[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37696948]Wait. Guys. Idea.
What if they did with the E-100 what they did to the T30? Move the E-100 to some other TD tree, give it say 2300-2400 health, nerf its speed a bit, and buff the pen from 235 up to 250-255? Then they could make the E-75 the true version by taking the 128 off and giving it the 105 l/100 or whatever, and for T10 they could give us the E-90 with an improved 128, slightly more armor, and 2400 health?[/QUOTE]
i wouldnt complain
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37696948]Wait. Guys. Idea.
What if they did with the E-100 what they did to the T30? Move the E-100 to some other TD tree, give it say 2300-2400 health, nerf its speed a bit, and buff the pen from 235 up to 250-255? Then they could make the E-75 the true version by taking the 128 off and giving it the 105 l/100 or whatever, and for T10 they could give us the E-90 with an improved 128, slightly more armor, and 2400 health?[/QUOTE]
I don't like it. How about keep the E-100 a heavy, give its lower glacis its historical thickness(~same as the upper), and that's it. Maybe a health boost.
[editline]16th September 2012[/editline]
It'd be so much harder to pen the front, you'd be able to simply push forward with relative ease.
hey ;~D
[img]http://puu.sh/15VOC[/img]
I assume the Jagdpanther II is preferable to the Ferdinand, then?
[QUOTE=Pocket Medic;37697053]I assume the Jagdpanther II is preferable to the Ferdinand, then?[/QUOTE]
ye, fuck porsche and his shit tank design.
[QUOTE=Apache249;37697012]I don't like it. How about keep the E-100 a heavy, give its lower glacis its historical thickness(~same as the upper), and that's it. Maybe a health boost.
[editline]16th September 2012[/editline]
It'd be so much harder to pen the front, you'd be able to simply push forward with relative ease.[/QUOTE]
We all know wargaming would never buff the lower hull.
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37697081]We all know wargaming would never buff the lower hull.[/QUOTE]
I think of it more as a "we forget to include it earlier so we're putting some in now."
[QUOTE=Apache249;37697114]I think of it more as a "we forget to include it earlier so we're putting some in now."[/QUOTE]
It'd be more of a "We forgot to make the E-100 competitive"
What should I go for first with the IS?
Turret and then first 122mm or the 100mm first?
Holy god damn, the T110 series TDs are fucking phenomenal.
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
also come to the conclusion that the m48 is my favorite tank [b]ever[/b]
[QUOTE=Araknid;37697347]What should I go for first with the IS?
Turret and then first 122mm or the 100mm first?[/QUOTE]
Usually you don't want to get the 100mms, it's not worth it.
[QUOTE=acidcj;37695191]It's [URL="http://www.mediafire.com/view/?q2om5j87f72p4ya"]178 pages long[/URL][/QUOTE]
There is dedication
Then you have addiction
Then you have CLINICAL addiction
And then you have assburgers with a side of ADHD-sauce combined with a seasoning of freshly picked mental conditions
This guy goes a level beyond that
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37696948]Wait. Guys. Idea.
What if they did with the E-100 what they did to the T30? Move the E-100 to some other TD tree, give it say 2300-2400 health, nerf its speed a bit, and buff the pen from 235 up to 250-255? Then they could make the E-75 the true version by taking the 128 off and giving it the 105 l/100 or whatever, and for T10 they could give us the E-90 with an improved 128, slightly more armor, and 2400 health?[/QUOTE]
Sidegrade.
E-100 still tier ten, E-90 as second tier 10.
E-90 is slightly faster, has less armor, less health, and less raw alpha damage but has the 128 and 105 L/100, so you choose more pen, less alpha, Faster ROF or more alpha, mediocre pen with ok ROF.
Fucking done.
[img]http://localhostr.com/files/xhWEnLb/shot_024.jpg[/img]
[img]http://localhostr.com/files/n0vgxCz/shot_025.jpg[/img]
What have I done
It's your game telling you to not be a scrub and stop playing arty.
[img]http://localhostr.com/files/IWoZZyr/shot_026.jpg[/img]
ELC, YOU ARE SO SMALL
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=lintz;37697720]It's your game telling you to not be a scrub and stop playing arty.[/QUOTE]
I always wanted to see if you could battle bus with it so I got it on the test server
Oh fucking cool. WoT just brought my $1600 computer to its knees for the second time today. I happened to be holding W when it shat itself and memory leaked all over the place, so it drove me out into the middle of the field. 15 seconds later after ctr-alt-deleting and nothing happening it resumed, myself with now half health in this field. I was able to make it back with that much health, then while repositionioning behind cover to avoid the [B]four enemy artillery pieces[/B] (as is so fucking common in tier 4 and 5 matches), it decided to finally bring up the ctrl-alt-delete menu after I didn't need it, and when I got back in it glitched up and outright crashed.
