cccino, is that your bumpersticker in the contest?
If so imma go vote for it.
[QUOTE=O'Neil;37255226]
Would be an interesting premium seeing the Americans are getting the Panther-M10 (Panther disguised as an M10)
[IMG]http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/760/m10panther3.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
[quote]SerB/Wargaming: Because this tank was disguised as an M10, the turret cover will not act as spaced armor.[/quote]
That is like the first thing that came into my mind when I searched about the tank awhile back. It is probably because of all the bad decisions they have made overall that makes me think this way.
[IMG]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5793726/why.png[/IMG]
What the heck, seriously.
[editline]16th August 2012[/editline]
[url]http://worldoftanks.eu/community/accounts/501036226-Elstoffenstein/[/url]
why.
[QUOTE=Zakhodit;37259921]cccino, is that your bumpersticker in the contest?
If so imma go vote for it.[/QUOTE]
Yup, ducks is mine.
Voted!
We got fucked up in the tournament because E4s and M48s are the most overpowered pieces of shit since the atomic bomb.
I did 100 damage to a Batchat and nearly killed the Foch155 in the Bt-7 :v:
Have you guys seen this?
[url]http://worldoftanks.com/community/accounts/1001355528-hollie/[/url]
bitch has 4.4k battles in her loltraktor, and even has a fucking clan with 90 people dedicated to ltraktors.
What the shit
She still sucks with it.
M8A1 is dominate. T4 match. Four kills, 3 damages for good amounts, four spots. I probably killed everything I spotted. 775 xp doubled minus 16 for ff. I nearly got steel wall. Too many shots hit my mantlet probably.
[editline]15th August 2012[/editline]
Efficiency rating
604.17
Sad to not be in the bottom 10% anymore.
It's kind of sad that tier 2 matchmaking got reduced to rubble
T2 meds should not play against hetzers what the fuck
Why can't they have matchmaking where only two tiers are in, instead of having a Sherman E2 brawl against a fucking E-75
[QUOTE=fishyfish777;37263292]It's kind of sad that tier 2 matchmaking got reduced to rubble
T2 meds should not play against hetzers what the fuck[/QUOTE]
RIP T2 LT
What is a good number for efficiency ratings to be considered good at certain tank?
[QUOTE=Super2Donny;37264585]What is a good number for efficiency ratings to be considered good at certain tank?[/QUOTE]
At a certain tank? Varies wildly. Tanks I consider myself good with have ~1300-1500 efficiency. It's all the little shitty tanks that you have to grit your teeth through or just give up on entirely that pull everyones' (well, not [I]everyones'[/I]) global efficiencies down.
I have gotten up to the KV-1 in the USSR tank tree, I am wondering
which tank I should go for next
how I should get there
Should I research other stuff in the KV-1 tree and use it as my money maker in the long run
or should I just go straight for the next tank in the tree?
[QUOTE=Skwee;37264676]I have gotten up to the KV-1 in the USSR tank tree, I am wondering
which tank I should go for next
how I should get there
Should I research other stuff in the KV-1 tree and use it as my money maker in the long run
or should I just go straight for the next tank in the tree?[/QUOTE]
Go down the IS-7 tree
IS-7 line is more forgiving, but the IX literally gains no armor.
IS-4 line is difficult, expensive and chunky - but the ST-I is a blast.
[QUOTE=Doom14;37264799]IS-7 line is more forgiving, but the IX literally gains no armor.
IS-4 line is difficult, expensive and chunky - but the ST-I is a blast.[/QUOTE]
Well, it's basically the same thing in the American tree. The M103 feels like a downgrade in armor compared to the T32.
My only problem with the IS-4 line is the KV-4, if it still had its 50 kph top speed (along with those delicious armor buffs) it'd be a blast. Right now it's a slower KV-5 without the R2D2 and a better gun, except the frontal armor doesn't ding anything past T7. Oh and maybe the KV-3's insane mobility with the 750 HP engine.
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37264866]frontal armor doesn't ding anything past T7.[/QUOTE]
How do you think I feel in my E-100 when T7s pen me even when angled?
Anyone have any positive things to say for American TD's? I'm on my way for the T28.
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37264890]How do you think I feel in my E-100 when T7s pen me even when angled?[/QUOTE]
I still believe the E-100 should get its "historical" lower hull (200mm or something?). It's supposed to be a slightly more versatile steel wall than the Maus, right now it's a 15cm gun mounted on a swiss cheese chassis.
I also believe the Maus should be [B]fucking impenetrable[/B] as long as you're facing it, just how it was meant. You should have to flank the slow motherfucker in order to penetrate it, not just shoot it until it blows up because of its horrendously high HP.
The AMX 50B should also get its historical gun depression with the Tourelle D (and they should fix the model, it's far from perfect).
They should also remove the BatChat's pivot turning ability in exchange for the 7.4 mobility.
[QUOTE=CabooseRvB;37264893]Anyone have any positive things to say for American TD's? I'm on my way for the T28.[/QUOTE]
The T95 is the best defense tank I have ever seen. When I see one up ahead, I tend to turn right the fuck around and find another way.
[QUOTE=Birdman101;37264958]The T95 is the best defense tank I have ever seen. When I see one up ahead, I tend to turn right the fuck around and find another way.[/QUOTE]
The same thing happens to me when I see a god damn T110E4.
Everybody on the test server kept screaming about how fucking OP it was but WG doesn't give a damn.
You can't really flank it since it turns really fucking fast with the turret, you can't reliably penetrate it from the front since it's basically an uparmored T110E5 (and no, the tumor is NOT a weakspot) and the gun really fucking hurts.
Also 50B (might take a while to load, it's still a 1 MB 10595 x 6404 PNG :v:)
[T]http://niggaupload.com/images/78sBM.png[/T]
See that Wargaming? -8/+14. Not -6/+12.
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37265030]The same thing happens to me when I see a god damn T110E4.
Everybody on the test server kept screaming about how fucking OP it was but WG doesn't give a damn.
You can't really flank it since it turns really fucking fast with the turret, you can't reliably penetrate it from the front since it's basically an uparmored T110E5 (and no, the tumor is NOT a weakspot) and the gun really fucking hurts.
Also 50B (might take a while to load, it's still a 1 MB 10595 x 6404 PNG :v:)
[T]http://niggaupload.com/images/78sBM.png[/T]
See that Wargaming? -8/+14. Not -6/+12.[/QUOTE]
The tumor can be penetrated by E-100s gun.
I penetrated it twice while facehugging one
(The only way E-100 can deal with tier 10 TDs, really)
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37265105]The tumor can be penetrated by E-100s gun.
I penetrated it twice while facehugging one
(The only way E-100 can deal with tier 10 TDs, really)[/QUOTE]
But I'm not an E-100 :(
I'm not tall enough to hit the damn thing, if I try facehugging I'll hit it angled which means I'll ding all day erry' day.
When I'm a BatChat I just go in a corner and cry until it goes away.
Batchat can penetrate (albeit not really reliably) the top and bottom of the front hull.
They are same thickness so just pick and choose the one better suited your angle.
[img]http://localhostr.com/files/cCkXdCH/now%20were%20talking.png[/img]
[h2]NOW THAT'S MORE LIKE IT[/h2]
[editline]16th August 2012[/editline]
[img]http://localhostr.com/files/OS0GivN/because%20why%20not.png[/img]
Confirmed T5 arty coming in 8.0
Oh god what, that is just silly. I assume that thing has a 6 round auto loader as well right?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
