World of Tanks - SIEMA PL? - Games

[QUOTE=Bowser_nl;37148480]Ugh, more disgusting Chinese pieces of shit to pollute the battlefields. WarGayming said they would keep the 62 Chinese server only, but once again they don't keep their word in favour of more money.[/QUOTE] And the 59 is back. WG confirmed for running low on resources(vodka) after buying BigWorld.

[QUOTE=Bowser_nl;37148480]Ugh, more disgusting Chinese pieces of shit to pollute the battlefields. WarGayming said they would keep the 62 Chinese server only, but once again they don't keep their word in favour of more money.[/QUOTE] Check out the stats and attributes of the 62, its a Light tank intended to be a Scout as seen by its shitty battle-tier levels, and it doesn't really have that much armour at all. It has a D-85 gun thats not even as good as some of the USSR DT-85M versions. I'd rather fight one of those than a Type 59 any day. Oh, and it goes 50 km/h, has 690 HP and weighs only 20 tons. Im definitely not arguing for it, just saying that its bullshit is trivial vs. the 59.

[QUOTE=Gunar;37148504]Check out the stats and attributes of the 62, its a Light tank intended to be a Scout as seen by its shitty battle-tier levels, and it doesn't really have that much armour at all. It has a D-85 gun thats not even as good as some of the USSR DT-85M versions. I'd rather fight one of those than a Type 59 any day. Oh, and it goes 50 km/h, has 690 HP and weighs only 20 tons. Im definitely not arguing for it, just saying that its bullshit is trivial vs. the 59.[/QUOTE] People also said the same sort of "it's not that bad" about the T59. I will wonder how you feel when 12 62's fuck up your matchmaking and you get swarmed by 5 of the fuckers, because that's exactly what the 59 did.

I considered buying a 59 for a fraction of a second, but then I realized I have integrity and no money.

Okay, do I want a t59? I really think I do. KV-5 got shafted by MM2.0 t59 or supapershing? This work will net me money I crave op premium tanks

[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;37148881]Okay, do I want a t59? I really think I do. KV-5 got shafted by MM2.0 t59 or supapershing? This work will net me money I crave op premium tanks[/QUOTE] Type 59 is alright. Can't pen much, is slow, doesn't have too much gun depression, but manages to be okay. Has good turret armor, okay accuracy. Doesn't make a heck of a lot of money like it used to, but it does alright. [editline]9th August 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=ze beaver;37147533][B]BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE[/B] The M1932, it's older so it should be worse am I right? [B]you're wrong, so very very wrong[/B] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/C4MZe.jpg[/IMG] That thing right here is basically a BT-2, a BT-2 with an even crazier Spanish engine and a 75mm howitzer in the hull. 700 HP for 5 tons, 140 HP/ton and the entire thing is [I]spaced armor[/I]. Did I mention it does [B]120 MILES PER HOUR[/B] (193 kph) on wheels?[/QUOTE] Haha if what you say is true that thing has more horsepower / ton than a (previous generation) Honda Civic Si Impressive [editline]f[/editline] So a tank from 1932 might play something like this (similar hp/ton to the car in this video) [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMbaZzeKJC8[/media]

I felt bored so I bumrushed the enemy base in my Wespe got one kill, one damage, and 6% captured of the enemy base before we won who says artillery is for cowards, anyway [editline]10th August 2012[/editline] [t]http://puu.sh/Q5Af[/t] my adoring fans~

I accidentally researched the turret on my E-50 instead of the tracks first the pain continues..

US community manager says that "arty shells flipping tanks[I] probably won't be in the[/I] [I]first iteration of physics[/I]" Implies that it will be added in one of the future updates Sturmtigers' 380mm rockets flipping Mauses, coming in 2015, fellow tankers

[QUOTE=Orkel;37150727]US community manager says that "arty shells flipping tanks[I] probably won't be in the[/I] [I]first iteration of physics[/I]" Implies that it will be added in one of the future updates Sturmtigers' 380mm rockets flipping Mauses coming in 2015, fellow tankers[/QUOTE] It would be funny if artillery shells did more kinetic energy damage than raw tank damage Imagine hitting a T-50-2 at full speed with an S-51 shell and then its dead husk flying across the map

[QUOTE=Orkel;37150727]US community manager says that "arty shells flipping tanks[I] probably won't be in the[/I] [I]first iteration of physics[/I]" Implies that it will be added in one of the future updates Sturmtigers' 380mm rockets flipping Mauses, coming in 2015, fellow tankers[/QUOTE] Arty splashes T-50-2 moving at full speed. T-50-2 suddenly becomes a Sidewinder missile.

t-50-2s are already sidewinders

Foch is glorious tank, only 280k until the 155.

