If they put it in it better have like a fucking extra long 150 with 500 pen and 750 damage at 7rpm and then be completely inpenetrable frontally because it's going to get completely fucked by anything even remotely mobile with the agility that the Maus has
hey, so the kv-1 / 122 is actually really fun now
this won't be a hard 20k to the kv-1s at all, unless my ping decides it's going to be weird all suddenly
it'll be all hey I'm your ping and I'm 50, but now I'm 600, back to 50, up to 90, now I'm 280, etc.
I love that ALL the loading tips on SEA have to do with account security.
And it's impossible to save your login/pass (without modified xml).
[QUOTE=goon165;37954304][img]http://www.panzerfux.de/panzerfux_e/prodpic/Projekt-Panzerjaeger-Jagdmaus-ATM-80129_b_2.JPG[/img]
welp.
inbefore long 15cm pak.[/QUOTE]
gibe pls
[QUOTE=goon165;37954599]The back
[img]http://home.arcor.de/hlmodelle/Gastbereich/WMueller/Jagdmaus/Jagdmaus-03.jpeg[/img]
chassis looks extended.[/QUOTE]
It still doesn't look long enough.
The Maus' engine was insanely huge and it took humongous amounts of fuel to give it a range greater than 500 meters. Just think about it, the King Tiger did 162 [b]meters[/b] for every litre of gasoline in it, that's for a 23 litre V12 menwhile the Maus had a 44 litre V12.
Dr. Porsche was fucking insane, as much as Christie even though their designs were diametrically opposed
good god that's about .3 mpg if i did my math right (at 1 am woo)
what are you doing german tanks
[QUOTE=Saza;37955563]good god that's about .3 mpg if i did my math right (at 1 am woo)
what are you doing german tanks[/QUOTE]
Fuel consumption is always a problem with gasoline engines, the only reason Germany used them early in the war was their much higher power over diesel engines but later on it was because you could synthetize gas out of almost anything.
Gasoline engines should have been phased out mid war but most nations just didn't want to add more complexity to their supply lines so you ended up with Zippo Shermans (all the diesel ones went to the Brits). Even the Ruskies managed to design an easily mass produced diesel engine that was moderately reliable and could push out 500-600 HP, yet the Americans only managed to design a 36 cylinder gas monster they stuck in the poor little Sherman (oh chrysler you so silly with your multibank engine...).
[editline]8th October 2012[/editline]
Oh and it wasn't just a German thing, the early M48 had insane range problems, just a little over 100 kilometers with a full ~700 litres tank. I'm fairly sure it's even worse than the KT.
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37955821]
[editline]8th October 2012[/editline]
Oh and it wasn't just a German thing, the early M48 had insane range problems, [B]just a little over 100 kilometers with a full ~700 litres tank[/B]. I'm fairly sure it's even worse than the KT.[/QUOTE]
holy shiiiitttt
[QUOTE=Mbbird;37955866]holy shiiiitttt[/QUOTE]
Germans and Americans have obscene problems with longevity with everything on the tanks they made.
Tube life being another thing, the gun on the M103 had a life of [B]250 rounds[/B] before it needed to be replaced because it was deemed too hazardous to fire. The German KPZ-70 (the MBT-70 with an conventional 120mm) had pretty much the same issue, the Abrams still has problems TODAY with tube life.
I think we should just give up and license Challenger 2 and fund the mythical Challenger 3 development.
[QUOTE=paindoc;37951976]Damn, I am going to miss this little tank. The Hetzer is awesome once you get the hang of it[/QUOTE]
[img]http://puu.sh/14nxJ[/img]
It's a nice little collection so far :kiddo:
I'd keep more tanks but I'm too peasant to buy new garage slots.
[editline]fuck[/editline]
World of shitty pubs.
Playing a standard match, everyone on my team just charges to their deaths.
If you ever do get gold to spend, garage slots is probably the most useful thing you can spend it on.
Hell, if you don't want to invest any real money it might even be worth waiting for one of those twitter quizzes.
I have like 30 slots from abusing the HELL out of the t127 promo
IS-3 looks good but the price makes me cry.
[QUOTE=Araknid;37957227]IS-3 looks good but the price makes me cry.[/QUOTE]
the placement and size of the ammunition racks will make you cry too.
[QUOTE=goon165;37957241]the placement and size of the ammunition racks will make you cry too.[/QUOTE]
Safe Stowage and Wet Ammo Rack.
Honestly, I think it would be nice if crew didn't get much of a penalty if they were in a vehicle similar to their original one.
For example, an M4 sherman crew in an Easy Eight would get a penalty, but not as great of a penalty as they would get in a tank completely different to the M4.
Same with the Pz35t crew in a Pz38t and that sort of shit.
Sent an application to the facepunch clan, was it denied? Sent it a few days ago.
[QUOTE=O'Neil;37957427]Sent an application to the facepunch clan, was it denied? Sent it a few days ago.[/QUOTE]
I would assume no one checks applications unless you tell them.
poo
No fp clan on the SEA server.
[editline]asd[/editline]
E8 is awesome.
Hey guys, I'm using a M3 Lee and its been hard, really hard so I can't wait to get the T1 heavy!
[QUOTE=Toyokunari;37957757]Hey guys, I'm using a M3 Lee and its been hard, really hard so I can't wait to get the T1 heavy![/QUOTE]
o god pls go E2>M6 instead
[QUOTE=Toyokunari;37957757]Hey guys, I'm using a M3 Lee and its been hard, really hard so I can't wait to get the T1 heavy![/QUOTE]
Use it as a TD.
Also thinking of getting the KV-13 through my T-34/85, worth it? or is T-43 better?
[QUOTE=Araknid;37957766]Use it as a TD.
Also thinking of getting the KV-13 through my T-34/85, worth it? or is T-43 better?[/QUOTE]
KV-13 is pretty much better, but unless you want to swap lines, it's really not worth it. You'll have to come back to the T-43 if you want the T-44 anyways.
m3 Lee is fun tank. Use it as a second-line sniper early game and brawl later into the game - its adaquate armor and great manoeverability/pen/dps will have you covered.
[QUOTE=Ooooooops;37958050][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/awSKr.jpg[/IMG]
Rule, Britannia![/QUOTE]
is there any good features to the matildaBP?
[QUOTE=Saza;37958407]is there any good features to the matildaBP?[/QUOTE]
rate of fire and health
[QUOTE=Orkel;37958520]rate of fire and health[/QUOTE]
So basically the Ram is better.
I just started playing a couple days ago and got myself a PzIV. I'm starting to regret not going for a KV-1 instead. Those things kick my ass. I hope the PzIV branch gets better.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.