[QUOTE=Apache249;37006000]That Conquerer is looking awesome. What is the British tier 10 heavy?[/QUOTE]
FV215(133) armed with the QF 5.25 inch gun. The tank itself is semi created by the devs, based around the FV215b (the one with the 183mm) save armed with a more traditional gun. It is not to far a stretch to imagine that the 5.25 inch could have been considered at time for the FV215, a tank designed to be able to defeat any armor at any range. Likely when they realized HESH rounds had better penetration at the edge of their range, and large ones would destroy any armor, they moved to the 183mm.
So in short, it is a modified conqueror.
[editline]30th July 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Orkel;37006575]British tanks delayed.[/QUOTE]
Anyone surprised?
[QUOTE=Zombii;37006400]I do think it's moving slightly in the right direction. Maybe they've noticed that whenever they make the game better, people spend more money on it.[/QUOTE]
Nah, they're just realizing that they have serious competition coming (MechWarrior Online) and they know it's going to hurt.
WoB alpha starting this winter.
How come 7.5 update is already out on the russian server but the test server is still running?
God the T110 bounces shit like mad. Had a T-54 and patton trading shots with me frontally. They couldn't seem to hit the cupola, so they switched to HE. Still very little damage.
[QUOTE=Orkel;37006840]WoB alpha starting this winter.[/QUOTE]
[i][b]yes[/i][/b]
[QUOTE=Doom14;37006087]Is it just me or does this game finally seem like it's moving on the right path?
It's baby steps, but we're seeing Russian things get nerfed (even if slightly) and Germans getting tiny buffs (even after the wake of the frontal transmission fiasco.)
A man can dream of the day when they remove artillery and refund us all the XP/silver we put into them. :v:[/QUOTE]
They will find a way to fuck everything up like they always do
[editline]30th July 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Orkel;37006575]British tanks delayed.[/QUOTE]
I'm expecting the whole patch to be delayed until next year with half the content originally "planned"
[QUOTE=Azaz3l;37006974]How come 7.5 update is already out on the russian server but the test server is still running?[/QUOTE]
Same happened with 7.4
[quote]Defeat
Battle: Karelia Monday, July 30, 2012 5:12:18 PM
Vehicle: Type 59
Experience received: 1,207
Credits received: 118,885[/quote]
[b][u]CREDITS.[/u][/b]
[QUOTE=Zombii;37007325][i][b]yes[/i][/b][/QUOTE]
[img]http://dennisandrewsart.co.uk/gallery/F_battlecruiser_hms_hood.jpg[/img]
You'll all see :c
I can't wait to see the glitchy ship physics!
[QUOTE=Bonde;37008042]I can't wait to see the glitchy ship physics![/QUOTE]
Physics don't worry me as much as the spotting system :v:
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37008074]Physics don't worry me as much as the spotting system :v:[/QUOTE]
enemy aircraft carrier disappears behind wave
What the dick people are penning me [I]through the mantlet[/I] on my T30!
You should be able to see any tank at any distance, but only be able to highlight it, view it's health and so on if it's spotted. Only issue is that with the WoT community, that would translate to tonnes of friendly fire because you wouldn't be able to identify who it was. Also, arty would jizz over it, but in the ideal world with a spotting overhaul, arty is removed / severely nerfed.
[QUOTE=ayaki;37008265]What the dick people are penning me [I]through the mantlet[/I] on my T30![/QUOTE]
I guess the mantlets are still broken?
[QUOTE=FlakAttack;37008350]I guess the mantlets are still broken?[/QUOTE]
Something is broken, but it's not mantlet themselves.
My T34 keeps on dinging everything but my M103 keeps getting penetrated right through the mantlet by those damn 128 L/55s.
[QUOTE=ze beaver;37006163]What Russian nerfs?
They don't even need nerfs, the IS-7 is balanced enough, so is the IS-4 (hell it's getting a buff in 7.5) and the 704/268 are glorified paper turds.
Meanwhile they're fucking up the French light/medium lines and won't give back my BatChat's mobility.[/QUOTE]
I had nothing wrong with the IS-7 or IS-4. Or any of those. It was more obnoxious having SU-85s run around doing 400 damage with a lucky shot or T-34-85s penning my VIII heavies frontally. That aside, I can't comment on the Batshit. I don't own one. The rest of the French line looks less like fucking with and more like "We're moving shit to the tier of MM it gets -AND- giving it HP buffs along the way."
The only thing I'm left biffed on is the ISU's 850 damage gun in a game all about alpha damage - but I digress. The real nipple-twerker is the new unflankable French TDs. Past the ARL V39, they all turn so god damn fast that I can't even get around them in a Lorraine. Combine that with decent (225mm+ effective at VIII) armor and they're tough little shits. I'm just glad their damage is low.
