I was wondering if anybody here has a RU account with tanks past tier 4 and wants a 2k gold promo code
[QUOTE=Tampong;37432053][video=youtube;rzqp9hSZ9Vo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzqp9hSZ9Vo&feature=player_detailpage#t=3315s[/video]
Skip to 55:15 to see one fire.[/QUOTE]
jesus fuck
[URL=http://lh.rs/Dr9fyDA6qnwC]I'm actually surprised by how many fucks the M48A1 does not give[/URL].
I had to deal with that T110E4 while at 400 HP but fortunately he was a retard and I managed to kill him along with the JT and a bunch of other tanks :v:
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Vk3001.png[/img]
128 mm gun, oh God.
[QUOTE=CabooseRvB;37433588][t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Vk3001.png[/t]
128 mm gun, oh God.[/QUOTE]
And no fucking armor. World of Tanks doesn't work like the real world, where this beauty would be two to three fucking miles out - so it would end up like another Dickermax.
What a shame.
(That said, it's fucking sexy. It's like a Nashorn on crack.)
[QUOTE=Doom14;37433710]And no fucking armor. World of Tanks doesn't work like the real world, where this beauty would be two to three fucking miles out - so it would end up like another Dickermax.
What a shame.
(That said, it's fucking sexy. It's like a Nashorn on crack.)[/QUOTE]
The Dickermax is a fucking amazing tank, if the Sturer Emil is anywhere close to that I'll grind the shit out of it.
The only problem about that tank is the 300 HP engine and 35 tons weight, and the 18 rounds ammo capacity and 7 degrees firing arc.
It also did pretty wonderfully in the war considering one of them was captured with 22 kill rings on the barrel.
Just make the mantlet out of rubber and it would make a good hulldown tank
Also before anyone says "hurr durr second JT gun on T7 tank OP nerf pls"
[B]It's not the JT's second gun.[/B]
That gun has a lower muzzle velocity than the 128 L/55 because it's a much earlier design.
Caboose I'm gonna marder you for that merge break.
[QUOTE=CabooseRvB;37433588][img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Vk3001.png[/img]
128 mm gun, oh God.[/QUOTE]
-snip I'm wrong-
[QUOTE=Azaz3l;37433887]That's pretty sad since the gun is imaginary, Germans only had one 128mm - kwk 44 L/55.[/QUOTE]
But...
That tank actually existed, and it had that gun. The one captured example is at Kubinka.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12.8_cm_FlaK_40[/url]
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37433909]But...
That tank actually existed, and it had that gun. The one captured example is at Kubinka.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12.8_cm_FlaK_40[/url][/QUOTE]
Ye I was wrong :v:
dual 128, do want
[img_thumb] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/12.8_cm_Flakzwilling_40_1.jpg[/img_thumb]
[QUOTE=Doom14;37429698][img]http://www.tankmuseum.ru/images/pav6-14.jpg[/img]
It still fucking horrifies me that they built one of these. The thought of what the Germans might have built, if Hitler wasn't such a tactical cockgoblin, is quite interesting.
It's a mix of national classifications and in-game fantasy. We don't call the X mediums MBTs or the Pershing a Medium/Heavy tank.
The E-50 is basically a super-refined, up armored Panther II mish-mashed with some sex, gun and engine. It's a medium more because of how it acts in game rather than it's actual real life purpose.[/QUOTE]
For reference, the biggest shell it fired, (600mm) weighed about 2.5 tons.
Karl-Gerät was fucking huge.
[editline]27th August 2012[/editline]
Also, got accepted into the WoWP Beta at last. Is it still a piece of shit not worth playing?
[QUOTE=ZombieWaffle;37435036]For reference, the biggest shell it fired, (600mm) weighed about 2.5 tons.
Karl-Gerät was fucking huge.
