• World of Tanks - SIEMA PL?
    10,001 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Orkel;37285948]Russian 8.0 preview vid. Shows the new Russian TDs, new tech tree and the stuff we already know of (physics, new post-battle stats etc) [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGeTO09CK04[/hd] Obj 263 is open-topped. Do not want[/QUOTE] Oh snap guys. 0:50 on the video - you can see a second American tier 9 medium, T54E2! [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v211/KnowYourRoots/T54E2-1.jpg[/img]
Do you guys remember how we laughed how awful it has that USA tree has 3 tanks built on the same T29 chassis? Now they are going to have [B]6[/B] tanks built on the T110 one.
When is the 8.0 testing and how do i join, because that looks awesome. edit: not that tank he just posted specifically, i just mean the physics, and also maybe the graphics looked a bit different too.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37286586]Oh snap guys. 0:50 on the video - you can see a second American tier 9 medium, T54E2! [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v211/KnowYourRoots/T54E2-1.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] That looks a little too similar to the M48... Anyway after looking at the video at something else than 240p I noticed it wasn't the SU-122-44 but the SU-100M1 and that its gun looks like the D-54 but it's tier 8 so I'm guessing they made up a 100mm gun to fit the spot. Then there's the SU-122-54, the gun looks waaay too big to be the M-62 (and it lacks a bore evacuator which should be there since the D-25TA had it), if it's the 130mm I'm gonna cry.
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37286679]That looks a little too similar to the M48... Anyway after looking at the video at something else than 240p I noticed it wasn't the SU-122-44 but the SU-100M1 and that its gun looks like the D-54 but it's tier 8 so I'm guessing they made up a 100mm gun to fit the spot. Then there's the SU-122-54, the gun looks waaay too big to be the M-62 (and it lacks a bore evacuator which should be there since the D-25TA had it), if it's the 130mm I'm gonna cry.[/QUOTE] You can see it in the research pages they also show. It [B]is[/B] 130mm [sp]Come here, you can cry on my shoulder[/sp]
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37286646]Do you guys remember how we laughed how awful it has that USA tree has 3 tanks built on the same T29 chassis? Now they are going to have [B]6[/B] tanks built on the T110 one.[/QUOTE] Atleast it's a better chassis than the T29.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37286646]Do you guys remember how we laughed how awful it has that USA tree has 3 tanks built on the same T29 chassis? Now they are going to have [B]6[/B] tanks built on the T110 one.[/QUOTE] It was more that the t29 chassis was awful
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37286707]You can see it in the research pages they also show. It [B]is[/B] 130mm [sp]Come here, you can cry on my shoulder[/sp][/QUOTE] Is the M-62 also there? Because it was meant to be mounted on the SU-122-54 first :v: Anyway, maybe if this sad little Netbook could handle anything higher than 480p I'd be able to see the details in that video, like how they're giving a 130mm gun to one of the most nimble tanks in the fucking game.
[QUOTE=ayaki;37286720]It was more that the t29 chassis was awful[/QUOTE] and it's still better than the tiger I chassis
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37286646]Do you guys remember how we laughed how awful it has that USA tree has 3 tanks built on the same T29 chassis? Now they are going to have [B]6[/B] tanks built on the T110 one.[/QUOTE] At least the T110 has better armor + they give it even more depending on the tank.
[QUOTE=Skwee;37286671]When is the 8.0 testing and how do i join, because that looks awesome. edit: not that tank he just posted specifically, i just mean the physics, and also maybe the graphics looked a bit different too.[/QUOTE] since no one is responding, i think due to being last posts on page
[QUOTE=Skwee;37286831]since no one is responding, i think due to being last posts on page[/QUOTE] If you have registered an account about a month before the test starts you're automatically in. You just have to wait for us to go batshit and spam the thread with links to the news article when it starts.
Translating some stuff 0:18 update includes 1 new graphics 2 new lighting 3 physics 0:36 reworked tech tree 1 shows necessary XP for next tank 2 you can buy stuff from there 3 premium tanks are now in tech tree 4 looks more modern (LOL) 1:06 extended battle statistics 1 thing everybody dreamed of (LOL) 2 data on how much damage you did 3 more details 4 how much you got and how much you would get if you had PREMIUM 5 not only fancy, but you can also study your game(LOL) 2:00 camos reworked 1 3 types of maps summer winter desert, each needs own camo 2 camo adds 5% to camo value 3 bonus works for both gold and silver camos(WOW HOW AMAZING) 4 only authenticaly painted battle vehicles 5 developers allowed to put emblems and signs on tanks (pics, banners, slogans, and more) MANY unique elements, nation based 2:55 battle options 1 you can turn off new gamemodes 2 you can't turn off standart battle (LOL) 3:09 upgraded system of fast commands 1 looks more modern (LOL) 2 more newb frendly 3:20 new USSR TDs 1 SU-100M1 goes from SU-100 (grinding time) 2 stuff not worth translating 3 good agility 4 low profile 5 good camo 6 sloped frontal armor 9999:99 sorry for crappy my english
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37286740]Is the M-62 also there? Because it was meant to be mounted on the SU-122-54 first :v: Anyway, maybe if this sad little Netbook could handle anything higher than 480p I'd be able to see the details in that video, like how they're giving a 130mm gun to one of the most nimble tanks in the fucking game.[/QUOTE] Yes, SU-122-54 AND Uralmash both have M-62.
