World of Tanks - SIEMA PL? - Games

[QUOTE=Araknid;37893773]Ah fuck it, I'll apply aswell if its not too late. [editline]edasd[/editline] I hope this won't be a mistake.[/QUOTE] You already started playing, it has been downhill ever since. What's another mistake gonna do now.

[QUOTE=Goblin_5;37893886]You already started playing, it has been downhill ever since. What's another mistake gonna do now.[/QUOTE] I regained my old 300 gold I spent on camouflage for my old pre-patch KV-2. Spent 150 of it blinging my T2 racecar absolutely the fuck up [img]http://i46.tinypic.com/n66u4x.png[/img] [img]http://i48.tinypic.com/rhl4ea.png[/img] [img]http://i48.tinypic.com/2zreplh.png[/img] No regrets whatsoever when I'm styling cruise control straight towards their artillery

[QUOTE=Araknid;37893773]Ah fuck it, I'll apply aswell if its not too late. [editline]edasd[/editline] I hope this won't be a mistake.[/QUOTE] You and 9300 others :v:

I'll go ahead and try both guns, after I free xp out of that barn of a stock turret of course.

[QUOTE=MadCatMkII;37892560]So does anyone know if the 3001p can actually [i]reach[/i] 60km/h with its top engine?[/QUOTE] Downhill, yes. Over flat terrain it can get up to 50+ though. Fully upgraded the VK3001P isn't actually that terrible, just getting there is horribly painful.

Oh lord, I just hit 20mln credits and I still don't know what to spend it on. Will be even more when I finish and sell the M103, JagdTiger, E50, T30 and T54. (and the T95 but I don't think I'll ever finish that :v:) [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/bJy2O.png[/IMG]

Bowser I am both impressed and disgusted in you.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;37894849]Downhill, yes. Over flat terrain it can get up to 50+ though. Fully upgraded the VK3001P isn't actually that terrible, just getting there is horribly painful.[/QUOTE] Even fully upgraded though, it is massive for a medium tank and has absolutely no armor concentration to speak of, being penned by tier 5 tanks frontally with little effort. It was the worst tank I've ever played. It's funny because the Tiger(P) that comes after it is actually pretty damn good.

Also, what happened to the idea of changing the FPEU logo into something better looking? That plastic badge still annoys me. I want something simple that doesn't lose all it's detail because of the downscaling.

[QUOTE=Bowser_nl;37896290]Oh lord, I just hit 20mln credits and I still don't know what to spend it on. Will be even more when I finish and sell the M103, JagdTiger, E50, T30 and T54. (and the T95 but I don't think I'll ever finish that :v:) [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/bJy2O.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] daym, only got 4mil myself

[QUOTE=FlakAttack;37896321]Even fully upgraded though, it is massive for a medium tank and has absolutely no armor concentration to speak of, being penned by tier 5 tanks frontally with little effort. It was the worst tank I've ever played. It's funny because the Tiger(P) that comes after it is actually pretty damn good.[/QUOTE] The Tiger P is also quite a bit smaller than the 3001P which makes no fucking sense at all. In fact, it feels as if the Tiger P is way too small in-game. Just compare it to the IS-7/IS-3, IRL it was even bigger than the Tiger H.

[QUOTE=FlakAttack;37896321]it is massive for a medium tank and has absolutely no armor concentration to speak of[/QUOTE] Such is life as German medium.

Joined a match on the SEA Server First thing I see Biggdick (PzJg 1): APE YAH k

[IMG]http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/4868/ee4qvwfp.jpg[/IMG]

Worst fucking team ever. EVERYONE apart from me and my buddy got under 200xp and 7 of our cunt team got under 100xp. 4 tanks literally drove to suicide, for christ sake, get off my team!

[QUOTE=goon165;37897406][IMG]http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/4868/ee4qvwfp.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] is that seriously a catapult?

[QUOTE=NoDachi;37897486]is that seriously a catapult?[/QUOTE] I think it's a holder for this: [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Churchill_VII_AVRE_With_Fascine.jpg[/img] Or something else. I can't imagen the Brits using cataputs to attack the germans :v: [editline]3rd October 2012[/editline] Some Tank expert here will probably identify it soon.

Here's a fun fact [B]The engine of the Churchill was never replaced or upgraded so the Heavy Churchill had a maximum ground speed of 20km/h[/B] I am the slow.

[QUOTE=Bowser_nl;37897543]I think it's a holder for this: [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Churchill_VII_AVRE_With_Fascine.jpg[/img] [/QUOTE] Never let the truth get in the way of brilliant fiction. It's a catapult to make the germans go kataputt

[quote]On the Mark VII, the hull front armour was made up of a lower angled piece of 5.5 in (140 mm), a nearly flat 2.25 in (57 mm) plate and a vertical 6 inch plate. The hull sides, were for the most part, 3.75 in (95 mm). The rear was 2 in (51 mm) and the hull top 0.525 in (13.3 mm). The turret of the Mark VII was 6 in (150 mm) to the front and 3.75 in (95 mm) for the other sides. The turret roof was 0.79 (20 mm) thick. Plate was specified as IT 80, the cast sections as IT 90.[8][/quote] [B]JESUS CHRIST HOW HORRIFYING[/B]

[QUOTE=goon165;37897964][B]JESUS CHRIST HOW HORRIFYING[/B][/QUOTE] I hope that is what WG is gonna add. They did say the Brits would have armor as one of their strong points (and rate of fire) so it seems fitting.

[QUOTE=Orkel;37898001]I hope that is what WG is gonna add. They did say the Brits would have armor as one of their strong points (and rate of fire) so it seems fitting.[/QUOTE] [B]It's tier six and it has a QF 75[/B]

[QUOTE=goon165;37898015][B]It's tier six and it has a QF 75[/B][/QUOTE] Better prepare my rape-stick.

I suddenly don't want to play late war Germany in historical battles anymore.

so i guess players dont move after firing when they play arty they sure do get upset when i counter arty them they say i'm cheap :v:

I'm looking forward to the British heavies playstyle. Big slow bricks with little rapid guns. [editline]3rd October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=goon165;37897964][B]JESUS CHRIST HOW HORRIFYING[/B][/QUOTE] You also got to remember it was as slow as a t95.

I'm ok with slow. it also means that it's a stable gun platform and will fire more or less fully accurate on the move.

[QUOTE=goon165;37898181]I'm ok with slow. it also means that it's a stable gun platform and will fire more or less fully accurate on the move.[/QUOTE] Don't count on that. WG is gonna find a way to put huge downsides to that massive armor and I'm betting lowest health, shitty on the move acc and low damage guns and bad camo. [editline]3rd October 2012[/editline] OR bad accuracy overall.

Well all of the other british tanks so far have really good fire on the move accuracy

[QUOTE=Orkel;37898226] OR bad accuracy overall.[/QUOTE] [img]http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/6683/worldoftanks20121003154.jpg[/img] Nothing new here.