Goon want so sell his T110 to buy back the T40 and get the T110E4 when 7.5 comes out. I suggested he get his ferdi back and get to JgPzE-100 when 7.5 comes out.
Agree for my suggestion, Tool for T110E4
[editline]24th July 2012[/editline]
Welp he bought T30
He traded his T110 for a T30?
This just in! Pak 40 confirmed for WoT!
[video=youtube;X55G7AdW01g]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X55G7AdW01g&feature=youtube_gdata[/video]
remember, goon sold all his tanks (including a lowe) just to buy upgrades for the churchill.
Goon, the epitome of bad decisions. I mean jesus christ.
[QUOTE=Amplar;36923229]remember, goon sold all his tanks (including a lowe) just to buy upgrades for the churchill.[/QUOTE]
It would have been easier just to light $60 on fire :v:
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;36923041]
Welp he bought T30[/QUOTE]
God damnit goon
Well, at least the T110E4 is basically a T110E5 without the tumor (actually a smaller one that is waaaay back on the turret), a better gun and limited traverse.
I'm getting the idea that the non-turreted TD line has a better end-tier.
[QUOTE=ze beaver;36923360]God damnit goon
Well, at least the T110E4 is basically a T110E5 without the tumor (actually a smaller one that is waaaay back on the turret), a better gun and limited traverse.[/QUOTE]
Which is why I'm getting it.
And I'm getting an M48 so that's a more maneuverable T110 anyway.
[img]http://puu.sh/LtTX[/img]
I see zero problems with this.
[QUOTE=goon165;36923637][img]http://puu.sh/LtTX[/img]
I see zero problems with this.[/QUOTE]
You'll have problems with the 155mm ground seeking shells though.
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
Oh and anyone care to post the BatChat's side armor layout?
I've dinged so much stuff with it, it's like it's 90% spaced armor with dingtanium coating.
[IMG]http://puu.sh/Lu3b[/IMG]
So apparently T110s can pen my mantlet + turret armor behind the mantlet (over 400 effective spaced), while my turret was angled, with AP.
No power creep at all.
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;36923790]So apparently T110s can pen my mantlet + turret armor behind the mantlet (over 400 effective spaced), while my turret was angled, with AP.
No power creep at all.[/QUOTE]
As a T110 driver, I can say that I have never done that.
Oh god I love the M4 so much. 17 victories, 5 defeats. The miniderp is perfect, in lower tier matches you can one shot a ton of tanks, and in higher tiers you are the perfect tank for support as you are mobile enough to flank heavies and armored enough to sit behind them and take potshots.
[QUOTE=paindoc;36924088]Oh god I love the M4 so much. 17 victories, 5 defeats. The miniderp is perfect, in lower tier matches you can one shot a ton of tanks, and in higher tiers you are the perfect tank for support as you are mobile enough to flank heavies and armored enough to sit behind them and take potshots.[/QUOTE]
mini
derp.
miniderp.
[B][I][U]the correct term is howitzer you mother fuck[/U][/I][/B]
[QUOTE=W0w00t;36924207]mini
derp.
miniderp.
[B][I][U]the correct term is howitzer you mother fuck[/U][/I][/B][/QUOTE]
Bold, italics, and underlined? the point is really solid there. Okay, howitzer, whatever. Does it really make a fucking difference what I call it?
[QUOTE=paindoc;36924316]Bold, italics, and underlined? the point is really solid there. Okay, howitzer, whatever. [B]Does it really make a fucking difference what I call it?[/B][/QUOTE]
[B][I][U]Yes it does matter very, very much.[/U][/I][/B]
[QUOTE=paindoc;36924316]Bold, italics, and underlined? the point is really solid there. Okay, howitzer, whatever. Does it really make a fucking difference what I call it?[/QUOTE]
I don't think FP likes using 'derp' at all.
[QUOTE=paindoc;36924316]Bold, italics, and underlined? the point is really solid there. Okay, howitzer, whatever. Does it really make a fucking difference what I call it?[/QUOTE]
[highlight] i will end you [/highlight]
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
the way you argue against it is like people who call the m4a3e2 jumbo the "easy two".
[QUOTE=W0w00t;36924383][highlight] i will end you [/highlight]
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
the way you argue against it is like people who call the m4a3e2 jumbo the "easy two".[/QUOTE]
I call it the [I]Mike Four Able Three Easy Two[/I].
I sincerely hope I am not right this time around, but WG's removal of the Sturmtiger along with the Brummbär from the tree is way too suspicious.
Here's my guess about the second German artillery line:
[B]T4[/B]
Heuschrecke 10
[T]http://i.imgur.com/AJIBk.jpg[/T]
The 105 on it should be more than enough for its tier, I don't think it needs a gun upgrade at all.
[B]T5[/B]
Brummbär
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/gHNE6.png[/IMG]
The 15cm on that thing fires the same ammo as the sIG 33 (Sturmpanzer/Bison gun) so it won't do much at T5, that's where I propose a very unrealistic upgrade.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/VBne6.jpg[/IMG]
That canon is basically WWI vintage, but considering WG's logic as far as artillery goes is "longer gun = more everything", it should make a decent upgrade.
Now the problem with the Brummbär is the fact is has way too much armor (100mm on the superstructure), balancing it out would be quite a problem.
[B]T6[/B]
The missing link. I can't find anything that would fit there, they'd either have to find some napkin tank on the Panther chassis or make one up.
[B]T7[/B]
That's where the horror begins, the Sturmpanzer Bär
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/aRGgU.jpg[/IMG]
305mm mortar (oh god even Himmelsdorf won't be safe), Tiger chassis and plenty of armor. It's slow (120 tons with a 700 HP engine) but if it hits you you're probably going to die.
[B]T8[/B]
Now that's where the fun really ends
380mm of pure "fuck you"
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/4MW3q.jpg[/IMG]
I think everyone knows everything about the Sturmtiger by now.
God help us if WG actually does this.
Tier 5-6 right here
[IMG]http://worldoftanks.com/dcont/fb/april_1st/panzerwerfer_42/1024_768.jpg[/IMG]
But thats a half-track.
I can only imagine all the rage if WG will introduce the rocket artillery.
[QUOTE=pawelte1;36924958]I can only imagine all the rage if WG will introduce the rocket artillery.[/QUOTE]
You fire one salvo and you wait 5 minutes for it to reload
m4 calliope - spam your rockets and then proceed to tear ass on the shell shocked pubbies
Can't have halftracks or AA-tanks but a deployed PAK40 driving around on its own is okay.
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE]
[B]T6[/B]
The missing link. I can't find anything that would fit there, they'd either have to find some napkin tank on the Panther chassis or make one up.
[/QUOTE]
I read somewhere about a heuschreke 15 project based on the panther chassis.
im tired of living on the same planet as the wot community
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
this actually makes me severely depressed and keeps me up at night
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
never in my life have i ever seen such a mass congregation of stupid people
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
how do they breathe
[editline]25th July 2012[/editline]
im not sure how to say this seriously but this actually depresses me heavily
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
