[QUOTE=venn178;38674830]AP Lulu pre-nerf was fucking insane. Morgana with stronger poke.[/QUOTE]
never again
[b]NEVER[/b]
[b]AGAIN[/b]
If anybody feels like doing it, would anybody mind looking over my masteries to see if they are the right kind of thing?
[url]http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/22956825#masteries[/url]
AD page is fine (just get one more AD quint obviously)
No point taking AP per level runes. I recommend flat MR blues.
[QUOTE=MaroonMak;38675123]If anybody feels like doing it, would anybody mind looking over my masteries to see if they are the right kind of thing?
[url]http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/22956825#masteries[/url][/QUOTE]
For your Tanky Jungle, it never hurts to go 0/21/9 masteries, last point when you can get it in Runic Affinity.
Ideally, you'll want to take a point in Summoners Resolve, max Hardiness, Tough Skin, Durability/Veterans Health, Indomitable, Bladed Armour and Initiator. It's up to you where you take Enlightenment or Honour Guard, I personally take Enlightenment on most champions.
In Utility, I build Summoners Insight, Expanded Mind, Swiftness and Runic Affinity.
Your current build is a bit off in some areas, if it works for you then stick with it of course, but what Junglers are you playing? The gp10 from Greed is only really worth it on slow junglers like Nunu. Awareness is barely worth it in my opinion, if you keep ganking lanes and farming your own jungle, you'll never be too far behind your laners and their Jungler.
Also worth noting, your Glyphs are flat Magic Resist, this means that early game you have more MR than most other champions, since a majority of players tend to take MR Per Level, meaning the 3 points in Magic Resist are a bit overkill for 1/2 lanes worth of ganks.
[QUOTE=MaroonMak;38675123]If anybody feels like doing it, would anybody mind looking over my masteries to see if they are the right kind of thing?
[url]http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/22956825#masteries[/url][/QUOTE]
I'd say just go AD Marks and AD Quints in your AD Rune Page, it'll make last hitting so much easier.
[img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63511818/no%20adc.jpg[/img]
have fun bot lane
Anyone + Blitzcrank
Seriously how did a draft get through a total of nine picks without a blitzcrank?
[QUOTE=venn178;38675396]Anyone + Blitzcrank
Seriously how did a draft get through a total of nine picks without a blitzcrank?[/QUOTE]
1300 elo
[editline]2nd December 2012[/editline]
we got the blitz
Just played my first game as Leona, since she's free. HOLY FUCK is she good.
Okay?
Fought a 5v4. Apparently their Amumu never connected yet no one queue dodged. The logic? "I don't want to wait for queue dodge"
Better then getting shit on for 20 minutes but each to their own.
3 days since I submitted a support ticket. Still no answer.
I hate Riot Support :suicide:
[QUOTE=ashxu;38675865]Okay?
Fought a 5v4. Apparently their Amumu never connected yet no one queue dodged. The logic? "I don't want to wait for queue dodge"
Better then getting shit on for 20 minutes but each to their own.[/QUOTE]
I bet then they went:
'report amumu pls omg'
Meh, Riot's support is decent/good considering the size of the playerbase.
Nexon took 9 months to reply to my support ticket and in the end the response was a message about cleaning out older requests. The only compensation I got was some shitty rent items.
[QUOTE=Pat.Lithium;38675404]1300 elo
[editline]2nd December 2012[/editline]
we got the blitz[/QUOTE]
Even in unranked 1000~1200 elo (I have two friends that have unranked elos at 800 and 950, respectively) draft someone gets blitzcrank. I can't fucking believe your team didn't first pick him. MAOKAI'S A SUPER HOT PICK THAT YOU GOTTA GET FIRST.
[QUOTE=Number-41;38667140]Think I'm gonna start reporting instalockers consequently, no matter how well they play. It's a selfish dick move.[/QUOTE]
Anyone care to elaborate their ratings? I'd really like to know why I should not do this.
Because you can't report for instalocking and if you report them for anything else there's no evidence of it so there's no point in doing it??
The tribunal is there to prevent toxic players of ruining the game. I find instalocking a clear characteristic of a "toxic player".