[QUOTE=Uzkanda;37286917]Translating some stuff -stuff- 9999:99 sorry for crappy my english[/QUOTE] So, people in Lithuania have Russian at school too?
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37286679]That looks a little too similar to the M48... Anyway after looking at the video at something else than 240p I noticed it wasn't the SU-122-44 but the SU-100M1 and that its gun looks like the D-54 but it's tier 8 so I'm guessing they made up a 100mm gun to fit the spot. Then there's the SU-122-54, the gun looks waaay too big to be the M-62 (and it lacks a bore evacuator which should be there since the D-25TA had it), if it's the 130mm I'm gonna cry.[/QUOTE] They both use the same hull I believe. It was just a different turret that made them different tanks.
I would make a wild guess and presume it's a development somewhere between M48 and M60.
[QUOTE=pawelte1;37286959]So, people in Lithuania have Russian at school too?[/QUOTE] As a second foreign language you can take russian, german or french, and no I took german, learnt russian from games, movies and ppl around.
For people who cant be bothered too rewatch the video to see the T54E2 Orkel informed us about. [img]http://i804.photobucket.com/albums/yy327/ZeroAshes32/T54WG.png[/img] [editline]18th August 2012[/editline] If they're introducing the T54E2, they're most likely also bringing in the T95 which was the Patton M60 rival project. It could mount like...four different guns. [editline]18th August 2012[/editline] T95E2 – Turret from the M48A2, 90 mm rifled gun. T95E3 – Turret from the M48A2, 105 mm rifled gun. T95E4 – Turret from the T96, 105 mm smoothbore gun. T95E5 – A T95E2 with a 105 mm British rifled gun, never built. T95E6 – Turret from the T96, 120 mm rifled gun, never built. T95E7 – A T95E1 with a 105 mm British gun, never built. T95E8 – A T95E2 with a 12V71T diesel engine.
[QUOTE=O'Neil;37287069]For people who cant be bothered too rewatch the video to see the T54E2 Orkel informed us about. [img]http://i804.photobucket.com/albums/yy327/ZeroAshes32/T54WG.png[/img] [editline]18th August 2012[/editline] If they're introducing the T54E2, they're most likely also bringing in the T95 which was the Patton M60 rival project. It could mount like...four different guns.[/QUOTE] Wait The T54E2 is T9 [B]what are you doing WG[/B] How the fuck is the M46/M48 better/equal than the T54E2/T95 combo?
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37287111]Wait The T54E2 is T9 [B]what are you doing WG[/B] How the fuck is the M46/M48 better/equal than the T54E2/T95 combo?[/QUOTE] Think they're making the "heavy" medium line for the US tree. Most likely braching from the E2 and possibly the T25 medium tank or T23 then off to the T54E2.
Superpershing tries NOT to facehug KV-5, runs away from it and when the KV-5 finally starts fachugging him and failing to kill him.... he tries to shoot through its mantlet. I call him out on it "shut up ill make 50k credits this match" gah
[QUOTE=scout1;37287236] "shut up ill make 50k credits this match"[/QUOTE] tier8premiumdriver.txt
[QUOTE=cccino;37286230]I know it's subject to change, but in that video 300k credits per week, multiplied by 3 map types. :suicide:[/QUOTE] It's a tiny camouflage bonus. It's not worth it unless you've got a top-tier TD you really want tricked out. :v:
[QUOTE=scout1;37287236]Superpershing tries NOT to facehug KV-5, runs away from it and when the KV-5 finally starts fachugging him and failing to kill him.... he tries to shoot through its mantlet. I call him out on it "shut up ill make 50k credits this match" gah[/QUOTE] Funniest is that I consider 50k credits in KV-5 match without premium mediocre.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37286586]Oh snap guys. 0:50 on the video - you can see a second American tier 9 medium, T54E2! [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v211/KnowYourRoots/T54E2-1.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] WAIT FUCK THE T54 AND THE T54E1 HAVE AUTO LOADERS, THIS ONE HAS A HUMAN ONE DREAMS = CRUSHED.
263 will have smallest tier 10 gun, that doesn't sound soviet at all.
Wait if they're adding the T54, and the entire project was abandoned in favor of the T95 Medium, does that me the T95 is gonna be a tier 10 medium?
I wonder if the brits will get some sort of experimental 6-pdr autoloader [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Molins_autoloader_and_6-pounder_gun_WWII_IWM_A_25159.jpg[/img] Would be interesting
[QUOTE=fishyfish777;37287748]I wonder if the brits will get some sort of experimental 6-pdr autoloader [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Molins_autoloader_and_6-pounder_gun_WWII_IWM_A_25159.jpg[/img] Would be interesting[/QUOTE] [B]I don't think we need it.[/B]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.