[QUOTE=fishyfish777;37148914]Type 59 is alright. Can't pen much, is slow, doesn't have too much gun depression, but manages to be okay. Has good turret armor, okay accuracy. Doesn't make a heck of a lot of money like it used to, but it does alright.[/quote] The gun on the SP and the Type are almost exactly the same. And it's not a great gun but it gets the job done. SP is slow. Type is slow to get moving but once it does it keeps its speed even while turning. As for money, I don't know where this belief that it makes less now comes from but I still average more in my type (~60K) than in my Lowe (~45K) Granted I'm not a very good Heavy Tank driver but I've made over 100K several times in my Type. My best is 179K. And after 7.5 nothing has changed. Pulled 120K. Clearly I need screen shots, and don't have them. I'll take some and post them if you like. [IMG]http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/8381/shot004sze.jpg[/IMG] I'd take the Type if it were me. If I'm going to be big and slow and have lots of armor I may as well buy a Lowe. EDIT: I thought I might add that I am terrible at this game. If I can do this, well, a good player will do better.

[quote=forum question]The top speed of a T-50-2 is 71-72km/h, even downhill (limited by transmission speed). Will tanks now go faster downhill in 8.0? Or are you talking about the closing speed between two tanks during a collision?[/quote] [quote=Vallter]Yes, with new physics you will be able to exceed speed limits of vehicles.[/quote]

I want to do M8a1 backflips.

[QUOTE=Zakhodit;37150867]The gun on the SP and the Type are almost exactly the same. And it's not a great gun but it gets the job done. SP is slow. Type is slow to get moving but once it does it keeps its speed even while turning. As for money, I don't know where this belief that it makes less now comes from but I still average more in my type (~60K) than in my Lowe (~45K) Granted I'm not a very good Heavy Tank driver but I've made over 100K several times in my Type. My best is 179K. And after 7.5 nothing has changed. Pulled 120K. Clearly I need screen shots, and don't have them. I'll take some and post them if you like. [IMG]http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/8381/shot004sze.jpg[/IMG] I'd take the Type if it were me. If I'm going to be big and slow and have lots of armor I may as well buy a Lowe.[/QUOTE] I meant that before the matchmaking was fixed on the 59, it'd regularly pull 70k non-premium matches and even 100k non-premium matches easily. I dunno why, but I have trouble pulling 50-60k anymore when on the other hand my IS-3 has a way better win and damage ratio despite being slower. Maybe I'm just horrible at mediums because I'd far prefer the T34 / Lowe to the T59.

T-50-2's replacement confirmed. It will keep similar mobility as the current T-50-2. Mototank MT-25 [img]http://wotbase.ru/wp-content/uploads/25502_DAD0/oguoxvms.jpg[/img] [img]http://wot-tkt.tk/uploads/image/dIOSDx2u.jpg[/img] [quote]Overlapping roadwheels with rubber tires, with optional tracks (which will of course be on 24/7 in the game). IIRC at least one of the BT tanks was also designed to roll without tracks for higher road speeds, though in practice it wasn´t worth taking off the tracks because of frequent off-road driving. [/quote] Very fitting name.

aim-120s

Someone buy me a type62 on the US server :c

YES [quote]Yes, with new physics you will be able to exceed speed limits of vehicles.[/quote] Mauses going downhill at 50 km/h crushing fucking everything

Love the E4's new matchmaking. [quote] Victory! Battle: Prokhorovka August-09-12 12:46:30 PM Vehicle: M4A2E4 Experience received: 2,594 (x2 for the first victory each day) Credits received: 31,926 Battle Achievements: Steel Wall, Top Gun, Mastery Badge: "Ace Tanker" [/quote] [quote]Yes, with new physics you will be able to exceed speed limits of vehicles.[/quote] Here comes the M18 top speed change requests.

Wonder if you could use mediums to push heavies to the battle faster...

So yeah they basically got rid of the 72 km/h speed limit indeed. My T2 light just got whole lotta more hilarious. [quote]Or ram it and damage hard at speed of 85-90 km/h, while going downhill[/quote]

[QUOTE=Terminutter;37151370]Wonder if you could use mediums to push heavies to the battle faster...[/QUOTE] I already do that in places like the hill at himmelsdorf regardless of whether people like it or not It would be amusing if tanks like Maus or T95 were incapable of climbing steep hills and started to roll back though

I will try KV-2 ramming. That thing weighs enough to get a decent speed down a hill and would probably lose the turret if I did that irl.

New engine+track sounds for tanks in the 8.0 video confirmed by Russian dev to be real (not dubbed over like in the "old videos") and will be included in the patch.

[QUOTE=Orkel;37151341]YES Mauses going downhill at 50 km/h crushing fucking everything[/QUOTE] This is a good thing and a bad thing. The good thing is that I can go faster without having to stop, the bad thing is that I can't stop once im going downhill.

Almost all of the other sound effects will also be in 8.0

[QUOTE=Orkel;37151521]Almost all of the other sound effects will also be in 8.0[/QUOTE] Great, now I can see if it's actually worth it over these great sound packs I'm using.