So I restart WoT and it makes me load back into the game despite 14 out of 15 of our tanks, including me, being dead. 19 XP. I swear this game has assumed sentience among the clusterfuck of shitty code and given the sole motive to waste as much time as is physically possible.
[quote]Victory!
Battle: Ruinberg 17 September 2012 12:16:28
Vehicle: IS-3
Experience received: 6,264 (x3 for the first victory each day)
Credits received: 62,490
Battle Achievements: Top Gun[/quote]
Fuck yeah.
tier four is the [B][I][U]WORST[/U][/I][/B] tier in this entire piece of shit
everything about it is inconceivably stupid.
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
44% win ratio in the B1. WHY? Because in tier 4 matches the players around me are too stupid to win it on their own, and when the only skilled player on their team is in a tank too slow to get to the battle before they all kill themselves then it ends up with the skilled played versus the entire enemy team. And when it's not top tier it can't do [B]jack shit[/B]. It outright can't penetrate more than the sides of any given tier 5 in the game and the difference in overall power between all the tier 3s and 4s in the match "meant for you to kill" means they get quite literally [B]one or two shotted[/B] by all the top tiers.
Tier 4-5 is such a fucking fucked up shitty tier. Because of just that: the retardedly large margin of power between 4 and 5.
Just got 50k credits with my T14
feels good
[QUOTE=Zakhodit;37696321]Only Eight? There are 23 tanks in my garage. And 5 slots open.[/QUOTE]
70 tanks 15 slots open..
Cool! Kv-2 was in sale so I bought it.
First match with it in ages:
[quote]Victory!
Battle: Steppes 17 September 2012 12:51:23
Vehicle: KV-2
Experience received: 4,332 (x3 for the first victory each day)
Credits received: 35,190[/quote]
In the end of the match my team's IS said "Good work 25 second reload KV-2"
Forgot how fun this tank is, even though the reload speed is 25 secs.
[t]http://puu.sh/15XGb[/t]
these were better times...
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37697699][img]http://localhostr.com/files/xhWEnLb/shot_024.jpg[/img]
[img]http://localhostr.com/files/n0vgxCz/shot_025.jpg[/img]
What have I done[/QUOTE]
Reminds me of when I played company of heroes..
[IMG]http://screenshot.xfire.com/s/26224563-4.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;37697833]Fuck yeah.[/QUOTE]
why did i ever sell my IS-3
it's so good
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ihGl4.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Mbbird;37698092][t]http://puu.sh/15XGb[/t]
these were better times...[/QUOTE]
What? HOW?
[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37696948]Wait. Guys. Idea.
What if they did with the E-100 what they did to the T30? Move the E-100 to some other TD tree, give it say 2300-2400 health, nerf its speed a bit, and buff the pen from 235 up to 250-255? Then they could make the E-75 the true version by taking the 128 off and giving it the 105 l/100 or whatever, and for T10 they could give us the E-90 with an improved 128, slightly more armor, and 2400 health?[/QUOTE]
The E-75 really doesn't need a buff.
Now for the E-90, this thing is even worse than the T28P.
It's pure anime bullshit, it's not even close to a napkin tank. It's also very, very ugly and makes no sense at all from a design standpoint.
It's even worse than Hitler.
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
Wait it's the "E-79" that's anime bullshit
Still, the E-90 doesn't exist
whats a "anime bullshit"
[editline]17th September 2012[/editline]
is that a good thing or a bad thing
Hah.
[quote]
Artillery always had the issue of not being able to aim past the red line limiting the battle arena, allowing fairly arty invulnerable positions on some maps (Mines).
Now, in 0.8.0, WG "improved" that old issue by allowing tanks to drive a little bit past the red line, but still preventing arty from aiming there:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/ESe0X.jpg[/img]
(that guy had the right idea - he stayed behind the line all match - but should have turned his frontal armour towards the enemy)
Eagerly awaiting company battles or maybe clan wars where one team goes arty heavy and the other team simply retreats behind the red line. Also a very good position to place your own arty to prevent being countered.
[/quote]
PzKpfw VIB Tiger II vs. VK 4502 (P) Ausf. A ?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
