It's not that bad considering if you miss a shot its not the end of the world :v:
[QUOTE=NoDachi;37898395]It's not that bad considering if you miss a shot its not the end of the world :v:[/QUOTE]
by the time you comprehend that the shot has missed or dinged you're already halfway reloaded.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37898001]I hope that is what WG is gonna add. They did say the Brits would have armor as one of their strong points (and rate of fire) so it seems fitting.[/QUOTE]
Well, it is the one on the tech tree
[QUOTE=Orkel;37898226]Don't count on that. WG is gonna find a way to put huge downsides to that massive armor and I'm betting lowest health, shitty on the move acc and low damage guns and bad camo.
OR bad accuracy overall.[/QUOTE]
British tanks will have great on the move accuracy, something which they were well known for. On higher tier tanks, like the centurion, you had some of the best stabilization for its time, while on lower ones the British made use of a few things to allow the guns to be fired with relative accuracy on the move. For instance, the Crusader had a rubber bad connect to the gun which the operator could rest his shoulder upon, to help reduce vibrations and the effect of bumps while one the move. Benefit of a small caliber gun is that they are much easier to control, and most of the British guns are small caliber.
The only real downfall WG will slap on them is the overall shitty top speed and naff damage.
[QUOTE=NoDachi;37898525]The only real downfall WG will slap on them is the overall shitty top speed and naff damage.[/QUOTE]
which will be actually compensated properly this time by having armor that is effective at it's tiers so actually meaning something, and having machine gun cannons on everything
Ahh ELC AMX is so fun, such a wicked gun. Just had a 4k + xp game :D
[QUOTE=NoDachi;37898525]The only real downfall WG will slap on them is the overall shitty top speed and naff damage.[/QUOTE]
Infantry tanks it is to be expected, but cruiser tanks, hell no.
cruiser tanks will prolly play similarly to the m7, but with less mobility
[QUOTE=Ogopogo;37898653]Infantry tanks it is to be expected, but cruiser tanks, hell no.[/QUOTE]
Wasn't talking about cruiser tanks.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37898668]cruiser tanks will prolly play similarly to the m7, but with less mobility[/QUOTE]
Well the crusader is likely to be faster than the M7, and the cromwell and Comet will probably be like the T20. Oh yes, and the cromwell (if the devs don't change it) will have depression of 12.5 degrees.
um
[img]http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4110/whateu.jpg[/img]
[B]UM[/B]
yes, that's a scout medal
In a Churchill.
[QUOTE=Ogopogo;37898701]Well the crusader is likely to be faster than the M7, and the cromwell and Comet will probably be like the T20. Oh yes, and the cromwell (if the devs don't change it) will have depression of 12.5 degrees.[/QUOTE]
Think the Comet will play on the lines of a T23 actually, that was a pure medium gem...rip.
[QUOTE=O'Neil;37898912]Think the Comet will play on the lines of a T23 actually, that was a pure medium gem...rip.[/QUOTE]
Wasn't it essentially a T20?
[QUOTE=Raidyr;37899179]Wasn't it essentially a T20?[/QUOTE]
Far from it my boy, it was agile and deadly, such a swift machine and quite angelic. It may of had slightly less speed then the T20 but it could turn fairly well, the only issue It had was the ammo rack would always get hit.
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/939257134447904772/2C64508593508B0876C030F89ADC39E0B1BBE549/[/img]
[img]http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/939257134447906873/A436CF98DA5939844B8E96A7ECE5BE17530A9BE2/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/939257134447908895/3483CC2F022CFAD59CD53B847D53A70C38AB7C87/[/img]
I love physics
into the drink arty fiends
Temp bans due to account transfers.
Instead of goregeous on EU I am now HynemSmasher on SEA.
Oh and pic of me in my Patton on a 12 kill game:
[img]http://www.gizmology.net/images/tank14.jpg[/img]
So I met this guy who put camo on his LTrack.
I noticed that after I was pointing out how stupid he was and bad at the game he was.
I say "I can't believe people waste silver on camo for tier I tanks"
"i used gold dummy"
my brain fried a bit
[QUOTE=Saza;37901063]
I say "I can't believe people waste silver on camo for tier I tanks"
"i used gold dummy"[/QUOTE]
I don't even know anymore.
Rebought my sexy Jagdpanther. No regrets.
[QUOTE=O'Neil;37899222]Far from it my boy, it was agile and deadly, such a swift machine and quite angelic. It may of had slightly less speed then the T20 but it could turn fairly well, the only issue It had was the ammo rack would always get hit.[/QUOTE]
Best way of putting it (at least for me) was that it was a T20 with the speed of a maneuverability of a chaffee. Seriously, it could circle other mediums.
this picture won first prize with 5,000 gold in wargayming's rageface contest
[img]http://www.kloby.ic.cz/malickosti/rage.jpg[/img]
brb killing self
Honestly probably one of the better ones when you have the bar set so low as to have a rageface contest.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37901435]this picture won first prize with 5,000 gold in wargayming's rageface contest
[img]http://www.kloby.ic.cz/malickosti/rage.jpg[/img]
brb killing self[/QUOTE]
xDDXDDDDDDDDDXDDDDDDD SO FANNI
fucking t14 kept nudging me while i tried to shoot some sau-40
[QUOTE=gunnars1;37901958][video=youtube;eQirR3I8kno]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQirR3I8kno&feature=youtu.be[/video]
[IMG]http://i49.tinypic.com/2n6g03n.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
It's a shame the GW E is basically invulnerable to this.
Unless we get a convoy of Maus to push it.
Honestly if you dont notice someone pushing you into a river I think you deserve that to happen.
Also that rageface contest winner.
Fuck Everything
[img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/shot_0292.jpg[/img]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
