World of Tanks - SIEMA PL? - Games

Latest from Storm [quote]Game modes will be selectable Assault will be available from Tier 6+ only Encounter will be available from Tier4+ only French may get Premium Tier 7 heavy this year if there is time E-100 will get HP increase and probably traverse speed. Further buffs are also not out of the question In 8.0 IS-4 model will be replaced with IS-4M Selectable modes for platoons, after 8.0, possibly in 8.2[/quote] More HP for E-100, what a predictably lame buff that won't fix any of the main problems (low pen/acc, shitty front lower hull) of the tank that give it such a low WR. Unless they give it something like 2800, then it could be called a buff.

[QUOTE=Orkel;37285654]Latest from Storm More HP for E-100, what a predictably lame buff that won't fix any of the main problems (low pen/acc, shitty front lower hull) of the tank that give it such a low WR. Unless they give it something like 2800, then it could be called a buff.[/QUOTE] No love for the Maus again. They can't exactly give it too much HP without turning it into a paper Maus with a better gun. Also IS-4M? I guess it has even more hull armor than the current IS-4 and a similarly strong turret (minus the top armor obviously). Russian Maus with much better gun.

[QUOTE=ze beaver;37285714]No love for the Maus again. They can't exactly give it too much HP without turning it into a paper Maus with a better gun. Also IS-4M? I guess it has even more hull armor than the current IS-4 and a similarly strong turret (minus the top armor obviously). Russian Maus with much better gun.[/QUOTE] IS-4M also removes driver's hatch weakspot from the front.

[QUOTE=Orkel;37285654]Assault will be available from Tier 6+ only[/QUOTE] They need to balance assault or throw it out of the game completely. I would love to see some attacking/defending winrates for horribly unbalanced maps like Prokhorovka. I bet it's 30%-70% or something. Also, as for the E100 and Maus, Wargaming need to get of their biased asses and give them a massive armour buff. Make them heavy tanks again instead of cardboard boxes.

[QUOTE=Orkel;37285722]IS-4M also removes driver's hatch weakspot from the front.[/QUOTE] To be honest since 7.3 or when the driver hatch is more of strongpoint than weakpoint. Less, but still sloped 200mm and the sides which are like wtfsloped lying all on the 140mm. It should just be the good ol' 160mm plate from beta ages.

Russian 8.0 preview vid. Shows the new Russian TDs, new tech tree and the stuff we already know of (physics, new post-battle stats etc) [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGeTO09CK04[/hd] Obj 263 is open-topped. Do not want

Horizontal research screen merged with store nerdgasm

Not gonna lie, physics look good. [editline]17th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37286004]Horizontal research screen merged with store nerdgasm[/QUOTE] I am now 100% sure that rising competition has caused them to work harder at updates.

Decals I can't contain the vanity induced jizz

[QUOTE=Orkel;37285948]Obj 263 is open-topped. Do not want[/QUOTE] That zero gun depression.

Dem tech tree.

Jesus christ WHAT URALMASH-1 (tier 8 new soviet TD) has M62 IS-4 gun wtff

[QUOTE=Orkel;37285654]Latest from Storm More HP for E-100, what a predictably lame buff that won't fix any of the main problems (low pen/acc, shitty front lower hull) of the tank that give it such a low WR. Unless they give it something like 2800, then it could be called a buff.[/QUOTE] I've heard that the E-100 will be getting it's reload time nerf removed. (Back to normal 16 secs. not 17) and the pen will be buffed by like 5-10

Quick pause in the video and we have 263's preliminary gun stats. 735 average damage .35 accuracy ~260mm pen ROF is not visible, but with the lower-than-other-T10-TDs damage, and lower-than-other-T10-TDs penetration, we can expect it to have a much higher RoF, therefore very high DPS.

I just made a mess.