[editline]27th August 2012[/editline]
Also, got accepted into the WoWP Beta at last. Is it still a piece of shit not worth playing?[/QUOTE]
[B]YES[/B]
So doing some research, looking through some player made trees for the Japanese. Then I went off to do some more searching of my own...
The Japanese may not have built decent tanks (besides a few of them on the drawing board/blueprints) but their SPG's...
I give you the type 4 Ha-To. Armed with a [b]300mm[/b] mortar and capable of firing a 374 pound shell down range. A prototype was built during WWII, but it was deemed to expensive despite its effectiveness.
[img]http://ww2drawings.jexiste.fr/Images/1-Vehicles(bis)/Japan/05-SPG/Type4-HaTo/p1.jpg[/img]
[editline]27th August 2012[/editline]
Don't let wargamming see it.
NOPE
NOP
EONP
ENOPE
NOEPNE
NOEP
[QUOTE=W0w00t;37435915]NOPE
NOP
EONP
ENOPE
NOEPNE
NOEP[/QUOTE]
Don't worry, they even have bigger guns then that which could make for a great upgrade. Like the 320mm Type 98 mortar, which fired 675lb shells, and I quote...
[quote] left craters 8 feet (2.4 m) deep and 15 feet (4.6 m) wide[/quote]
8 feet deep holyshit
[editline]27th August 2012[/editline]
Is the ELC getting a nerf next patch?
hope it doesnt
[QUOTE=Ogopogo;37436007]Don't worry, they even have bigger guns then that which could make for a great upgrade. Like the 320mm Type 98 mortar, which fired 675lb shells, and I quote...[/QUOTE]
Fire 2 of these in the same spot and you got a foxhole for your Maus :v:
[QUOTE=Ogopogo;37436007]Don't worry, they even have bigger guns then that which could make for a great upgrade. Like the 320mm Type 98 mortar, which fired 675lb shells, and I quote...[/QUOTE]
SORRY I PLAYED MEN OF WAR TOO MUCH TO SEE THIS AGAIN.
Trash can cannon for churchill pls
[img]http://www.strijdbewijs.nl/tanks/churchill/avre03.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=CabooseRvB;37437947]Trash can cannon for churchill pls
[img]http://www.strijdbewijs.nl/tanks/churchill/avre03.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
They fucking better. Next to the terrible (real life) KV-2, the proposed crane-loaded Sturmtiger and other silly concepts - having a spigot makes perfect sense. In fact, it'd be another hilariously fun KV-2 style tank.
it's confirmed as a premium tank at least in the old initial tree.
I already have 154 battles with T25 AT, my kills/battles ratio is higher than 1 but I'm still bad with it. So bad that today an M10 managed to take me down by shooting at my 'sloped' front.
[QUOTE=pawelte1;37438445]I already have 154 battles with T25 AT, my kills/battles ratio is higher than 1 but I'm still bad with it. So bad that today an M10 managed to take me down by shooting at my 'sloped' front.[/QUOTE]
Oh is the T25 AT that bad? The T25/2 is actually kinda fun if you end up as the top tier tank in a match.
[QUOTE=boboerror;37438663]Oh is the T25 AT that bad? The T25/2 is actually kinda fun if you end up as the top tier tank in a match.[/QUOTE]
It's not bad, it just doesn't fit my playstyle. On the other hand, when there are tier 9 tanks in the same battle then obviously every tier 7 tank is bad.
[QUOTE=boboerror;37438663]Oh is the T25 AT that bad? The T25/2 is actually kinda fun if you end up as the top tier tank in a match.[/QUOTE]
It was the best tier 7 TD until the french one came.
[t]http://puu.sh/ZAg5[/t]
ALERT
TURN BACK NOW
At last wargaming answers the most gripping question on everyone's mind.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj8MVrj6ISU&feature=plcp[/media]
[B]How DO you drive a Super Pershing?[/B]
"Don't feel compelled to rush"
oh okay so play it like every other shitty WoT player.
KV-1S needs to die in a fire.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