I'd pick "Refusing to communicate with the team" with a comment. Even though there's no clear evidence for it, it might help the tribunal get an impression on what kind of player they're dealing with (the player still got multiple cases if he gets reviewed). Since the general criterion for the Tribunal is "Is he/she a jerk or not?", I'd say a report for instalocking could help a little (even though it's not an official "offence").
Instalocking is just a first minute way of telling your team "Fuck you, I'll do whatever I want and I do not care for my team's gaming experience. On top of that, I'd rather play the champ I want and lose instead of showing some sense of team play. Me me me me"
If I see it happen during champ select, I immediately ask them why. Usually they say nothing until the last 10 seconds (where everyone is starting to realize we don't have a support for example), when they say something like "Already locked :( " with a sad smiley to try regain our sympathy. I won't shit on them during the game, but I'll try to let them know they shouldn't instalock.
I'm not defending instalocking, only pointing out that the lack of evidence of it means reporting for it is a little mundane. I think there [I]should[/I] be a report for instalocking. Honestly there shouldn't be a lock in option at all. Just wait out the 90 second champion select.
[editline]2nd December 2012[/editline]
Replace it with a ready-check, maybe?
If all ten players have ready checked, it then locks in for final countdown, but unless that happens you can unready and change your champion again. There's literally no drawbacks to that.
i remember an instalock im-not-support full ap nunu with teleport (i have a slow with e durr)
he fed
he fed terrifyingly
To be fair even if there wasn't locking in champions, I doubt it will stop the assholes who instantly pick whatever they want and call their lanes. It may reduce the number of instalockers by a slight amount but I don't think it will change much.
[QUOTE=Flip pl;38676187]i remember an instalock im-not-support full ap nunu with teleport (i have a slow with e durr)
he fed
he fed terrifyingly[/QUOTE]
I get stuff like that all the time in Normal draft. It pisses me off when we need an ADC and they decide to pick Teemo.
[video=youtube;hB6fLrUw7Hs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB6fLrUw7Hs[/video]
might be late, still a reminder doublelift is the best
[QUOTE=KillRay;38676496][video=youtube;hB6fLrUw7Hs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB6fLrUw7Hs[/video]
might be late, still a reminder doublelift is the best[/QUOTE]
DOUBLELIFT IS A CHINCHILLA
[QUOTE=venn178;38676161]I'm not defending instalocking, only pointing out that the lack of evidence of it means reporting for it is a little mundane. I think there [I]should[/I] be a report for instalocking. Honestly there shouldn't be a lock in option at all. Just wait out the 90 second champion select.
[editline]2nd December 2012[/editline]
Replace it with a ready-check, maybe?
If all ten players have ready checked, it then locks in for final countdown, but unless that happens you can unready and change your champion again. There's literally no drawbacks to that.[/QUOTE]
I can't think of any system that can't be abused or is completely watertight. That's why I'd rather want the Tribunal to enforce it. It'd be useful if the lock-in times and champion selection chat log were included in Tribunal cases. Maybe create some sort of voting system that cancels the game if 3 or 4 out of 5 people disagree with the team composition?
Sure, if it also threw them out of the queue for 10 minutes.
People would abuse it "omg picked tristana noob vote to cancel champ select plz"
[QUOTE=Number-41;38678150]I can't think of any system that can't be abused or is completely watertight. That's why I'd rather want the Tribunal to enforce it. It'd be useful if the lock-in times and champion selection chat log were included in Tribunal cases. Maybe create some sort of voting system that cancels the game if 3 or 4 out of 5 people disagree with the team composition?[/QUOTE]
I said this a few pages ago and everyone went 'Just dodge noob'
[IMG]http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/392/wtfif.png[/IMG]
carrying at low levels is like sticking a spiked club up your ass
I am seriously wanting to get Yorick. he looks extremely strong early game, and by the looks from some gameplay videos, he wrecks shit.
anything I should know before I do get him though?
[QUOTE=Omilinon;38679363]I am seriously wanting to get Yorick. he looks extremely strong early game, and by the looks from some gameplay videos, he wrecks shit.
anything I should know before I do get him though?[/QUOTE]
ult vayne, not yourself
[editline]2nd December 2012[/editline]
i can not believe how many yoricks ult themselves in a team fight and ignore me, the adc, and just go do what the fuck ever
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