Whole new soviet TD branch: [h2]LUST[/h2]

Hmm, I thought they planned to move SU-100M1 to tier 6 and split SU-122-xx into two variants? [editline]1[/editline] Oh yeah: SU-100M-1 (tier 6), Uralmash-1 (tier 7), SU-122-44 (tier 8), SU-122-54 (tier 9), Object 263 (tier 10). I hope you can still go via SU-100, I don't really feel like buying back an SU-85 to grind the new branch.

Different camos are going to give bonuses depending on map type. Fucking great, that's the last thing I wanted to see.

[QUOTE=pawelte1;37286125]Different camos are going to give bonuses depending on map type. Fucking great, that's the last thing I wanted to see.[/QUOTE] Yeah this is the one thing I don't like. Game has too much camo already.

Pen a Tiger P with a kv2 for [B]1104[/B] Villi follows up with an ammorack he mod

[QUOTE=Raidyr;37286162]Yeah this is the one thing I don't like. Game has too much camo already.[/QUOTE] In my opinion the biggest problem with this is that if you want to have bonuses on every map type, you have to either spend hundreds, if not thousands of gold or pay millions of credits.

Then did 914 to a lowe 2.43K KV2 game, best kv2 game ever :D 4600 damage game with the 152...

[QUOTE=pawelte1;37286186]In my opinion the biggest problem with this is that if you want to have bonuses on every map type, you have to either spend hundreds, if not thousands of gold or pay millions of credits.[/QUOTE] I know it's subject to change, but in that video 300k credits per week, multiplied by 3 map types. :suicide:

I got killed by (I forgot the name but the second TD after the very first French one) because he was constantly pushing against me really can't wait for physics so I can push shit around/ off cliffs. I was in my Stug.

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37286049]Jesus christ WHAT URALMASH-1 (tier 8 new soviet TD) has M62 IS-4 gun wtff[/QUOTE] And the SU-122-44 (T7) has the motherfucking D-54. What the shit is WG doing. It's like they want the other TD line to feel absolutely useless. [QUOTE=Orkel;37286058]Quick pause in the video and we have 263's preliminary gun stats. 735 average damage .35 accuracy ~260mm pen ROF is not visible, but with the lower-than-other-T10-TDs damage, and lower-than-other-T10-TDs penetration, we can expect it to have a much higher RoF, therefore very high DPS.[/QUOTE] Maybe it's firing APCR like the mediums though, that'd mean better penetration against angled surfaces.

[QUOTE=ze beaver;37286320]And the SU-122-44 (T7) has the motherfucking D-54.[/QUOTE] If you're talking about the SU-122-54 in the video, that's tier 9, not 7. And as I noted above, they are still screwing around with them all if you compare the video to the development notes.

[QUOTE=ze beaver;37286320]And the SU-122-44 (T7) has the motherfucking D-54. What the shit is WG doing. It's like they want the other TD line to feel absolutely useless. Maybe it's firing APCR like the mediums though, that'd mean better penetration against angled surfaces.[/QUOTE] 122-44 and Uralmash both have shitty 90mm of front armor. Sides are likely made rice paper. Edit: no wait, 122-44 isn't known yet. SU-100M-1 is the one with 90mm in addition to the Uralmash.

Sold AMX 90 and Ferdi to buy IS-3.

[QUOTE=cccino;37286402]If you're talking about the SU-122-54 in the video, that's tier 9, not 7. And as I noted above, they are still screwing around with them all if you compare the video to the development notes.[/QUOTE] I swear when I last looked at the tree it was SU-122-44 -> Uralmash-1 -> SU-122-54 -> Object 263 Anyway those won't be that much of a problem considering the French TDs get a similar gun at T7 with even more frontal armor. The SU-122-54 looks scary though, as much armor as the 704, much more speed and the IS-4's M-62.

[QUOTE=lintz;37286456]Sold AMX 90 and Ferdi to buy IS-3.[/QUOTE] IS-3 is great but be ready for IS-8 being awkward. I couldn't play it at all due to the awful gun depression. Patton horribly spoiled me.