[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37287780]I got M68 on M48A1.
What is it inaccuracy?[/QUOTE]
what is stopping?
[QUOTE=Uzkanda;37287679]263 will have smallest tier 10 gun, that doesn't sound soviet at all.[/QUOTE]
It'll probably have JT's reload speed, since it's open top and wargaming likes to increase RoF
While at flanking speed, M48A1 is about as accurate as fully aimed KV-1S.
Also the shells fly so fast it feels almost like hitscan.
[editline]17th August 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=goon165;37287787]what is stopping?[/QUOTE]
what is it somebody shooting at anybody else but me? ;_;
[editline]17th August 2012[/editline]
I just got targeted by about 5 enemies with fellow AMX 50 120 right next to me
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37287805]
what is it somebody shooting at anybody else but me? ;_;
[editline]17th August 2012[/editline]
I just got targeted by about 5 enemies with fellow AMX 50 120 right next to me[/QUOTE]
New Tank Syndrome.
Also, tanks can go underwater now, apparently. KV-2 D-Day, soon.
[QUOTE=gufu;37287967]Also, tanks can go underwater now, apparently. KV-2 D-Day, soon.[/QUOTE]
How would you get it out?
[QUOTE=gufu;37287967]Also, tanks can go underwater now, apparently. KV-2 D-Day, soon.[/QUOTE]
only some can, they said.
[QUOTE=gufu;37287967]Also, tanks can go underwater now, apparently. KV-2 D-Day, soon.[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvCI-gNK_y4[/media]
Where is everyone seeing the SU-122-44?
In the video it went SU-100M > Uralmash-1 > SU-122-54 > Object
[quote]Credits received: 5,896 (fine for causing damage to allies: 9,237; compensation for damage caused by allies: 3,931)[/quote]
IS starts humping my ST-I, keeps me from moving forward for a solid minute.
I shoot him once (BL-9), and then another time later for about 700 total damage.
He shoots me enough times to do about 1800 damage.
Team damage tweak my fucking ass. Who the fuck was lying out of their teeth about that, because it's as shite as ever. :v:
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;37288134]Where is everyone seeing the SU-122-44?
In the video it went SU-100M > Uralmash-1 > SU-122-54 > Object[/QUOTE]
Probably will be another tier 8 premium, same way as IS-6 was.
[QUOTE=Doom14;37288227]IS starts humping my ST-I, keeps me from moving forward for a solid minute.
I shoot him once (BL-9), and then another time later for about 700 total damage.
He shoots me enough times to do about 1800 damage.
Team damage tweak my fucking ass. Who the fuck was lying out of their teeth about that, because it's as shite as ever. :v:[/QUOTE]
thats what teammates are for in wot!
In my JP E-100, fire at an incoming enemy E-50M and do 1200 damage. But the E-50M continues rushing, his goal to sidehug me.
As the E-50M is a second away from reaching my side, an enemy Obj 261 fires at me, hits the E-50M, does 700-800 damage and sets it on fire, killing it.
Saved from sidehug.
[QUOTE=cpt.armadillo;37288008]How would you get it out?[/QUOTE]
It simply raises water levels and drowns all the other tanks on the map.
thats what [del]enemies[/del] teammates are for
[editline]17th August 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Orkel;37288252]In my JP E-100, fire at an incoming enemy E-50M and do 1200 damage. But the E-50M continues rushing, his goal to sidehug me.
As the E-50M is a second away from reaching my side, an enemy Obj 261 fires at me, hits the E-50M, does 700-800 damage and sets it on fire, killing it.
Saved from sidehug.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Tampong;37283681]Where is that tank standing?[/QUOTE]
The Swedish Army museum in stockholm.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2VIqrjZL3Y[/media]
:45, T-28s also doubled as boats it seems
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37288638][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2VIqrjZL3Y[/media]
:45, T-28s also doubled as boats it seems[/QUOTE]
1:28 fuck this tree
JP E-100 and AMX 50B buffs in 0.8.0 detailed.
[quote=JP E-100]+2 degrees hull rotation speed
+7-8% passability on different grounds
better aiming speed
lower spread by moving of gun/tower[/quote]
[quote=AMX 50B]hull rotation speed +4°
10% lower spread by moving.
+100hp
+9% ROF
+2° to gun angle (down/up)
20% lower spread by moving gun and tower
+4°/sec tower rotation[/quote]
oh my, +2 deg rotation speed, however shall we use it?? I see they buffed 50B elevation.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37288944]JP E-100 and AMX 50B buffs in 0.8.0 detailed.[/QUOTE]
[B]YES[/B]
They finally fixed the 50B.
Then again, I don't have one so why the fuck am I cheering for that buff.
[editline]17th August 2012[/editline]
You know, if the Lee sounded like that
[MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1xGnaqiU1I[/MEDIA]
I'd probably fear it a lot more on the battlefield.
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37288638][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2VIqrjZL3Y[/media]
:45, T-28s also doubled as boats it seems[/QUOTE]
T-28 might be not stand well against tanks but I can imagine that for infantrymen it was absolutely fucking horrifying.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37289599]T-28 might be not stand well against tanks but I can imagine that for infantrymen it was absolutely fucking horrifying.[/QUOTE]
Massive battlebus that they can't hurt without AT rifle or grenades in the tracks rushing at them, not caring about terrain firing wild HE shells into the huddles of pissing infantrymen with soviet music in the background. With both front MGs blazing.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37289599]T-28 might be not stand well against tanks but I can imagine that for infantrymen it was absolutely fucking horrifying.[/QUOTE]
Also have to keep in mind how these things would've broken down and had a lack of combat efficiency. M3 Lee commanders had issues giving everyone orders and I bet the T-28 would also. Plus we all know that soviet engineering wasn't exactly the best. Lots of incidents with T-34's breaking down just outside the factory.
Not to mention the absence of fucks given to the crews.
Didn't the loader on the T-34 sit on a box of ammo or something?
[QUOTE=N-12_Aden;37289839]Not to mention the absence of fucks given to the crews.
Didn't the loader on the T-34 sit on a box of ammo or something?[/QUOTE]
The whole floor was boxes of ammo, the only difference is that the loader didn't have a seat in the turret.
The driver wasn't really sitting ON ammo though, but he had a compressed air tank in front of his feet :v:
[QUOTE=O'Neil;37289783]Lots of incidents with T-34's breaking down just outside the factory.[/QUOTE]
Not exactly. T-34's suspension was rather reliable and the engine would stop working instead of getting lit on fire. The problem that soviet tank crew had 1-2 hours worth of tank training which resulted in poor performance.
[QUOTE=scout1;37272084]Yeah I dunno who said the ARL V39 sucks, but I'm finding it pretty good with the 105. Average exp of 700, win rate of 63%...[/QUOTE]
Hey a new best! By 1 exp! :v:
[quote]Victory!
Battle: Karelia Friday, August 17, 2012 4:48:00 PM
Vehicle: ARL V39
Experience received: 1,663
Credits received: 45,175[/quote]
While I know everyone wants new tanks for the existing tree, for the love of god can they get the British out already!
Each new branch they add are filled with tons of prototypes and blueprint tanks. With the current British tree they have at the moment, there are only two tanks that are kind of like that. The FV215(133) (a blueprint vehicle) and the FV4202 (they built it to test technologies, and they worked). Every other tank reached production (save the black prince which production was halted with the coming of the centurion)
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
