to fly around.
Not like there ever was any development beforehand.
So since [sp]you don't play as Roach, I wonder if this means they'll pull a Soap and you can see him[/sp]
Not gonna buy. Vehicles? Oh really? Still not.
COD just keeps getting worse as long as Activision knows they'll make a huge wad of cash even if their game sucks.
What's new about this one?
[QUOTE=Tuskin;29799838]So since [sp]you don't play as Roach, I wonder if this means they'll pull a Soap and you can see him[/sp][/QUOTE]roach got set on fire with ghost
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
