World of Tanks - SIEMA PL? - Games

Was the assault gun tree confirmed? Like officially?

The German Assault guns branch is going to be so much fun. It will be basically a whole branch worth of SU-152s. [editline]12th August 2012[/editline] Yep. That's where Sturmtiger and Bar went.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;37197723]Was the assault gun tree confirmed? Like officially?[/QUOTE] Confirmed by our beloved SerB himself.

Hm. Is the Type 62 any good? Seen quite a few today and they haven't really done jack shit so I'm wondering if the problem exists between the chair and keyboard, or the tank is just bad

here [quote]From an interview with SerB on Overlord's blog: "Q: Can you tell me when will you add Brummbär and Sturmtiger in the game and in which line you will put those tanks? A: We have decided to form a separate subline of assault guns with these vehicles. This subline is not finished yet, as soon it is, we will announce it to players." [/quote] [editline]12th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Saza;37197743]Hm. Is the Type 62 any good? Seen quite a few today and they haven't really done jack shit so I'm wondering if the problem exists between the chair and keyboard, or the tank is just bad[/QUOTE] It's slightly gimped Chaffee with better matchmaking and which actually makes money. It's bloody brilliant.

Sounds pretty good.

So many nice things they are doing all the sudden. It has to be some sort of conspiracy.

Bought back my Hetzer because of MM 2.0. Got ace tanker + top gun (7 kills) in my second match with it (not counting the old battles).

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37197600]Good god excuse me if I am late but 15cm Hetzer [img]http://ww2drawings.jexiste.fr/Images/1-Vehicles/05-Assault-Guns/Auf-Panzer38(t)/15cmsIG33-auf-Hetzer/p1.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] will not be surprised if that's in the Assault Gun Tree. it's a fucking Bison gun stuffed in a Hetzer. it fits it's job description perfectly.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;37197802]So many nice things they are doing all the sudden. It has to be some sort of conspiracy.[/QUOTE] 1) they are growing more and more - more manpowered, regardless how mismanaged and lazy still leads to more development. 2) they realize (and officially recognize) the concurrency in MWO - they finally have to start fighting for their money.

[QUOTE=Saza;37197743]Hm. Is the Type 62 any good? Seen quite a few today and they haven't really done jack shit so I'm wondering if the problem exists between the chair and keyboard, or the tank is just bad[/QUOTE] Most people play light tanks like complete dumbasses. The tank is good.

[QUOTE=Saza;37197743]Hm. Is the Type 62 any good? Seen quite a few today and they haven't really done jack shit so I'm wondering if the problem exists between the chair and keyboard, or the tank is just bad[/QUOTE] It's a difficult tank to play, so most people are crying on the forums about wanting their money back or whatever. It's a little sluggish so it's hella easy to get killed if you try and drive around in sight of enemies. I wish it made more credits for the cost but it's a guaranteed paycheck so whatever. My PB is 54k creds, but most games around 30k.

[QUOTE=cccino;37197856]It's a difficult tank to play, so most people are crying on the forums about wanting their money back or whatever. It's a little sluggish so it's hella easy to get killed if you try and drive around in sight of enemies. I wish it made more credits for the cost but it's a guaranteed paycheck so whatever. My PB is 54k creds, but most games around 30k.[/QUOTE] On or off prem?

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37197862]On or off prem?[/QUOTE] On prem.

[QUOTE=Calkkuna;37197392]Does anyone know a crosshair mod that would just add a reaload time indicator with seconds next to the normal game crosshair? The Jimbo's or whatever is too sci-fi for my tastes.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.curse.com/wot-mods/worldoftanks/vanilla-reticle-reload-timer-and[/url] Also another handy little mod: [url]http://www.curse.com/wot-mods/worldoftanks/accurate-damage-indicator[/url]

Also everyone keeps calling it T-62 which bugs the everliving shit outa me. [editline].[/editline] Dat automerge.

[QUOTE=cccino;37197856]It's a difficult tank to play, so most people are crying on the forums about wanting their money back or whatever. It's a little sluggish so it's hella easy to get killed if you try and drive around in sight of enemies. I wish it made more credits for the cost but it's a guaranteed paycheck so whatever. My PB is 54k creds, but most games around 30k.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Orkel;37197855]Most people play light tanks like complete dumbasses. The tank is good.[/QUOTE] I expected to hear that it'd be kinda hard to play. I'm thinking of maybe picking it up. I have a Type 59 already, so it isn't really an issue if it "only" makes 30k a game.

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37197849] 2) they realize (and officially recognize) the concurrency in MWO - they finally have to start fighting for their money.[/QUOTE] another thing that doesn't surprise me as MWO straight up photocopies WoT's general underlying Structure and metagame concepts.

[QUOTE=Orkel;37197822]Bought back my Hetzer because of MM 2.0. Got ace tanker + top gun (7 kills) in my second match with it (not counting the old battles).[/QUOTE] 105 i take it?

I want this tank [IMG]http://ww2drawings.jexiste.fr/Images/1-Vehicles/03-Heavy_Tanks/KV-1(75mmKwK-L48)/p2.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Bowser_nl;37198057]105 i take it?[/QUOTE] Yea. Got another top gun in my 3rd match.

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37197549]I am pretty sure Dicker Max is related to Hummel. [IMG]http://ww2drawings.jexiste.fr/Images/1-Vehicles/04-Tank_Destroyers/Dickermax/p1.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://ww2drawings.jexiste.fr/Images/1-Vehicles/06-Armored_Artillery/Auf-Panzer4/Hummel/p1.jpg[/IMG] They are both derivates of PzIV chassis.[/QUOTE] But the Dicker Max isn't a variation of the hummel, it is the Dicker Max. I know they both use the same chassis but they are both still a diffrent tank.

Wargaming has to add the E Series jagdpanzer there is like 3-5 of them.

[QUOTE=C0MMUNIZT;37198294]But the Dicker Max isn't a variation of the hummel, it is the Dicker Max. I know they both use the same chassis but they are both still a diffrent tank.[/QUOTE] I am saying they are both variation of the PanzerIV chassis.

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37198630]I am saying they are both variation of the PanzerIV chassis.[/QUOTE] well, the Hummel and Nashorn use the III/IV chassis. Dmax is just a Panzer IV.

[t]http://i.imgur.com/w39OI.jpg[/t] rip everything on the enemy team

[QUOTE=goon165;37197834]will not be surprised if that's in the Assault Gun Tree. it's a fucking Bison gun stuffed in a Hetzer. it fits it's job description perfectly.[/QUOTE] If I remember right it's open top so it doesn't really fit the assault gun thing. But then again, they put the Object 263 as the SU-122-54's child so...

I posted it before, and I'll post it again. [t]http://ww2drawings.jexiste.fr/Images/1-Vehicles/05-Assault-Guns/Baer/p1.jpg[/t] 350.5mm I know the Sturmtiger is 380mm, but this might actually hit something. :v:

[img]http://mirtankov.net/images/stories/skins/2012/Aug/4aug/shot_968.jpg[/img] jesus christ

Ok for the life of me I cannot penetrate shit with a T-28, 76mm, 57mm, it doesn't matter nothing is getting through at any angle anywhere. What is going on.