All this rambling aside - naw. I'm pretty good with the game now. I'm sure the new Xs will fuck everything up; but the only thing I'm left really hating with a passion is artillery. And well -you just sorta get use to it. I'm slowly learning to let the lemmings go first.
[QUOTE=Doom14;37008413]I had nothing wrong with the IS-7 or IS-4. Or any of those. It was more obnoxious having SU-85s run around doing 400 damage with a lucky shot or T-34-85s penning my VIII heavies frontally. That aside, I can't comment on the Batshit. I don't own one. The rest of the French line looks less like fucking with and more like "We're moving shit to the tier of MM it gets -AND- giving it HP buffs along the way."
The only thing I'm left biffed on is the ISU's 850 damage gun in a game all about alpha damage - but I digress. The real nipple-twerker is the new unflankable French TDs. Past the ARL V39, they all turn so god damn fast that I can't even get around them in a Lorraine. Combine that with decent (225mm+ effective at VIII) armor and they're tough little shits. I'm just glad their damage is low.
[/QUOTE]
Well when I say "fucked up" the line I mean the fact they reverted their decision to give the AMX 13 a 105mm gun along with nerfing the BatChat's only good aspect :v:
I hope you haven't seen the Foch 155 yet, it's even worse. It's just as fast as the current Foch except it has the potential to deal 2550 damage to you in less than 15 seconds. If you meet one in anything else than a Maus you might as well just exit the game.
So I played against M4 and M4A2E4 in my KV-1/S (both). And I am confused and terrified by the fact that I cannot penetrate/do damage to them at all. It's a tiny little medium tank that even my T-34 can set on fire on a good day - and yet KV's a powerless against it.
[IMG_thumb]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/558696551001055004/261C148F57011882D4D98F2BC7620F3613EEBE90/1024x768.resizedimage[/IMG_thumb]
17 shots against that thing. Half bounced off, half penned with no damage.
What is this shit?
In other news, T-34 is okay for peasant grinding.
[QUOTE=gufu;37008625]So I played against M4 and M4A2E4 in my KV-1/S (both). And I am confused and terrified by the fact that I cannot penetrate/do damage to them at all. It's a tiny little medium tank that even my T-34 can set on fire on a good day - and yet KV's a powerless against it.
[IMG_thumb]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/558696551001055004/261C148F57011882D4D98F2BC7620F3613EEBE90/1024x768.resizedimage[/IMG_thumb]
17 shots against that thing. Half bounced off, half penned with no damage.
What is this shit?
In other news, T-34 is okay for peasant grinding.[/QUOTE]
What the heck dude, what cannon did you use and where did you shoot?
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;37008692]What the heck dude, what cannon did you use and where did you shoot?[/QUOTE]
Treads, Front Visor, Turret.
Yes, terrible targets, but still.
I used 76 mm S-54. Then I said screw it, and got the derp gun, instead.
[QUOTE=gufu;37009009]Treads, Front Visor, Turret.
Yes, terrible targets, but still.
I used 76 mm S-54. Then I said screw it, and got the derp gun, instead.[/QUOTE]
The derp on KV-1 is a must.
And on KV-1s you shouldn't have any problem penning those.
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;37009233]The derp on KV-1 is a must.
And on KV-1s you shouldn't have any problem penning those.[/QUOTE]
Should I really spend the extra creds and get the derp? You sound very convinced about it.
[QUOTE=Billiam;37009393]Should I really spend the extra creds and get the derp? You sound very convinced about it.[/QUOTE]
Yeah it's probably the best gun on the KV-1.
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;37009426]Yeah it's probably the best gun on the KV-1.[/QUOTE]
I'm so used to the German accuracy. .57 is just unheard of for me.
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;37009233]The derp on KV-1 is a must.
And on KV-1s you shouldn't have any problem penning those.[/QUOTE]
The problem with non-derp KV-1s is not penetration - it's that penetration doesn't do ANY damage.
[QUOTE=gufu;37009480]The problem with non-derp KV-1s is not penetration - it's that penetration doesn't do ANY damage.[/QUOTE]
Really now.
Take a look at the best cannon for the KV-1s and say that again.
Something is very wrong with the American mantlets.
I just penetrated a T32's and did full damage, what's going on here?
[QUOTE=Cataclysmic_47;37009521]Something is very wrong with the American mantlets.
I just penetrated a T32's and did full damage, what's going on here?[/QUOTE]
stock turret?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.