• Runescape (V4) AKA Grindscape
    5,001 replies, posted
They denied my appeal. What the fuck. 4 years later.. common!
95 prayer :D, Bring it on...
[QUOTE=scorpinat;26135299]95 prayer :D, Bring it on...[/QUOTE] Gratz.
[url]http://services.runescape.com/m=adventurers-log/display_player_profile.ws?searchName=sak%20uh%20nuts[/url]
Still waiting to appeal my stupid ban again. I wanna play me some classic!
My AbyssPro got stuck and I was sitting in a bank for 2 hours opening and closing my bank. Still not banned amazingly.
[QUOTE=The DooD;26178389]My AbyssPro got stuck and I was sitting in a bank for 2 hours opening and closing my bank. Still not banned amazingly.[/QUOTE] Botting thread is that way.
[QUOTE=The DooD;26178389]My AbyssPro got stuck and I was sitting in a bank for 2 hours opening and closing my bank. Still not banned amazingly.[/QUOTE] You don't get banned that fast, or easy. [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=geel9;26179336]Botting thread is this way.[/QUOTE] yeah, thats why we talk about it here. [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=geel9;26179336]Botting thread is this way.[/QUOTE] yeah, thats why we talk about it here.
[QUOTE=geel9;26179336]Botting thread is that way.[/QUOTE] Sorry but no, you're the minority here now.
[QUOTE=NotMeh;26180847]Sorry but no, you're the minority here now.[/QUOTE] Always has been.
[QUOTE=mobrockers;26181195]Always has been.[/QUOTE] mobrockers can you help me find a wc bot
How long do I have to wait until I can appeal again?
[QUOTE=mobrockers;26181195]Always has been.[/QUOTE] Always [b]have[/b] been?
[QUOTE=Layley;26183494]Always [b]have[/b] been?[/QUOTE] It always has been that way. They always have been outnumbered. Could go either way
[QUOTE=The DooD;26185392]It always has been that way. They always have been outnumbered. Could go either way[/QUOTE] I meant the first, but yeah, I see how that could be confusing. [editline]21st November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=gRuKz;26181588]mobrockers can you help me find a wc bot[/QUOTE] [url]www.powerbot.org[/url]
Add me to the list: Fp name:Kirbyfactor RS name:Kirbyfactor
93 wc. [editline]21st November 2010[/editline] Currently Making 90k xp/hr on Ivy.
I remember back when I was a mod, back around 04-05. I miss that :frown: I also miss my rich friend, he loaned me a party hat and sara armor just for funzies. I don't know what happened to him though, he was a cool guy :sigh:
[QUOTE=XxLiquidxX;26215232]93 wc. [editline]21st November 2010[/editline] Currently Making 90k xp/hr on Ivy.[/QUOTE] It won't go much faster than that.
Tempted to make a bot exclusively for this thread.
i like turtles
Okay so I've managed to make a bridge from java to C++ so I can call rsbot methods from C++ and call C++ methods from rsbot. That means I can grab everything I need from rsbot, like storing all the singleton objects that rsbot creates (bank, store, camera, NPCs) things like that. With all that data, I should be able to provide a way to access all that data via scripting languages (Lua, angelscript, whatever) Or just make your script in C++ and compile it as a DLL (That will be good for people who want to keep scripts private) If I manage to get all that working well then I'll see if it would be possible to use the same technique on the game itself.
[QUOTE=layla;26259412]Okay so I've managed to make a bridge from java to C++ so I can call rsbot methods from C++ and call C++ methods from rsbot. That means I can grab everything I need from rsbot, like storing all the singleton objects that rsbot creates (bank, store, camera, NPCs) things like that. With all that data, I should be able to provide a way to access all that data via scripting languages (Lua, angelscript, whatever) Or just make your script in C++ and compile it as a DLL (That will be good for people who want to keep scripts private) If I manage to get all that working well then I'll see if it would be possible to use the same technique on the game itself.[/QUOTE] No one will use it, because we'd need 20000+ people to check all the scripts' source, I aint gonna use no C++ written script, ill stick to rsbot, which uses java, which is way easier to check.
No more safe mode.
[QUOTE=mobrockers;26262303]No one will use it, because we'd need 20000+ people to check all the scripts' source, I aint gonna use no C++ written script, ill stick to rsbot, which uses java, which is way easier to check.[/QUOTE] iirc, there are private rsbot scripts that are (poorly) obfuscated. They are checked by staff before posted so It's no different. I could write a very cryptic rsbot script that sent peoples details to a server and they would have no idea what/where to look for the code that did that.
[QUOTE=layla;26267543]iirc, there are private rsbot scripts that are (poorly) obfuscated. They are checked by staff before posted so It's no different. I could write a very cryptic rsbot script that sent peoples details to a server and they would have no idea what/where to look for the code that did that.[/QUOTE] They would, as they wrote the bot, and know what does what..
[QUOTE=mobrockers;26268708]They would, as they wrote the bot, and know what does what..[/QUOTE] O.o I think you missed the point. All Rsbot offers is callbacks, you can still perform any java operation you like and apply any sort of obfuscation to your script.
[QUOTE=layla;26270317]O.o I think you missed the point. All Rsbot offers is callbacks, you can still perform any java operation you like and apply any sort of obfuscation to your script.[/QUOTE] Go ahead and make it, I won't be using it though, rsbot works perfectly fine.
[QUOTE=mobrockers;26270635]Go ahead and make it, I won't be using it though, rsbot works perfectly fine.[/QUOTE] This wouldn't benefit you in the slightest.
[QUOTE=layla;26270731]This wouldn't benefit you in the slightest.[/QUOTE] What.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.