I say - decrease damage; make it possible to flip and kill yourself instantly (it's now impossible)
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37357132]I say - decrease damage; make it possible to flip and kill yourself instantly (it's now impossible)[/QUOTE]
well not instantly, make it a slow drain on health like it is when two tanks are on top of eachother so you have a chance to flip yourself back over with the help of your teammates.
I wish ammorack kills actually did this
[img]http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5501/soustov.be/0_4b10b_5cb83fec_XL.jpg[/img]
(yes that used to be a Ferdinand)
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37357315]I wish ammorack kills actually did this
[img]http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5501/soustov.be/0_4b10b_5cb83fec_XL.jpg[/img]
(yes that used to be a Ferdinand)[/QUOTE]
Flying slabs of metal hitting other tanks in an area.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37357315]I wish ammorack kills actually did this[/QUOTE]
I recalled some mention of this so I hunted it down:
[quote]Sooooooooo........turret flies off and lands somewhere if you ammo rack the enemy? yes? Yes please? Does it? yes? Gonna? yes?[/quote]
[quote=Vallter]No, unfortunately, not in this update. But this and many other visual features of damaging vehicle are planned[/quote]
So that's a "maybe, eventually".
If you think about it, ammoracked T92 should also destroy everything in 50 meter radius.
Am I the only one who thinks that ammoracked tanks should have the possibility of damaging surrounding tanks?
It would be hilarious to pop a KV-2 into ammorack and get triple kill because there were two low tiers near him.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37357709]If you think about it, ammoracked T92 should also destroy everything in 50 meter radius.
Am I the only one who thinks that ammoracked tanks should have the possibility of damaging surrounding tanks?
It would be hilarious to pop a KV-2 into ammorack and get triple kill because there were two low tiers near him.[/QUOTE]
If ammorack durability went down and ammorack explosion radius went up progressively as you carried more and more ammo, I'd finally have a reason to carry the full load of 36 152 shells in my KV-2
Considering one 152 shell blows off the turret of a Tiger, imagine 36 of them going off at once
[url]http://worldoftanks.com/news/1499-world-tanks-50000-follow-twitter-contest/[/url]
[quote]Tankers!
Help World of Tanks get 50,000 followers on Twitter! From August 20th to September 2nd, retweet our daily Twitter contest tweet between 9 AM PDT (4 AM UTC) and 9 PM PDT (4 PM UTC) and you’ll be entered to win daily prizes. [B]If 50,000 followers are reached by August 2nd, ten grand prize winners will win 50,000![/B] [I]This contest is open to all servers.[/I] [/quote]
[url]https://twitter.com/worldoftanks[/url]
doit
[IMG]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/49828537/World%20of%20Tanks/titsaregrimmshitplates.jpg[/IMG]
I'm in love.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37358772][hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMb-jnPTx3c[/hd][/QUOTE]
One of those artillery players who will fire no matter what happens. They think that pressing T gives them the right to ignore their teammates in the area
A little bonus to my informative miniseries of posts.
4th kind of armor
INFLATABLE ARMOR
[img]http://wwiimodeller.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/Inflaty-Sherman1.jpg[/img]
(I swear that the M4 ingame uses protective values of this)
A surprisingly acceptable review vid by WG.
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDHSrZNzKVc[/hd]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/qZ53j.png[/img]
:v: Unsurprisingly, he got himself killed early on by trying to push several other T10 heavies while trying to kill a Lorraine40t.
[QUOTE=JETFIGHTER5;37359724][img]http://i.imgur.com/qZ53j.png[/img]
:v: Unsurprisingly, he got himself killed early on by trying to push several other T10 heavies while trying to kill a Lorraine40t.[/QUOTE]
I have never seen such an accurate name in this game.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWCj9w-c8cY&feature=youtu.be[/media]
lets go down this flank we thought,
no one ever comes up this flank we thought.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37359500]A surprisingly acceptable review vid by WG.
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDHSrZNzKVc[/hd][/QUOTE]
Yeah that is pretty good.
Although I can't help but imagine the guy narrating it not giving a fuck about online tanks.
[QUOTE=goon165;37360035][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWCj9w-c8cY&feature=youtu.be[/media]
lets go down this flank we thought,
no one ever comes up this flank we thought.[/QUOTE]
I feel so special :3
[IMG]http://i47.tinypic.com/jintpc.png[/IMG]
Woo!
Guys.
Wargaming blocked the entrance to the Wisecave on himmelsdorf in 8.0
RIP
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq54jb_5WCI[/media]
So there is this guy with [url=http://worldoftanks.com/community/accounts/1000469014-Viperone/]22k battles...[/url]
He goes and posts this on the forum, and includes a poll
[quote]This tank should be a bit better than the T59 [b]but why does it have tier 3 amour? It has the weakest hull of any tier 8 Tank.[/b] The real disappointment is that I bought a worthless premium tank. Can it be fixed or can I have my 21.95 back in gold.
I suggest to anyone that bought one to share your thoughts on the T62 Chinese tank. Its expensive lesson of buying this premium tank. I feel Ive been ripped off and wouldve spent gold on a premium account for what so I can get ripped off. I swear if I have to eat this tank I wont spend any more gold on this game. [/quote]
The poll
[quote]Do you feel like youve been ripped off by buying T62 Chinese tank?
[]Yes I feel it is a worthless [b]tier 8[/b] premium tank.
[]Do you feel that 21.95 would be better in my pocket.
[]Will you spend money on premium tanks anymore after buying one.
[]WOTs should have a return policy on products sold for cash as any other business that uses money.[/quote]
I don't even...
8.0 is now the worst patch they could ever put out.
Rip maus cave.
[QUOTE=kirederf7;37358489][IMG]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/49828537/World%20of%20Tanks/titsaregrimmshitplates.jpg[/IMG]
I'm in love.[/QUOTE]
This is the direct opposite of my experience with the tank.
[img]http://bronetehnika.narod.ru/is2/is2_108.jpg[/img]
RIP IS-2, most probably destroyed by an ammo rack.
[QUOTE=Azaz3l;37360677][img]http://bronetehnika.narod.ru/is2/is2_108.jpg[/img]
RIP IS-2, most probably destroyed by an ammo rack.[/QUOTE]
Why is the engine in the crew compartment?
[QUOTE=Ogopogo;37360335]So there is this guy with [url=http://worldoftanks.com/community/accounts/1000469014-Viperone/]22k battles...[/url]
He goes and posts this on the forum, and includes a poll
[quote]This tank should be a bit better than the T59[/quote]
The poll
I don't even...[/QUOTE]
Oh god, he presumes higher number > better
excuse me but I can't help myself
:downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs::downs:
Poor crewmen.
This reminds me when I was playing Medal of Honor Airborne and destroyed a Tiger.
I could hear screaming inside the tank, scarred me for life.
[QUOTE=Wiseman400;37360476]8.0 is now the worst patch they could ever put out.
Rip maus cave.[/QUOTE]
You can tuck tanks into random smaller nooks and crannies now though so it's not all that bad
There's a bunch of mini mauscaves around Himmelsdorf
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37360694]Oh god, he presumes higher number > better
excuse me but I can't help myself[/QUOTE]
Obviously the M1 Abrams is the worse tank ever built then.
so is the physics test over?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
